Why does my Macbook overheat and use so much CPU and energy when on YouTube?Why do so many insist on using...

If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?

Why do computer-science majors learn calculus?

Accidentally deleted the "/usr/share" folder

Unidentified items in bicycle tube repair kit

Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?

Save terminal output to a txt file

Does hiding behind 5-ft-wide cover give full cover?

Is it the same airport YUL and YMQ in Canada?

Stark VS Thanos

Transfer over $10k

Was Unix ever a single-user OS?

How to scale a verbatim environment on a minipage?

How to efficiently calculate prefix sum of frequencies of characters in a string?

Why do freehub and cassette have only one position that matches?

Selecting a secure PIN for building access

What happens if I start too many background jobs?

Why is Thanos so tough at the beginning of "Avengers: Endgame"?

Junior developer struggles: how to communicate with management?

Attending a conference where my ex-supervisor and his collaborator are present, should I attend?

How did Arya manage to disguise herself?

Is it cheaper to drop cargo than to land it?

What happened to Ghost?

Why are notes ordered like they are on a piano?

Why does my Macbook overheat and use so much CPU and energy when on YouTube?



Why does my Macbook overheat and use so much CPU and energy when on YouTube?


Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?Parallels VM process has high CPU on Macbook Pro Retina when running Chrome in Parallels 8How does Parallels' CPU and ram usage work? When to shutdown virtual machine?Google Chrome Helper for “GPU Process” constantly shown as non responsive in OS X 10.9High CPU and energy usage in SafariMacbook Air screen drawing suddenly slowWhy a sudden increase in CPU when battery low?Mac at 100% CPU Usage when plugged into monitorWhat could cause a huge spike in Unix System Calls for a process and how to debugMacbook performance issues with browsersMessages and soagent making CPU spike - any solutions?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







3















For a long time now, my Macbook has been overheating and hogging my CPU. According to Activity Monitor, Google Chrome Helper is the culprit. Whenever I am browsing the web, there are usually ten seperate entries of Google Chrome Helper in Activity Monitor, each individually using around %0.5 of my CPU. On YouTube, one of these can spike up to using %82, with a second using %22. I don't understand the math behind it but its evident in the screenshots I took. I own an up-to-date MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) so it could be a result of an old system but only Chrome and YouTube (or just videos) are causing this issue.



Here are some things I’ve attempted to control / solve this:




  • updating FlashPlayer

  • disabling extentions

  • turning off Unsandboxed plug-in access to "not allow any site to use a plug-in to access [my] computer"

  • turning off JavaScript (which, of course, just stopped the page from loading in - very power efficient and cool, but not the trade off I had hoped to accomplish)


I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general that are being served



At the moment, I have had to use an app called MacsFanControl so my fan stops the CPU and computer from overheating as it used to get to around 50˚C. Now, it is sits at 40˚C with the fan running on high to prevent it increasing.



Am I missing controls or options to have less heat from the CPU of this era MacBook Pro?










share|improve this question









New contributor




SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.

    – modlin
    6 hours ago











  • Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.

    – Steve Chambers
    6 hours ago











  • Did you try a local video for comparison?

    – John Keates
    3 hours ago


















3















For a long time now, my Macbook has been overheating and hogging my CPU. According to Activity Monitor, Google Chrome Helper is the culprit. Whenever I am browsing the web, there are usually ten seperate entries of Google Chrome Helper in Activity Monitor, each individually using around %0.5 of my CPU. On YouTube, one of these can spike up to using %82, with a second using %22. I don't understand the math behind it but its evident in the screenshots I took. I own an up-to-date MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) so it could be a result of an old system but only Chrome and YouTube (or just videos) are causing this issue.



Here are some things I’ve attempted to control / solve this:




  • updating FlashPlayer

  • disabling extentions

  • turning off Unsandboxed plug-in access to "not allow any site to use a plug-in to access [my] computer"

  • turning off JavaScript (which, of course, just stopped the page from loading in - very power efficient and cool, but not the trade off I had hoped to accomplish)


I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general that are being served



At the moment, I have had to use an app called MacsFanControl so my fan stops the CPU and computer from overheating as it used to get to around 50˚C. Now, it is sits at 40˚C with the fan running on high to prevent it increasing.



Am I missing controls or options to have less heat from the CPU of this era MacBook Pro?










share|improve this question









New contributor




SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.

    – modlin
    6 hours ago











  • Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.

    – Steve Chambers
    6 hours ago











  • Did you try a local video for comparison?

    – John Keates
    3 hours ago














3












3








3








For a long time now, my Macbook has been overheating and hogging my CPU. According to Activity Monitor, Google Chrome Helper is the culprit. Whenever I am browsing the web, there are usually ten seperate entries of Google Chrome Helper in Activity Monitor, each individually using around %0.5 of my CPU. On YouTube, one of these can spike up to using %82, with a second using %22. I don't understand the math behind it but its evident in the screenshots I took. I own an up-to-date MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) so it could be a result of an old system but only Chrome and YouTube (or just videos) are causing this issue.



Here are some things I’ve attempted to control / solve this:




  • updating FlashPlayer

  • disabling extentions

  • turning off Unsandboxed plug-in access to "not allow any site to use a plug-in to access [my] computer"

  • turning off JavaScript (which, of course, just stopped the page from loading in - very power efficient and cool, but not the trade off I had hoped to accomplish)


I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general that are being served



At the moment, I have had to use an app called MacsFanControl so my fan stops the CPU and computer from overheating as it used to get to around 50˚C. Now, it is sits at 40˚C with the fan running on high to prevent it increasing.



Am I missing controls or options to have less heat from the CPU of this era MacBook Pro?










share|improve this question









New contributor




SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












For a long time now, my Macbook has been overheating and hogging my CPU. According to Activity Monitor, Google Chrome Helper is the culprit. Whenever I am browsing the web, there are usually ten seperate entries of Google Chrome Helper in Activity Monitor, each individually using around %0.5 of my CPU. On YouTube, one of these can spike up to using %82, with a second using %22. I don't understand the math behind it but its evident in the screenshots I took. I own an up-to-date MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) so it could be a result of an old system but only Chrome and YouTube (or just videos) are causing this issue.



Here are some things I’ve attempted to control / solve this:




  • updating FlashPlayer

  • disabling extentions

  • turning off Unsandboxed plug-in access to "not allow any site to use a plug-in to access [my] computer"

  • turning off JavaScript (which, of course, just stopped the page from loading in - very power efficient and cool, but not the trade off I had hoped to accomplish)


I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general that are being served



At the moment, I have had to use an app called MacsFanControl so my fan stops the CPU and computer from overheating as it used to get to around 50˚C. Now, it is sits at 40˚C with the fan running on high to prevent it increasing.



Am I missing controls or options to have less heat from the CPU of this era MacBook Pro?







mac google-chrome cpu activity-monitor cooling






share|improve this question









New contributor




SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









bmike

163k46293634




163k46293634






New contributor




SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









SamStarkSamStark

161




161




New contributor




SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






SamStark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.

    – modlin
    6 hours ago











  • Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.

    – Steve Chambers
    6 hours ago











  • Did you try a local video for comparison?

    – John Keates
    3 hours ago



















  • Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.

    – modlin
    6 hours ago











  • Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.

    – Steve Chambers
    6 hours ago











  • Did you try a local video for comparison?

    – John Keates
    3 hours ago

















Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.

– modlin
6 hours ago





Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.

– modlin
6 hours ago













Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.

– Steve Chambers
6 hours ago





Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.

– Steve Chambers
6 hours ago













Did you try a local video for comparison?

– John Keates
3 hours ago





Did you try a local video for comparison?

– John Keates
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.



Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.



It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.



The fan control you mention is excellent.



Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?





I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.

    – SamStark
    2 hours ago



















1














You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.



Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.



You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.



When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.






share|improve this answer































    0














    Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.



    Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.



    If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.



    In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.



    See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."

      – abc
      5 hours ago











    • I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.

      – SamStark
      2 hours ago



















    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.



    Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.



    It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.



    The fan control you mention is excellent.



    Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?





    I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 1





      I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.

      – SamStark
      2 hours ago
















    1














    I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.



    Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.



    It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.



    The fan control you mention is excellent.



    Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?





    I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 1





      I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.

      – SamStark
      2 hours ago














    1












    1








    1







    I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.



    Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.



    It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.



    The fan control you mention is excellent.



    Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?





    I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.



    Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.



    It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.



    The fan control you mention is excellent.



    Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?





    I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 3 hours ago









    StefanStefan

    1112




    1112




    New contributor




    Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Stefan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 1





      I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.

      – SamStark
      2 hours ago














    • 1





      I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.

      – SamStark
      2 hours ago








    1




    1





    I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.

    – SamStark
    2 hours ago





    I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.

    – SamStark
    2 hours ago













    1














    You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.



    Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.



    You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.



    When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.



      Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.



      You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.



      When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.



        Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.



        You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.



        When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.






        share|improve this answer













        You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.



        Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.



        You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.



        When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        bmikebmike

        163k46293634




        163k46293634























            0














            Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.



            Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.



            If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.



            In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.



            See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."

              – abc
              5 hours ago











            • I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.

              – SamStark
              2 hours ago
















            0














            Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.



            Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.



            If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.



            In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.



            See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."

              – abc
              5 hours ago











            • I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.

              – SamStark
              2 hours ago














            0












            0








            0







            Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.



            Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.



            If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.



            In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.



            See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?






            share|improve this answer















            Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.



            Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.



            If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.



            In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.



            See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 6 hours ago









            Bill SmithBill Smith

            69713




            69713








            • 1





              OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."

              – abc
              5 hours ago











            • I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.

              – SamStark
              2 hours ago














            • 1





              OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."

              – abc
              5 hours ago











            • I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.

              – SamStark
              2 hours ago








            1




            1





            OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."

            – abc
            5 hours ago





            OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."

            – abc
            5 hours ago













            I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.

            – SamStark
            2 hours ago





            I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.

            – SamStark
            2 hours ago



            Popular posts from this blog

            Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

            Hestehale Innhaldsliste Hestehale på kvinner | Hestehale på menn | Galleri | Sjå òg |...

            What is the “three and three hundred thousand syndrome”?Who wrote the book Arena?What five creatures were...