What was the state of the German rail system in 1944?Was the idea behind what would become the Holocaust...

What does air vanishing on contact sound like?

Shoteh in the gemara

Why do freehub and cassette have only one position that matches?

Can I use 1000v rectifier diodes instead of 600v rectifier diodes?

Why is Arya visibly scared in the library in S8E3?

Change active object through scripting

How long can a 35mm film be used/stored before it starts to lose its quality after expiry?

Authors and contributors of forked project

A non-technological, repeating, visible object in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hours

Has any spacecraft ever had the ability to directly communicate with civilian air traffic control?

When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?

How to compensate for height when using a ranged attack

How to assert on pagereference where the endpoint of pagereference is predefined

How do I tell my manager that he's wrong?

Loading but not using TikZ changes a file

If 1. e4 c6 is considered as a sound defense for black, why is 1. c3 so rare?

How to implement float hashing with approximate equality

What was the state of the German rail system in 1944?

Sower of Discord, Gideon's Sacrifice and Stuffy Doll

If Melisandre foresaw another character closing blue eyes, why did she follow Stannis?

Write to EXCEL from SQL DB using VBA script

Survey Confirmation - Emphasize the question or the answer?

Geometry - Proving a common centroid.

How did Captain America use this power?



What was the state of the German rail system in 1944?


Was the idea behind what would become the Holocaust planned by German elites in that time?What was the German perspective on Stalingrad?Was the Iraqi Mukhabarat modelled on the German Reichssicherheitshauptamt, and in what ways?How did the KPD relate to the German state during the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact?What was it like for German Jews after WWII?What was the mechanized/motorized distribution in German Panzer divisions?Why/how did German arms output peak in 1944 when they were running out of oil?Considering what was known about Hitler in 1933, why would German bishops declare that Catholics could cooperate with the new State?At the start of Barbarossa, what was the state of Germany's oil supply?What did the average German citizen know about the war?













3















Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944? I need to know how Allied bombing might have disrupted the system.



For context: I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Yes. Allied bombing disrupted the system, the Germans repaired it, the Allies bombed some more. This was an ongoing process which cost Germany both rolling stock and track materials at a rate that could not be replaced, but it didn't shut the rail system down completely. By the way, a question like this with no more context than "I need to know" looks suspiciously like some holocaust deniers who try to place their talking points on StackExchange. I hope that this is not the case here, but you might explain a bit more.

    – o.m.
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    I am NOT a holocaust denier! Au contraire. I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?

    – Olivia
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    You should edit extra information into your question and not add it as an answer.

    – Steve Bird
    1 hour ago











  • This is not an answer to the question that was asked. By user request, I turned it into a comment. However, you can (and are encouraged to) edit this material into the question you asked. There should be an "edit" button or link directly underneath it.

    – T.E.D.
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Didn't we have a previous question about allied bombing of German train lines?

    – T.E.D.
    1 hour ago
















3















Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944? I need to know how Allied bombing might have disrupted the system.



For context: I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Yes. Allied bombing disrupted the system, the Germans repaired it, the Allies bombed some more. This was an ongoing process which cost Germany both rolling stock and track materials at a rate that could not be replaced, but it didn't shut the rail system down completely. By the way, a question like this with no more context than "I need to know" looks suspiciously like some holocaust deniers who try to place their talking points on StackExchange. I hope that this is not the case here, but you might explain a bit more.

    – o.m.
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    I am NOT a holocaust denier! Au contraire. I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?

    – Olivia
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    You should edit extra information into your question and not add it as an answer.

    – Steve Bird
    1 hour ago











  • This is not an answer to the question that was asked. By user request, I turned it into a comment. However, you can (and are encouraged to) edit this material into the question you asked. There should be an "edit" button or link directly underneath it.

    – T.E.D.
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Didn't we have a previous question about allied bombing of German train lines?

    – T.E.D.
    1 hour ago














3












3








3








Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944? I need to know how Allied bombing might have disrupted the system.



For context: I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944? I need to know how Allied bombing might have disrupted the system.



For context: I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?







nazi-germany






share|improve this question









New contributor




Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 58 mins ago









Denis de Bernardy

14.9k24757




14.9k24757






New contributor




Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









OliviaOlivia

161




161




New contributor




Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Olivia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Yes. Allied bombing disrupted the system, the Germans repaired it, the Allies bombed some more. This was an ongoing process which cost Germany both rolling stock and track materials at a rate that could not be replaced, but it didn't shut the rail system down completely. By the way, a question like this with no more context than "I need to know" looks suspiciously like some holocaust deniers who try to place their talking points on StackExchange. I hope that this is not the case here, but you might explain a bit more.

    – o.m.
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    I am NOT a holocaust denier! Au contraire. I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?

    – Olivia
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    You should edit extra information into your question and not add it as an answer.

    – Steve Bird
    1 hour ago











  • This is not an answer to the question that was asked. By user request, I turned it into a comment. However, you can (and are encouraged to) edit this material into the question you asked. There should be an "edit" button or link directly underneath it.

    – T.E.D.
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Didn't we have a previous question about allied bombing of German train lines?

    – T.E.D.
    1 hour ago



















  • Yes. Allied bombing disrupted the system, the Germans repaired it, the Allies bombed some more. This was an ongoing process which cost Germany both rolling stock and track materials at a rate that could not be replaced, but it didn't shut the rail system down completely. By the way, a question like this with no more context than "I need to know" looks suspiciously like some holocaust deniers who try to place their talking points on StackExchange. I hope that this is not the case here, but you might explain a bit more.

    – o.m.
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    I am NOT a holocaust denier! Au contraire. I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?

    – Olivia
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    You should edit extra information into your question and not add it as an answer.

    – Steve Bird
    1 hour ago











  • This is not an answer to the question that was asked. By user request, I turned it into a comment. However, you can (and are encouraged to) edit this material into the question you asked. There should be an "edit" button or link directly underneath it.

    – T.E.D.
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Didn't we have a previous question about allied bombing of German train lines?

    – T.E.D.
    1 hour ago

















Yes. Allied bombing disrupted the system, the Germans repaired it, the Allies bombed some more. This was an ongoing process which cost Germany both rolling stock and track materials at a rate that could not be replaced, but it didn't shut the rail system down completely. By the way, a question like this with no more context than "I need to know" looks suspiciously like some holocaust deniers who try to place their talking points on StackExchange. I hope that this is not the case here, but you might explain a bit more.

– o.m.
1 hour ago







Yes. Allied bombing disrupted the system, the Germans repaired it, the Allies bombed some more. This was an ongoing process which cost Germany both rolling stock and track materials at a rate that could not be replaced, but it didn't shut the rail system down completely. By the way, a question like this with no more context than "I need to know" looks suspiciously like some holocaust deniers who try to place their talking points on StackExchange. I hope that this is not the case here, but you might explain a bit more.

– o.m.
1 hour ago






1




1





I am NOT a holocaust denier! Au contraire. I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?

– Olivia
1 hour ago







I am NOT a holocaust denier! Au contraire. I am writing a mystery which includes a memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz. I want to be as accurate as possible... presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?

– Olivia
1 hour ago






1




1





You should edit extra information into your question and not add it as an answer.

– Steve Bird
1 hour ago





You should edit extra information into your question and not add it as an answer.

– Steve Bird
1 hour ago













This is not an answer to the question that was asked. By user request, I turned it into a comment. However, you can (and are encouraged to) edit this material into the question you asked. There should be an "edit" button or link directly underneath it.

– T.E.D.
1 hour ago







This is not an answer to the question that was asked. By user request, I turned it into a comment. However, you can (and are encouraged to) edit this material into the question you asked. There should be an "edit" button or link directly underneath it.

– T.E.D.
1 hour ago






1




1





Didn't we have a previous question about allied bombing of German train lines?

– T.E.D.
1 hour ago





Didn't we have a previous question about allied bombing of German train lines?

– T.E.D.
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1















Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944?




Yes. Per the many comments to your question they'd repair the rails as they'd get destroyed. It might get delayed, but it would arrive.




presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?




(This being for a fictional journal, I presume you're not very interested in the potentially odd example that didn't follow the rule of thumb.)



To the best of my knowledge, no trains to concentration camps were cancelled owing to track damage. Delayed, I would assume with some regularity; but not cancelled. The reason I write not cancelled is that the nazis would prioritize troop convoys over holocaust trains. They had zero consideration for whoever was in the holocaust trains. This meant that trains arrived 4 days after leaving on average. The longest transport of the war probably illustrates this best. It departed from Corfu in Greece. When the train arrived 18 days later, everyone was dead when they opened the doors.



As to the journey the other way around, bombings or not it only takes a single track to get the traffic going. And as I've just noted above, the holocaust convey, rather than the SS or whatever else, would have been the one waiting if two trains were traveling in opposite directions.





If you're writing a fictional memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz, you might want to invest 10 hours and watch the soul-wrenching "Shoah" documentary if you want to try to convey the horrors of the time in your fictional journal. You will weep if there is any humanity in you. But do watch it regardless, because there simply is no way you'll be able to credibly capture the acute horror of the death camps without watching those first hand witness accounts or reading a few books to the same effect.






share|improve this answer

































    1














    In August/September 1944, the German rail system was working reasonably well. It was heavily loaded, and sometimes damaged by bombing, but the Western allies weren't doing much bombing east of Berlin. Starting in October, the Western allies bean attacking the rail system systematically, which caused it to break down entirely in early 1944.



    Source: The Collapse of the German War Economy, 1944-1945: Allied Air Power and the German National Railway, Alfred C. Mierzejewski, 2007.





    share
























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "324"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Olivia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52371%2fwhat-was-the-state-of-the-german-rail-system-in-1944%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1















      Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944?




      Yes. Per the many comments to your question they'd repair the rails as they'd get destroyed. It might get delayed, but it would arrive.




      presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?




      (This being for a fictional journal, I presume you're not very interested in the potentially odd example that didn't follow the rule of thumb.)



      To the best of my knowledge, no trains to concentration camps were cancelled owing to track damage. Delayed, I would assume with some regularity; but not cancelled. The reason I write not cancelled is that the nazis would prioritize troop convoys over holocaust trains. They had zero consideration for whoever was in the holocaust trains. This meant that trains arrived 4 days after leaving on average. The longest transport of the war probably illustrates this best. It departed from Corfu in Greece. When the train arrived 18 days later, everyone was dead when they opened the doors.



      As to the journey the other way around, bombings or not it only takes a single track to get the traffic going. And as I've just noted above, the holocaust convey, rather than the SS or whatever else, would have been the one waiting if two trains were traveling in opposite directions.





      If you're writing a fictional memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz, you might want to invest 10 hours and watch the soul-wrenching "Shoah" documentary if you want to try to convey the horrors of the time in your fictional journal. You will weep if there is any humanity in you. But do watch it regardless, because there simply is no way you'll be able to credibly capture the acute horror of the death camps without watching those first hand witness accounts or reading a few books to the same effect.






      share|improve this answer






























        1















        Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944?




        Yes. Per the many comments to your question they'd repair the rails as they'd get destroyed. It might get delayed, but it would arrive.




        presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?




        (This being for a fictional journal, I presume you're not very interested in the potentially odd example that didn't follow the rule of thumb.)



        To the best of my knowledge, no trains to concentration camps were cancelled owing to track damage. Delayed, I would assume with some regularity; but not cancelled. The reason I write not cancelled is that the nazis would prioritize troop convoys over holocaust trains. They had zero consideration for whoever was in the holocaust trains. This meant that trains arrived 4 days after leaving on average. The longest transport of the war probably illustrates this best. It departed from Corfu in Greece. When the train arrived 18 days later, everyone was dead when they opened the doors.



        As to the journey the other way around, bombings or not it only takes a single track to get the traffic going. And as I've just noted above, the holocaust convey, rather than the SS or whatever else, would have been the one waiting if two trains were traveling in opposite directions.





        If you're writing a fictional memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz, you might want to invest 10 hours and watch the soul-wrenching "Shoah" documentary if you want to try to convey the horrors of the time in your fictional journal. You will weep if there is any humanity in you. But do watch it regardless, because there simply is no way you'll be able to credibly capture the acute horror of the death camps without watching those first hand witness accounts or reading a few books to the same effect.






        share|improve this answer




























          1












          1








          1








          Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944?




          Yes. Per the many comments to your question they'd repair the rails as they'd get destroyed. It might get delayed, but it would arrive.




          presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?




          (This being for a fictional journal, I presume you're not very interested in the potentially odd example that didn't follow the rule of thumb.)



          To the best of my knowledge, no trains to concentration camps were cancelled owing to track damage. Delayed, I would assume with some regularity; but not cancelled. The reason I write not cancelled is that the nazis would prioritize troop convoys over holocaust trains. They had zero consideration for whoever was in the holocaust trains. This meant that trains arrived 4 days after leaving on average. The longest transport of the war probably illustrates this best. It departed from Corfu in Greece. When the train arrived 18 days later, everyone was dead when they opened the doors.



          As to the journey the other way around, bombings or not it only takes a single track to get the traffic going. And as I've just noted above, the holocaust convey, rather than the SS or whatever else, would have been the one waiting if two trains were traveling in opposite directions.





          If you're writing a fictional memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz, you might want to invest 10 hours and watch the soul-wrenching "Shoah" documentary if you want to try to convey the horrors of the time in your fictional journal. You will weep if there is any humanity in you. But do watch it regardless, because there simply is no way you'll be able to credibly capture the acute horror of the death camps without watching those first hand witness accounts or reading a few books to the same effect.






          share|improve this answer
















          Could an SS officer get from Auschwitz to Berlin by train in July/August/September 1944?




          Yes. Per the many comments to your question they'd repair the rails as they'd get destroyed. It might get delayed, but it would arrive.




          presumably the disruptions didn't keep them from shipping people TO Auschwitz. Would an officer leaving Auschwitz use a different rail line?




          (This being for a fictional journal, I presume you're not very interested in the potentially odd example that didn't follow the rule of thumb.)



          To the best of my knowledge, no trains to concentration camps were cancelled owing to track damage. Delayed, I would assume with some regularity; but not cancelled. The reason I write not cancelled is that the nazis would prioritize troop convoys over holocaust trains. They had zero consideration for whoever was in the holocaust trains. This meant that trains arrived 4 days after leaving on average. The longest transport of the war probably illustrates this best. It departed from Corfu in Greece. When the train arrived 18 days later, everyone was dead when they opened the doors.



          As to the journey the other way around, bombings or not it only takes a single track to get the traffic going. And as I've just noted above, the holocaust convey, rather than the SS or whatever else, would have been the one waiting if two trains were traveling in opposite directions.





          If you're writing a fictional memoir of a survivor of Auschwitz, you might want to invest 10 hours and watch the soul-wrenching "Shoah" documentary if you want to try to convey the horrors of the time in your fictional journal. You will weep if there is any humanity in you. But do watch it regardless, because there simply is no way you'll be able to credibly capture the acute horror of the death camps without watching those first hand witness accounts or reading a few books to the same effect.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 9 mins ago

























          answered 39 mins ago









          Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

          14.9k24757




          14.9k24757























              1














              In August/September 1944, the German rail system was working reasonably well. It was heavily loaded, and sometimes damaged by bombing, but the Western allies weren't doing much bombing east of Berlin. Starting in October, the Western allies bean attacking the rail system systematically, which caused it to break down entirely in early 1944.



              Source: The Collapse of the German War Economy, 1944-1945: Allied Air Power and the German National Railway, Alfred C. Mierzejewski, 2007.





              share




























                1














                In August/September 1944, the German rail system was working reasonably well. It was heavily loaded, and sometimes damaged by bombing, but the Western allies weren't doing much bombing east of Berlin. Starting in October, the Western allies bean attacking the rail system systematically, which caused it to break down entirely in early 1944.



                Source: The Collapse of the German War Economy, 1944-1945: Allied Air Power and the German National Railway, Alfred C. Mierzejewski, 2007.





                share


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  In August/September 1944, the German rail system was working reasonably well. It was heavily loaded, and sometimes damaged by bombing, but the Western allies weren't doing much bombing east of Berlin. Starting in October, the Western allies bean attacking the rail system systematically, which caused it to break down entirely in early 1944.



                  Source: The Collapse of the German War Economy, 1944-1945: Allied Air Power and the German National Railway, Alfred C. Mierzejewski, 2007.





                  share













                  In August/September 1944, the German rail system was working reasonably well. It was heavily loaded, and sometimes damaged by bombing, but the Western allies weren't doing much bombing east of Berlin. Starting in October, the Western allies bean attacking the rail system systematically, which caused it to break down entirely in early 1944.



                  Source: The Collapse of the German War Economy, 1944-1945: Allied Air Power and the German National Railway, Alfred C. Mierzejewski, 2007.






                  share











                  share


                  share










                  answered 7 mins ago









                  John DallmanJohn Dallman

                  18.1k35885




                  18.1k35885






















                      Olivia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Olivia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Olivia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Olivia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52371%2fwhat-was-the-state-of-the-german-rail-system-in-1944%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

                      Nässjö kommun Tettstader | Kjelder | NavigasjonsmenyeVIAFISNIGeoNamesMusicBrainz (area)

                      Kvitkval Innhaldsliste Taksonomi og utvikling | Utsjånad og levevis | Utbreiing | Åtferd |...