Why does concentrated shear force on a beam influence the whole beam? The 2019 Stack Overflow...
What force causes entropy to increase?
Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?
system call string length limit
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
How to prevent selfdestruct from another contract
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
Empty set is subset of every set? If yes, why that...
Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?
How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
Python - Fishing Simulator
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
What's the point in a preamp?
What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
Synthesis of a weinreb amide from an acid
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
Difference between "generating set" and free product?
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
Why does concentrated shear force on a beam influence the whole beam?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do you select the correct area to consiser for first moment of area calculations?How determine the compression of a beam with a concentrated end load in the x axis?Problems with shear force diagram in beam modelDistribution of shear stress in beam bendingDetermine shear flow direction in profile/beam sectionMaximum shear force of metric steel boltWhy does the fulcrum pin of a band brake experience “double” shear stressInfluence of shear force on pressed part with steep wallsShear force requirementShear force and bending moment for continuous span
$begingroup$

This might be a silly question but can someone explain how this shear force on the right side of the beam causes Qy throught the whole beam?
I understand it mathematically but not conceptually so I would be grateful is someone could help me understand this via an analogy or something, because when I solve mechanics I am often stuck on such simple problems because intuitively it feels incorrect to me.
I'm aware there is also the M force on the beam but I left it out of the picture because that one I can visualize and I understand it.
In other words, why does the whole beam "feel" this force (if we ignore bending for a moment)? if you press down on my hand I don't feel that pressure anywhere else on my arm.
beam shear solid-mechanics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$

This might be a silly question but can someone explain how this shear force on the right side of the beam causes Qy throught the whole beam?
I understand it mathematically but not conceptually so I would be grateful is someone could help me understand this via an analogy or something, because when I solve mechanics I am often stuck on such simple problems because intuitively it feels incorrect to me.
I'm aware there is also the M force on the beam but I left it out of the picture because that one I can visualize and I understand it.
In other words, why does the whole beam "feel" this force (if we ignore bending for a moment)? if you press down on my hand I don't feel that pressure anywhere else on my arm.
beam shear solid-mechanics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$

This might be a silly question but can someone explain how this shear force on the right side of the beam causes Qy throught the whole beam?
I understand it mathematically but not conceptually so I would be grateful is someone could help me understand this via an analogy or something, because when I solve mechanics I am often stuck on such simple problems because intuitively it feels incorrect to me.
I'm aware there is also the M force on the beam but I left it out of the picture because that one I can visualize and I understand it.
In other words, why does the whole beam "feel" this force (if we ignore bending for a moment)? if you press down on my hand I don't feel that pressure anywhere else on my arm.
beam shear solid-mechanics
$endgroup$

This might be a silly question but can someone explain how this shear force on the right side of the beam causes Qy throught the whole beam?
I understand it mathematically but not conceptually so I would be grateful is someone could help me understand this via an analogy or something, because when I solve mechanics I am often stuck on such simple problems because intuitively it feels incorrect to me.
I'm aware there is also the M force on the beam but I left it out of the picture because that one I can visualize and I understand it.
In other words, why does the whole beam "feel" this force (if we ignore bending for a moment)? if you press down on my hand I don't feel that pressure anywhere else on my arm.
beam shear solid-mechanics
beam shear solid-mechanics
asked 4 hours ago
M. WotherM. Wother
1165
1165
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.

So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.

This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.
The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.
Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "595"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26862%2fwhy-does-concentrated-shear-force-on-a-beam-influence-the-whole-beam%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.

So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.

This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.
The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.

So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.

This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.
The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.

So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.

This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.
The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.
$endgroup$
So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.

So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.

This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.
The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.
answered 3 hours ago
CableStayCableStay
1,682724
1,682724
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.
Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.
Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.
Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.
$endgroup$
The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.
Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.
answered 3 hours ago
kamrankamran
4,7622511
4,7622511
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26862%2fwhy-does-concentrated-shear-force-on-a-beam-influence-the-whole-beam%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown