Why does concentrated shear force on a beam influence the whole beam? The 2019 Stack Overflow...

What force causes entropy to increase?

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

system call string length limit

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

How to prevent selfdestruct from another contract

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached

Empty set is subset of every set? If yes, why that...

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Python - Fishing Simulator

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

What's the point in a preamp?

What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Synthesis of a weinreb amide from an acid

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Difference between "generating set" and free product?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?



Why does concentrated shear force on a beam influence the whole beam?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do you select the correct area to consiser for first moment of area calculations?How determine the compression of a beam with a concentrated end load in the x axis?Problems with shear force diagram in beam modelDistribution of shear stress in beam bendingDetermine shear flow direction in profile/beam sectionMaximum shear force of metric steel boltWhy does the fulcrum pin of a band brake experience “double” shear stressInfluence of shear force on pressed part with steep wallsShear force requirementShear force and bending moment for continuous span












2












$begingroup$


enter image description here



This might be a silly question but can someone explain how this shear force on the right side of the beam causes Qy throught the whole beam?



I understand it mathematically but not conceptually so I would be grateful is someone could help me understand this via an analogy or something, because when I solve mechanics I am often stuck on such simple problems because intuitively it feels incorrect to me.



I'm aware there is also the M force on the beam but I left it out of the picture because that one I can visualize and I understand it.



In other words, why does the whole beam "feel" this force (if we ignore bending for a moment)? if you press down on my hand I don't feel that pressure anywhere else on my arm.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    enter image description here



    This might be a silly question but can someone explain how this shear force on the right side of the beam causes Qy throught the whole beam?



    I understand it mathematically but not conceptually so I would be grateful is someone could help me understand this via an analogy or something, because when I solve mechanics I am often stuck on such simple problems because intuitively it feels incorrect to me.



    I'm aware there is also the M force on the beam but I left it out of the picture because that one I can visualize and I understand it.



    In other words, why does the whole beam "feel" this force (if we ignore bending for a moment)? if you press down on my hand I don't feel that pressure anywhere else on my arm.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      enter image description here



      This might be a silly question but can someone explain how this shear force on the right side of the beam causes Qy throught the whole beam?



      I understand it mathematically but not conceptually so I would be grateful is someone could help me understand this via an analogy or something, because when I solve mechanics I am often stuck on such simple problems because intuitively it feels incorrect to me.



      I'm aware there is also the M force on the beam but I left it out of the picture because that one I can visualize and I understand it.



      In other words, why does the whole beam "feel" this force (if we ignore bending for a moment)? if you press down on my hand I don't feel that pressure anywhere else on my arm.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      enter image description here



      This might be a silly question but can someone explain how this shear force on the right side of the beam causes Qy throught the whole beam?



      I understand it mathematically but not conceptually so I would be grateful is someone could help me understand this via an analogy or something, because when I solve mechanics I am often stuck on such simple problems because intuitively it feels incorrect to me.



      I'm aware there is also the M force on the beam but I left it out of the picture because that one I can visualize and I understand it.



      In other words, why does the whole beam "feel" this force (if we ignore bending for a moment)? if you press down on my hand I don't feel that pressure anywhere else on my arm.







      beam shear solid-mechanics






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      M. WotherM. Wother

      1165




      1165






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.



          cantilever beam with shear reaction



          So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.



          shear reaction at various section cuts



          This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.



          The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.



            Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "595"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26862%2fwhy-does-concentrated-shear-force-on-a-beam-influence-the-whole-beam%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.



              cantilever beam with shear reaction



              So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.



              shear reaction at various section cuts



              This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.



              The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.



                cantilever beam with shear reaction



                So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.



                shear reaction at various section cuts



                This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.



                The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.



                  cantilever beam with shear reaction



                  So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.



                  shear reaction at various section cuts



                  This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.



                  The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  So, we apply a point load to the end of the cantilever beam and can see that for external equilibrium, there must be shear reaction at the support. (Leaving aside for now the moment reaction that also exists.) We have an intuitive understanding of this Newtonian action-reaction from our daily lives.



                  cantilever beam with shear reaction



                  So, the next question is, how is the load 'getting' from the point of application to the support? We can assess that by looking at internal equilibrium. If we start from the right end of the beam (where the load is applied) and cut the beam at any section, there must be a shear reaction for the beam segment to be in equilibrium. We can see this using the same logic as for the external equilibrium.



                  shear reaction at various section cuts



                  This illustrates that the applied load creates a shear force at every point along the beam.



                  The example you gave from the human body is perhaps a difficult one for developing this intuition, given the complexity of muscle, tendon, and bone. However, you mention that if you you press down on your hand you don't feel the "pressure" anywhere else, so this may be about distinguishing between internal and external equilibrium. Pressure is external. The beam (or your hand) only feels that external pressure at the point of load application and at the support. However, if you hold out your forearm and hand rigidly and push down on the tips of your fingers, you will feel muscles and tendons reacting to the load to maintain equilibrium.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  CableStayCableStay

                  1,682724




                  1,682724























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.



                      Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.



                        Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.



                          Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The shear force has to continue along the beam until a point where it meets a force of equal magnitude and opposite direction to set it off, which in you case is the left hand support reaction.



                          Intuitively if you cut the beam at 1 cm from the load, at the left you have P1 force which has not been countered by any reaction yet, pushing this section down and you need to apply a balancing vertical force of P1 directed up, to keep it in equilibrium, otherwise it will fall down. Same thing if you cut the beam at 2,3,.. cm. So throughout the beam the shear continues until it has encountered the opposing force at the left support.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 3 hours ago









                          kamrankamran

                          4,7622511




                          4,7622511






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Engineering Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26862%2fwhy-does-concentrated-shear-force-on-a-beam-influence-the-whole-beam%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

                              Nässjö kommun Tettstader | Kjelder | NavigasjonsmenyeVIAFISNIGeoNamesMusicBrainz (area)

                              Kvitkval Innhaldsliste Taksonomi og utvikling | Utsjånad og levevis | Utbreiing | Åtferd |...