Would it be possible to rearrange a dragon's flight muscle to somewhat circumvent the square-cube law? ...
How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?
Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?
How to grep and cut numbes from a file and sum them
Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
Is a pteranodon too powerful as a beast companion for a beast master?
Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?
University's motivation for having tenure-track positions
Why is superheterodyning better than direct conversion?
How many people can fit inside Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?
Problems with Ubuntu mount /tmp
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
Difference between "generating set" and free product?
Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?
Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?
Short and long uuids under /dev/disk/by-uuid
RT6224D-based step down circuit yields 0V - why?
How does ice melt when immersed in water
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Take groceries in checked luggage
Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?
Hopping to infinity along a string of digits
Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?
Would it be possible to rearrange a dragon's flight muscle to somewhat circumvent the square-cube law?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The network's official Twitter account is up and running again. What content…Dragon forelimb placementWhat would happen if magic was constrained by the second law of thermodynamicsWhat issues as a result of square-cube law would a human scaled to the size of an ant face?Would it be possible to grow bamboo on the Earth's moon?Dragon's Blood - If it was a realistic animal what would be the color of its blood?What is the hardest wood possible, and where would this be a practical material?What would be the most addictive substance it is possible to make?What would be the possible benefits of pointed ears?Would it be possible to farm the energy from pulsars?Would a planet the size of Mercury with the gravity of Earth be scientifically possible?Giving dragons more flight muscle
$begingroup$
The square-cube law holds true only for objects that are similar. In evolution, you can't make big leaps forward, but since most fantasy worlds are created by gods or people who think they're gods, I'm free to abuse Intelligent design.
Dragons have six limbs, the 2 wings are situated near the front legs, but just far enough not to interfere. Their anatomy as of now is pretty much the same as avian wings and flight muscles.
That being said, assuming dragon bones are much stronger, thanks to some nanoscale engineering and a hint of graphene, how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
Note: Before we veer off into the deepest insanity, I was thinking more of the "If strength is the function of muscle cross-section, can't we just shorten the fibers and increase the cross-sectional area, like a boss?" path.
science-based dragons bio-mechanics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The square-cube law holds true only for objects that are similar. In evolution, you can't make big leaps forward, but since most fantasy worlds are created by gods or people who think they're gods, I'm free to abuse Intelligent design.
Dragons have six limbs, the 2 wings are situated near the front legs, but just far enough not to interfere. Their anatomy as of now is pretty much the same as avian wings and flight muscles.
That being said, assuming dragon bones are much stronger, thanks to some nanoscale engineering and a hint of graphene, how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
Note: Before we veer off into the deepest insanity, I was thinking more of the "If strength is the function of muscle cross-section, can't we just shorten the fibers and increase the cross-sectional area, like a boss?" path.
science-based dragons bio-mechanics
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Related to this question: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143396/…
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The square-cube law holds true only for objects that are similar. In evolution, you can't make big leaps forward, but since most fantasy worlds are created by gods or people who think they're gods, I'm free to abuse Intelligent design.
Dragons have six limbs, the 2 wings are situated near the front legs, but just far enough not to interfere. Their anatomy as of now is pretty much the same as avian wings and flight muscles.
That being said, assuming dragon bones are much stronger, thanks to some nanoscale engineering and a hint of graphene, how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
Note: Before we veer off into the deepest insanity, I was thinking more of the "If strength is the function of muscle cross-section, can't we just shorten the fibers and increase the cross-sectional area, like a boss?" path.
science-based dragons bio-mechanics
$endgroup$
The square-cube law holds true only for objects that are similar. In evolution, you can't make big leaps forward, but since most fantasy worlds are created by gods or people who think they're gods, I'm free to abuse Intelligent design.
Dragons have six limbs, the 2 wings are situated near the front legs, but just far enough not to interfere. Their anatomy as of now is pretty much the same as avian wings and flight muscles.
That being said, assuming dragon bones are much stronger, thanks to some nanoscale engineering and a hint of graphene, how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
Note: Before we veer off into the deepest insanity, I was thinking more of the "If strength is the function of muscle cross-section, can't we just shorten the fibers and increase the cross-sectional area, like a boss?" path.
science-based dragons bio-mechanics
science-based dragons bio-mechanics
edited 3 hours ago
Mephistopheles
asked 6 hours ago
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2292935
2,2292935
$begingroup$
Related to this question: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143396/…
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Related to this question: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143396/…
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related to this question: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143396/…
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related to this question: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143396/…
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When I was a teen it was common for us to have a 50 cc scooter which, by law, could not exceed the speed of 50 km/h. When some of us wanted to tune up the scooter and get more out of the engine, one of the trick was to change the carburetor or the exhaust (or both). (don't try this at home, going at 110 km/h on normal roads with something designed to go at 50 is not only illegal, but also mighty stupid and a fast way to have an early funeral)
This trick would have allowed the engine to output more power with the same volume of the cylinder and the same structure.
How does this apply to your dragons? Well, you don't need to redesign the muscles/engine, just increase the metabolism of the beast, allowing it to burn more nutrients and output more energy with the same structure.
Incidentally, this is the same trick used by birds, which allow them to be able to fly.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
1. Waste heat, though that's someone else's pet peeve. 2. What you're saying isn't wrong, but I'm looking for some way to restructure the muscle, ya' know "strength" is the function of the cross-section.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wow, this takes me back. I used to play with contact explosives and ballistic model rocketry using, um, well... black powder. Friends of mine solved their slow go-kart problems with a syringe full of alcohol and an open carburetor. It's a never-ending wonder that teenagers ever become adults.
$endgroup$
– JBH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Not just waste heat but also metabolites. It may be necessary to have an auxiliary circulatory system, and also auxiliary kidneys, to carry them away.
$endgroup$
– Spencer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This seems to be the reason pterosaurs could be so much larger than modern birds—the oxygen content peaked in Cretaceous period at about 1½ of current value, allowing faster metabolism.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
29 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your dragons are currently big pigeons: giant pectoralis for downstroke, presumably proportionately small supercoracoideus for upstroke. Background reading
But you could take advantage of graphene and the rule of cool and model your dragons on a unique bird: the hummingbird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_flight
Most birds that hover have high aspect ratio wings that are suited to
low speed flying. Hummingbirds are a unique exception – the most
accomplished hoverers of all birds. Hummingbird flight is different
from other bird flight in that the wing is extended throughout the
whole stroke, which is a symmetrical figure of eight, with the wing
producing lift on both the up- and down-stroke. Hummingbirds beat
their wings at some 43 times per second, while others may be as high
as 80 times per second.
Hummingbirds fly like insects. Their wings move with a sort of sculling motion, and the pectoralis and supercoracoideus are closer to symmetrical in their contributions. They generate vortices as part of their lift mechanism, which would be so cool for a dragon because it would generate dust devils close to the ground.
One could argue dragons are too big and heavy to fly like hummingbirds. I refer these naysayers above to "graphene and rule of cool" and suggest they devote their skeptical energies to the problems inherent in breathing fire.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Making them able to breathe fire is child's play. Though I'd prefer a long-range, precision strike breath-weapon with splash damage.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles - dragon lugeys.
$endgroup$
– Willk
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
U wot? speak english!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The question is about circumventing square-cube law, and you suggest violating even worse scaling law instead?
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
The pectoralis major connects to the arm bone, so I am going to offer a solution that is biologically plausible:
Due to some mutation, some dragons are born with thw front legs and the wings partially fused. This adds a lot of muscle power to each wing stroke.
Over millenia (or maybe longer spans), the dragons evolve to have only four limbs. The wings get ever more muscular, achieving your desired result.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I can abuse Intelligent design as much as I want, I clearly stated that.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course in birds the fore legs got changed to wings, and so was the case with pterosaurs.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143923%2fwould-it-be-possible-to-rearrange-a-dragons-flight-muscle-to-somewhat-circumven%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When I was a teen it was common for us to have a 50 cc scooter which, by law, could not exceed the speed of 50 km/h. When some of us wanted to tune up the scooter and get more out of the engine, one of the trick was to change the carburetor or the exhaust (or both). (don't try this at home, going at 110 km/h on normal roads with something designed to go at 50 is not only illegal, but also mighty stupid and a fast way to have an early funeral)
This trick would have allowed the engine to output more power with the same volume of the cylinder and the same structure.
How does this apply to your dragons? Well, you don't need to redesign the muscles/engine, just increase the metabolism of the beast, allowing it to burn more nutrients and output more energy with the same structure.
Incidentally, this is the same trick used by birds, which allow them to be able to fly.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
1. Waste heat, though that's someone else's pet peeve. 2. What you're saying isn't wrong, but I'm looking for some way to restructure the muscle, ya' know "strength" is the function of the cross-section.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wow, this takes me back. I used to play with contact explosives and ballistic model rocketry using, um, well... black powder. Friends of mine solved their slow go-kart problems with a syringe full of alcohol and an open carburetor. It's a never-ending wonder that teenagers ever become adults.
$endgroup$
– JBH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Not just waste heat but also metabolites. It may be necessary to have an auxiliary circulatory system, and also auxiliary kidneys, to carry them away.
$endgroup$
– Spencer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This seems to be the reason pterosaurs could be so much larger than modern birds—the oxygen content peaked in Cretaceous period at about 1½ of current value, allowing faster metabolism.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
29 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I was a teen it was common for us to have a 50 cc scooter which, by law, could not exceed the speed of 50 km/h. When some of us wanted to tune up the scooter and get more out of the engine, one of the trick was to change the carburetor or the exhaust (or both). (don't try this at home, going at 110 km/h on normal roads with something designed to go at 50 is not only illegal, but also mighty stupid and a fast way to have an early funeral)
This trick would have allowed the engine to output more power with the same volume of the cylinder and the same structure.
How does this apply to your dragons? Well, you don't need to redesign the muscles/engine, just increase the metabolism of the beast, allowing it to burn more nutrients and output more energy with the same structure.
Incidentally, this is the same trick used by birds, which allow them to be able to fly.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
1. Waste heat, though that's someone else's pet peeve. 2. What you're saying isn't wrong, but I'm looking for some way to restructure the muscle, ya' know "strength" is the function of the cross-section.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wow, this takes me back. I used to play with contact explosives and ballistic model rocketry using, um, well... black powder. Friends of mine solved their slow go-kart problems with a syringe full of alcohol and an open carburetor. It's a never-ending wonder that teenagers ever become adults.
$endgroup$
– JBH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Not just waste heat but also metabolites. It may be necessary to have an auxiliary circulatory system, and also auxiliary kidneys, to carry them away.
$endgroup$
– Spencer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This seems to be the reason pterosaurs could be so much larger than modern birds—the oxygen content peaked in Cretaceous period at about 1½ of current value, allowing faster metabolism.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
29 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I was a teen it was common for us to have a 50 cc scooter which, by law, could not exceed the speed of 50 km/h. When some of us wanted to tune up the scooter and get more out of the engine, one of the trick was to change the carburetor or the exhaust (or both). (don't try this at home, going at 110 km/h on normal roads with something designed to go at 50 is not only illegal, but also mighty stupid and a fast way to have an early funeral)
This trick would have allowed the engine to output more power with the same volume of the cylinder and the same structure.
How does this apply to your dragons? Well, you don't need to redesign the muscles/engine, just increase the metabolism of the beast, allowing it to burn more nutrients and output more energy with the same structure.
Incidentally, this is the same trick used by birds, which allow them to be able to fly.
$endgroup$
When I was a teen it was common for us to have a 50 cc scooter which, by law, could not exceed the speed of 50 km/h. When some of us wanted to tune up the scooter and get more out of the engine, one of the trick was to change the carburetor or the exhaust (or both). (don't try this at home, going at 110 km/h on normal roads with something designed to go at 50 is not only illegal, but also mighty stupid and a fast way to have an early funeral)
This trick would have allowed the engine to output more power with the same volume of the cylinder and the same structure.
How does this apply to your dragons? Well, you don't need to redesign the muscles/engine, just increase the metabolism of the beast, allowing it to burn more nutrients and output more energy with the same structure.
Incidentally, this is the same trick used by birds, which allow them to be able to fly.
answered 6 hours ago
L.Dutch♦L.Dutch
91.3k29211438
91.3k29211438
$begingroup$
1. Waste heat, though that's someone else's pet peeve. 2. What you're saying isn't wrong, but I'm looking for some way to restructure the muscle, ya' know "strength" is the function of the cross-section.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wow, this takes me back. I used to play with contact explosives and ballistic model rocketry using, um, well... black powder. Friends of mine solved their slow go-kart problems with a syringe full of alcohol and an open carburetor. It's a never-ending wonder that teenagers ever become adults.
$endgroup$
– JBH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Not just waste heat but also metabolites. It may be necessary to have an auxiliary circulatory system, and also auxiliary kidneys, to carry them away.
$endgroup$
– Spencer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This seems to be the reason pterosaurs could be so much larger than modern birds—the oxygen content peaked in Cretaceous period at about 1½ of current value, allowing faster metabolism.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
29 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1. Waste heat, though that's someone else's pet peeve. 2. What you're saying isn't wrong, but I'm looking for some way to restructure the muscle, ya' know "strength" is the function of the cross-section.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wow, this takes me back. I used to play with contact explosives and ballistic model rocketry using, um, well... black powder. Friends of mine solved their slow go-kart problems with a syringe full of alcohol and an open carburetor. It's a never-ending wonder that teenagers ever become adults.
$endgroup$
– JBH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Not just waste heat but also metabolites. It may be necessary to have an auxiliary circulatory system, and also auxiliary kidneys, to carry them away.
$endgroup$
– Spencer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This seems to be the reason pterosaurs could be so much larger than modern birds—the oxygen content peaked in Cretaceous period at about 1½ of current value, allowing faster metabolism.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
29 mins ago
$begingroup$
1. Waste heat, though that's someone else's pet peeve. 2. What you're saying isn't wrong, but I'm looking for some way to restructure the muscle, ya' know "strength" is the function of the cross-section.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
1. Waste heat, though that's someone else's pet peeve. 2. What you're saying isn't wrong, but I'm looking for some way to restructure the muscle, ya' know "strength" is the function of the cross-section.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Wow, this takes me back. I used to play with contact explosives and ballistic model rocketry using, um, well... black powder. Friends of mine solved their slow go-kart problems with a syringe full of alcohol and an open carburetor. It's a never-ending wonder that teenagers ever become adults.
$endgroup$
– JBH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow, this takes me back. I used to play with contact explosives and ballistic model rocketry using, um, well... black powder. Friends of mine solved their slow go-kart problems with a syringe full of alcohol and an open carburetor. It's a never-ending wonder that teenagers ever become adults.
$endgroup$
– JBH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Not just waste heat but also metabolites. It may be necessary to have an auxiliary circulatory system, and also auxiliary kidneys, to carry them away.
$endgroup$
– Spencer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Not just waste heat but also metabolites. It may be necessary to have an auxiliary circulatory system, and also auxiliary kidneys, to carry them away.
$endgroup$
– Spencer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This seems to be the reason pterosaurs could be so much larger than modern birds—the oxygen content peaked in Cretaceous period at about 1½ of current value, allowing faster metabolism.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
29 mins ago
$begingroup$
This seems to be the reason pterosaurs could be so much larger than modern birds—the oxygen content peaked in Cretaceous period at about 1½ of current value, allowing faster metabolism.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
29 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your dragons are currently big pigeons: giant pectoralis for downstroke, presumably proportionately small supercoracoideus for upstroke. Background reading
But you could take advantage of graphene and the rule of cool and model your dragons on a unique bird: the hummingbird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_flight
Most birds that hover have high aspect ratio wings that are suited to
low speed flying. Hummingbirds are a unique exception – the most
accomplished hoverers of all birds. Hummingbird flight is different
from other bird flight in that the wing is extended throughout the
whole stroke, which is a symmetrical figure of eight, with the wing
producing lift on both the up- and down-stroke. Hummingbirds beat
their wings at some 43 times per second, while others may be as high
as 80 times per second.
Hummingbirds fly like insects. Their wings move with a sort of sculling motion, and the pectoralis and supercoracoideus are closer to symmetrical in their contributions. They generate vortices as part of their lift mechanism, which would be so cool for a dragon because it would generate dust devils close to the ground.
One could argue dragons are too big and heavy to fly like hummingbirds. I refer these naysayers above to "graphene and rule of cool" and suggest they devote their skeptical energies to the problems inherent in breathing fire.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Making them able to breathe fire is child's play. Though I'd prefer a long-range, precision strike breath-weapon with splash damage.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles - dragon lugeys.
$endgroup$
– Willk
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
U wot? speak english!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The question is about circumventing square-cube law, and you suggest violating even worse scaling law instead?
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your dragons are currently big pigeons: giant pectoralis for downstroke, presumably proportionately small supercoracoideus for upstroke. Background reading
But you could take advantage of graphene and the rule of cool and model your dragons on a unique bird: the hummingbird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_flight
Most birds that hover have high aspect ratio wings that are suited to
low speed flying. Hummingbirds are a unique exception – the most
accomplished hoverers of all birds. Hummingbird flight is different
from other bird flight in that the wing is extended throughout the
whole stroke, which is a symmetrical figure of eight, with the wing
producing lift on both the up- and down-stroke. Hummingbirds beat
their wings at some 43 times per second, while others may be as high
as 80 times per second.
Hummingbirds fly like insects. Their wings move with a sort of sculling motion, and the pectoralis and supercoracoideus are closer to symmetrical in their contributions. They generate vortices as part of their lift mechanism, which would be so cool for a dragon because it would generate dust devils close to the ground.
One could argue dragons are too big and heavy to fly like hummingbirds. I refer these naysayers above to "graphene and rule of cool" and suggest they devote their skeptical energies to the problems inherent in breathing fire.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Making them able to breathe fire is child's play. Though I'd prefer a long-range, precision strike breath-weapon with splash damage.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles - dragon lugeys.
$endgroup$
– Willk
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
U wot? speak english!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The question is about circumventing square-cube law, and you suggest violating even worse scaling law instead?
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your dragons are currently big pigeons: giant pectoralis for downstroke, presumably proportionately small supercoracoideus for upstroke. Background reading
But you could take advantage of graphene and the rule of cool and model your dragons on a unique bird: the hummingbird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_flight
Most birds that hover have high aspect ratio wings that are suited to
low speed flying. Hummingbirds are a unique exception – the most
accomplished hoverers of all birds. Hummingbird flight is different
from other bird flight in that the wing is extended throughout the
whole stroke, which is a symmetrical figure of eight, with the wing
producing lift on both the up- and down-stroke. Hummingbirds beat
their wings at some 43 times per second, while others may be as high
as 80 times per second.
Hummingbirds fly like insects. Their wings move with a sort of sculling motion, and the pectoralis and supercoracoideus are closer to symmetrical in their contributions. They generate vortices as part of their lift mechanism, which would be so cool for a dragon because it would generate dust devils close to the ground.
One could argue dragons are too big and heavy to fly like hummingbirds. I refer these naysayers above to "graphene and rule of cool" and suggest they devote their skeptical energies to the problems inherent in breathing fire.
$endgroup$
Your dragons are currently big pigeons: giant pectoralis for downstroke, presumably proportionately small supercoracoideus for upstroke. Background reading
But you could take advantage of graphene and the rule of cool and model your dragons on a unique bird: the hummingbird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_flight
Most birds that hover have high aspect ratio wings that are suited to
low speed flying. Hummingbirds are a unique exception – the most
accomplished hoverers of all birds. Hummingbird flight is different
from other bird flight in that the wing is extended throughout the
whole stroke, which is a symmetrical figure of eight, with the wing
producing lift on both the up- and down-stroke. Hummingbirds beat
their wings at some 43 times per second, while others may be as high
as 80 times per second.
Hummingbirds fly like insects. Their wings move with a sort of sculling motion, and the pectoralis and supercoracoideus are closer to symmetrical in their contributions. They generate vortices as part of their lift mechanism, which would be so cool for a dragon because it would generate dust devils close to the ground.
One could argue dragons are too big and heavy to fly like hummingbirds. I refer these naysayers above to "graphene and rule of cool" and suggest they devote their skeptical energies to the problems inherent in breathing fire.
answered 4 hours ago
WillkWillk
117k28221489
117k28221489
1
$begingroup$
Making them able to breathe fire is child's play. Though I'd prefer a long-range, precision strike breath-weapon with splash damage.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles - dragon lugeys.
$endgroup$
– Willk
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
U wot? speak english!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The question is about circumventing square-cube law, and you suggest violating even worse scaling law instead?
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Making them able to breathe fire is child's play. Though I'd prefer a long-range, precision strike breath-weapon with splash damage.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles - dragon lugeys.
$endgroup$
– Willk
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
U wot? speak english!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The question is about circumventing square-cube law, and you suggest violating even worse scaling law instead?
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Making them able to breathe fire is child's play. Though I'd prefer a long-range, precision strike breath-weapon with splash damage.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Making them able to breathe fire is child's play. Though I'd prefer a long-range, precision strike breath-weapon with splash damage.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
4 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles - dragon lugeys.
$endgroup$
– Willk
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles - dragon lugeys.
$endgroup$
– Willk
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
U wot? speak english!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
U wot? speak english!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The question is about circumventing square-cube law, and you suggest violating even worse scaling law instead?
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The question is about circumventing square-cube law, and you suggest violating even worse scaling law instead?
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
The pectoralis major connects to the arm bone, so I am going to offer a solution that is biologically plausible:
Due to some mutation, some dragons are born with thw front legs and the wings partially fused. This adds a lot of muscle power to each wing stroke.
Over millenia (or maybe longer spans), the dragons evolve to have only four limbs. The wings get ever more muscular, achieving your desired result.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I can abuse Intelligent design as much as I want, I clearly stated that.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course in birds the fore legs got changed to wings, and so was the case with pterosaurs.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
The pectoralis major connects to the arm bone, so I am going to offer a solution that is biologically plausible:
Due to some mutation, some dragons are born with thw front legs and the wings partially fused. This adds a lot of muscle power to each wing stroke.
Over millenia (or maybe longer spans), the dragons evolve to have only four limbs. The wings get ever more muscular, achieving your desired result.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I can abuse Intelligent design as much as I want, I clearly stated that.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course in birds the fore legs got changed to wings, and so was the case with pterosaurs.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
The pectoralis major connects to the arm bone, so I am going to offer a solution that is biologically plausible:
Due to some mutation, some dragons are born with thw front legs and the wings partially fused. This adds a lot of muscle power to each wing stroke.
Over millenia (or maybe longer spans), the dragons evolve to have only four limbs. The wings get ever more muscular, achieving your desired result.
$endgroup$
how could the pectoralis major, and the bone connecting to it, be rearranged to produce more power for the same mass?
The pectoralis major connects to the arm bone, so I am going to offer a solution that is biologically plausible:
Due to some mutation, some dragons are born with thw front legs and the wings partially fused. This adds a lot of muscle power to each wing stroke.
Over millenia (or maybe longer spans), the dragons evolve to have only four limbs. The wings get ever more muscular, achieving your desired result.
answered 54 mins ago
RenanRenan
52.9k15120265
52.9k15120265
$begingroup$
I can abuse Intelligent design as much as I want, I clearly stated that.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course in birds the fore legs got changed to wings, and so was the case with pterosaurs.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I can abuse Intelligent design as much as I want, I clearly stated that.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course in birds the fore legs got changed to wings, and so was the case with pterosaurs.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
36 mins ago
$begingroup$
I can abuse Intelligent design as much as I want, I clearly stated that.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
I can abuse Intelligent design as much as I want, I clearly stated that.
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course in birds the fore legs got changed to wings, and so was the case with pterosaurs.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
36 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course in birds the fore legs got changed to wings, and so was the case with pterosaurs.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143923%2fwould-it-be-possible-to-rearrange-a-dragons-flight-muscle-to-somewhat-circumven%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Related to this question: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143396/…
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
3 hours ago