“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is...

Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'

How to mute a string and play another at the same time

Why these surprising proportionalities of integrals involving odd zeta values?

“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is there no article before “passengers”?

"Destructive force" carried by a B-52?

What combination of kingdom cards makes for the fewest number of turns to end the game?

Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem

Is there a way to convert Wolfram Language expression to string?

How is an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ) called?

What's the connection between Mr. Nancy and fried chicken?

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

Etymology of 見舞い

lm and glm function in R

Why "Go Out and Learn"

What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?

Assertions In A Mock Callout Test

How to create a command for the "strange m" symbol in latex?

Is Bran literally the world's memory?

Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?

Network Switch Upgrade Planning questions

Coin Game with infinite paradox

How do I overlay a PNG over two videos (one video overlays another) in one command using FFmpeg?



“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is there no article before “passengers”?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Contributor's Guide to English Language LearnersArticle Confusion Again! Why is there an 'a' instead of a 'the'?Can “the + noun” be a general reference?appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix — why is there no definite article in front of “inflammation”?Should I use “a” or “the” to designate the particular one I'm going to talk about?Why is there no article in the sentence “Then came number”?Definite article in “Police were able to find out where the father lived from _THE_ information the child provided”British colonies or the British colonies?“The Jesus who said” - why is there a definite article before the proper name “Jesus”?particularizing attribute with indefinite articleWhy is “Reports” in the sentence below without the article “The”?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










share|improve this question





























    1















    After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



    P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



      P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










      share|improve this question














      After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



      P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.







      articles






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      ZakZak

      6371311




      6371311






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






          share|improve this answer































            2














            The sentence




            Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




            is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




            After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




            Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




            After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




            Now the implication is otherwise.



            When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






            share|improve this answer
























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "481"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206580%2fsince-the-train-was-delayed-for-more-than-an-hour-passengers-were-given-a-full%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






              share|improve this answer




























                2














                It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






                share|improve this answer


























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






                  share|improve this answer













                  It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  anoukanouk

                  1,763414




                  1,763414

























                      2














                      The sentence




                      Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                      is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                      After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                      Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                      After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                      Now the implication is otherwise.



                      When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        2














                        The sentence




                        Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                        is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                        After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                        Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                        After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                        Now the implication is otherwise.



                        When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          2












                          2








                          2







                          The sentence




                          Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                          is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                          Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                          Now the implication is otherwise.



                          When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                          share|improve this answer













                          The sentence




                          Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                          is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                          Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                          Now the implication is otherwise.



                          When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 59 mins ago









                          David SiegelDavid Siegel

                          2,984316




                          2,984316






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206580%2fsince-the-train-was-delayed-for-more-than-an-hour-passengers-were-given-a-full%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

                              Nässjö kommun Tettstader | Kjelder | NavigasjonsmenyeVIAFISNIGeoNamesMusicBrainz (area)

                              Kvitkval Innhaldsliste Taksonomi og utvikling | Utsjånad og levevis | Utbreiing | Åtferd |...