What would happen if Voldemort kept creating Horcruxes? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy...
What is meant by a M next to a roman numeral?
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?
How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?
What's the point of interval inversion?
Horror movie/show or scene where a horse creature opens its mouth really wide and devours a man in a stables
'Given that' in a matrix
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"
How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?
Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?
What is the point of a new vote on May's deal when the indicative votes suggest she will not win?
Is it a good idea to use COLUMN AS (left([Another_Column],(4)) instead of LEFT in the select?
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
How do I construct this japanese bowl?
Apart from "berlinern", do any other German dialects have a corresponding verb?
Are there languages with no euphemisms?
How to write the block matrix in LaTex?
Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?
How to use tikz in fbox?
If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?
Explicit solution of a Hamiltonian system
How can I open an app using Terminal?
How can I quit an app using Terminal?
What would happen if Voldemort kept creating Horcruxes?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy Didn't Voldemort Monitor His Horcruxes?What Effect Would the Dementor's Kiss Have on Voldemort Prior to the Destruction of His Horcruxes?Who did Voldemort kill to create the horcruxes?If you were to attempt to kill Voldemort, would that destroy one of his Horcruxes?Voldemort and his horcruxes: protected at 7, destroyed at 8?How was Voldemort supposed to regenerate from a Horcrux?Did Voldemort know what would happen when he died?Would Voldemort have lost his powers if he hadn't made so many horcruxes?What did Voldemort plan to do if any Horcruxes remained after his body was killed?Why didn't Snape work out Voldemort had Horcruxes?
I know there is a limit on how much Voldemort could tear his soul, but if he surpassed the limit his soul could handle, and he died: wouldn't he just be resurrected by one of his horcruxes yet again? Is it some kind of loophole?
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
add a comment |
I know there is a limit on how much Voldemort could tear his soul, but if he surpassed the limit his soul could handle, and he died: wouldn't he just be resurrected by one of his horcruxes yet again? Is it some kind of loophole?
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
3
The real issue is not dying, but having his personality fragmented to a point where his existence can no longer be sustained. He would become a mere spirit of malice that gnaws itself in the shadows, but cannot again grow or take shape.
– void_ptr
Aug 22 '17 at 18:19
3
This question is not primarily opinion-based - the answer is based on the books.
– TimSparrow
Aug 23 '17 at 9:56
add a comment |
I know there is a limit on how much Voldemort could tear his soul, but if he surpassed the limit his soul could handle, and he died: wouldn't he just be resurrected by one of his horcruxes yet again? Is it some kind of loophole?
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
I know there is a limit on how much Voldemort could tear his soul, but if he surpassed the limit his soul could handle, and he died: wouldn't he just be resurrected by one of his horcruxes yet again? Is it some kind of loophole?
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
asked Aug 22 '17 at 18:06
Vadzim SavenokVadzim Savenok
8431421
8431421
3
The real issue is not dying, but having his personality fragmented to a point where his existence can no longer be sustained. He would become a mere spirit of malice that gnaws itself in the shadows, but cannot again grow or take shape.
– void_ptr
Aug 22 '17 at 18:19
3
This question is not primarily opinion-based - the answer is based on the books.
– TimSparrow
Aug 23 '17 at 9:56
add a comment |
3
The real issue is not dying, but having his personality fragmented to a point where his existence can no longer be sustained. He would become a mere spirit of malice that gnaws itself in the shadows, but cannot again grow or take shape.
– void_ptr
Aug 22 '17 at 18:19
3
This question is not primarily opinion-based - the answer is based on the books.
– TimSparrow
Aug 23 '17 at 9:56
3
3
The real issue is not dying, but having his personality fragmented to a point where his existence can no longer be sustained. He would become a mere spirit of malice that gnaws itself in the shadows, but cannot again grow or take shape.
– void_ptr
Aug 22 '17 at 18:19
The real issue is not dying, but having his personality fragmented to a point where his existence can no longer be sustained. He would become a mere spirit of malice that gnaws itself in the shadows, but cannot again grow or take shape.
– void_ptr
Aug 22 '17 at 18:19
3
3
This question is not primarily opinion-based - the answer is based on the books.
– TimSparrow
Aug 23 '17 at 9:56
This question is not primarily opinion-based - the answer is based on the books.
– TimSparrow
Aug 23 '17 at 9:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Creating multiple Horcruxes made his soul unstable and more likely to break apart.
The Dark Lord couldn't create too many Horcruxes. The more he created, the more unstable it became, so he wouldn't be able to create unlimited Horcruxes. He'd have to limit it somewhat. Creating Horcruxes makes the soul more and more unstable with each new Horcrux. The book that provides the instructions for making Horcruxes warns about this.
“And the more I’ve read about them,’ said Hermione, ‘the more horrible they seem, and the less I can believe that he actually made six. It warns in this book how unstable you make the rest of your soul by ripping it, and that’s just by making one Horcrux!” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 6 (The Ghoul in Pyjamas)*
In fact, he had already made his soul unstable enough before even making Nagini a Horcrux, that a piece unintentionally broke off and embedded itself in Harry.
“He had rendered his soul so unstable that it broke apart when he committed those acts of unspeakable evil, the murder of your parents, the attempted killing of a child. But what escaped from that room was even less than he knew. He left more than his body behind. He left part of himself latched to you, the would-be victim who had survived.” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 35 (Kings Cross)*
1
Quickly accepted before question is closed looks around fidgetly
– Vadzim Savenok
Aug 22 '17 at 21:11
Were you trying to italicize the titles, or do the asterisks represent something else?
– Alex
Mar 11 at 15:00
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f167799%2fwhat-would-happen-if-voldemort-kept-creating-horcruxes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Creating multiple Horcruxes made his soul unstable and more likely to break apart.
The Dark Lord couldn't create too many Horcruxes. The more he created, the more unstable it became, so he wouldn't be able to create unlimited Horcruxes. He'd have to limit it somewhat. Creating Horcruxes makes the soul more and more unstable with each new Horcrux. The book that provides the instructions for making Horcruxes warns about this.
“And the more I’ve read about them,’ said Hermione, ‘the more horrible they seem, and the less I can believe that he actually made six. It warns in this book how unstable you make the rest of your soul by ripping it, and that’s just by making one Horcrux!” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 6 (The Ghoul in Pyjamas)*
In fact, he had already made his soul unstable enough before even making Nagini a Horcrux, that a piece unintentionally broke off and embedded itself in Harry.
“He had rendered his soul so unstable that it broke apart when he committed those acts of unspeakable evil, the murder of your parents, the attempted killing of a child. But what escaped from that room was even less than he knew. He left more than his body behind. He left part of himself latched to you, the would-be victim who had survived.” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 35 (Kings Cross)*
1
Quickly accepted before question is closed looks around fidgetly
– Vadzim Savenok
Aug 22 '17 at 21:11
Were you trying to italicize the titles, or do the asterisks represent something else?
– Alex
Mar 11 at 15:00
add a comment |
Creating multiple Horcruxes made his soul unstable and more likely to break apart.
The Dark Lord couldn't create too many Horcruxes. The more he created, the more unstable it became, so he wouldn't be able to create unlimited Horcruxes. He'd have to limit it somewhat. Creating Horcruxes makes the soul more and more unstable with each new Horcrux. The book that provides the instructions for making Horcruxes warns about this.
“And the more I’ve read about them,’ said Hermione, ‘the more horrible they seem, and the less I can believe that he actually made six. It warns in this book how unstable you make the rest of your soul by ripping it, and that’s just by making one Horcrux!” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 6 (The Ghoul in Pyjamas)*
In fact, he had already made his soul unstable enough before even making Nagini a Horcrux, that a piece unintentionally broke off and embedded itself in Harry.
“He had rendered his soul so unstable that it broke apart when he committed those acts of unspeakable evil, the murder of your parents, the attempted killing of a child. But what escaped from that room was even less than he knew. He left more than his body behind. He left part of himself latched to you, the would-be victim who had survived.” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 35 (Kings Cross)*
1
Quickly accepted before question is closed looks around fidgetly
– Vadzim Savenok
Aug 22 '17 at 21:11
Were you trying to italicize the titles, or do the asterisks represent something else?
– Alex
Mar 11 at 15:00
add a comment |
Creating multiple Horcruxes made his soul unstable and more likely to break apart.
The Dark Lord couldn't create too many Horcruxes. The more he created, the more unstable it became, so he wouldn't be able to create unlimited Horcruxes. He'd have to limit it somewhat. Creating Horcruxes makes the soul more and more unstable with each new Horcrux. The book that provides the instructions for making Horcruxes warns about this.
“And the more I’ve read about them,’ said Hermione, ‘the more horrible they seem, and the less I can believe that he actually made six. It warns in this book how unstable you make the rest of your soul by ripping it, and that’s just by making one Horcrux!” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 6 (The Ghoul in Pyjamas)*
In fact, he had already made his soul unstable enough before even making Nagini a Horcrux, that a piece unintentionally broke off and embedded itself in Harry.
“He had rendered his soul so unstable that it broke apart when he committed those acts of unspeakable evil, the murder of your parents, the attempted killing of a child. But what escaped from that room was even less than he knew. He left more than his body behind. He left part of himself latched to you, the would-be victim who had survived.” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 35 (Kings Cross)*
Creating multiple Horcruxes made his soul unstable and more likely to break apart.
The Dark Lord couldn't create too many Horcruxes. The more he created, the more unstable it became, so he wouldn't be able to create unlimited Horcruxes. He'd have to limit it somewhat. Creating Horcruxes makes the soul more and more unstable with each new Horcrux. The book that provides the instructions for making Horcruxes warns about this.
“And the more I’ve read about them,’ said Hermione, ‘the more horrible they seem, and the less I can believe that he actually made six. It warns in this book how unstable you make the rest of your soul by ripping it, and that’s just by making one Horcrux!” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 6 (The Ghoul in Pyjamas)*
In fact, he had already made his soul unstable enough before even making Nagini a Horcrux, that a piece unintentionally broke off and embedded itself in Harry.
“He had rendered his soul so unstable that it broke apart when he committed those acts of unspeakable evil, the murder of your parents, the attempted killing of a child. But what escaped from that room was even less than he knew. He left more than his body behind. He left part of himself latched to you, the would-be victim who had survived.” - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 35 (Kings Cross)*
answered Aug 22 '17 at 20:59
BellatrixBellatrix
77.7k15332387
77.7k15332387
1
Quickly accepted before question is closed looks around fidgetly
– Vadzim Savenok
Aug 22 '17 at 21:11
Were you trying to italicize the titles, or do the asterisks represent something else?
– Alex
Mar 11 at 15:00
add a comment |
1
Quickly accepted before question is closed looks around fidgetly
– Vadzim Savenok
Aug 22 '17 at 21:11
Were you trying to italicize the titles, or do the asterisks represent something else?
– Alex
Mar 11 at 15:00
1
1
Quickly accepted before question is closed looks around fidgetly
– Vadzim Savenok
Aug 22 '17 at 21:11
Quickly accepted before question is closed looks around fidgetly
– Vadzim Savenok
Aug 22 '17 at 21:11
Were you trying to italicize the titles, or do the asterisks represent something else?
– Alex
Mar 11 at 15:00
Were you trying to italicize the titles, or do the asterisks represent something else?
– Alex
Mar 11 at 15:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f167799%2fwhat-would-happen-if-voldemort-kept-creating-horcruxes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
The real issue is not dying, but having his personality fragmented to a point where his existence can no longer be sustained. He would become a mere spirit of malice that gnaws itself in the shadows, but cannot again grow or take shape.
– void_ptr
Aug 22 '17 at 18:19
3
This question is not primarily opinion-based - the answer is based on the books.
– TimSparrow
Aug 23 '17 at 9:56