Irreducibility of a simple polynomialShow $x^6 + 1.5x^5 + 3x - 4.5$ is irreducible in $mathbb Q[x]$.Determine...

How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Print name if parameter passed to function

Time travel short story where a man arrives in the late 19th century in a time machine and then sends the machine back into the past

Hide Select Output from T-SQL

Coordinate position not precise

At which point does a character regain all their Hit Dice?

The plural of 'stomach"

There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

What would be the benefits of having both a state and local currencies?

Modulo 2 binary long division in European notation

Star/Wye electrical connection math symbol

The baby cries all morning

Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?

Lay out the Carpet

Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?

Personal Teleportation as a Weapon

Is there a measurement for the vocal speed of a song?

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

How could Frankenstein get the parts for his _second_ creature?



Irreducibility of a simple polynomial


Show $x^6 + 1.5x^5 + 3x - 4.5$ is irreducible in $mathbb Q[x]$.Determine whether the polynomial $x^2-12$ in $mathbb Z[x]$ satisfies an Eisenstein criterion for irreducibility over $mathbb Q$Proving Irreducibility of $x^4-16x^3+20x^2+12$ in $mathbb Q[x]$Constructibility of roots of a polynomialEisenstein's criterion for polynomials in Z mod pProving irreducibility; What is this method and what is the logic behind it?Irreducibility of special cyclotomic polynomial.Irreducibility of a Polynomial after a substitutionIrreducibility of Non-monic Quartic Polynomials in Q[x]Irreducible monic polynomial in $mathbb{Q}[x]$













3












$begingroup$


For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$.



What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.



For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.



A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{ai})$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.






abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$


For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$.



What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.



For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.



A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{ai})$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.






abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    1 hour ago
















3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$.



What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.



For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.



A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{ai})$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.






abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$.



What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.



For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.



A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{ai})$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.






abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials




abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









JonHalesJonHales

520311




520311








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    1 hour ago
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    1 hour ago










2




2




$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:



$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$



We need:



$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt{2a}$$



But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:



$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$



Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
    $endgroup$
    – Eureka
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan MacBrough
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    58 mins ago



















2












$begingroup$

Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt{2a}x)^2=
(x^2-sqrt{2a}x+a)(x^2+sqrt{2a}x+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbb{R}$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbb{Q}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163711%2firreducibility-of-a-simple-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:



    $$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$



    We need:



    $$2a-b^2=0$$
    $$b=sqrt{2a}$$



    But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:



    $$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$



    Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
      $endgroup$
      – Sil
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
      $endgroup$
      – Eureka
      1 hour ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ethan MacBrough
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
      $endgroup$
      – Sil
      58 mins ago
















    4












    $begingroup$

    Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:



    $$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$



    We need:



    $$2a-b^2=0$$
    $$b=sqrt{2a}$$



    But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:



    $$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$



    Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
      $endgroup$
      – Sil
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
      $endgroup$
      – Eureka
      1 hour ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ethan MacBrough
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
      $endgroup$
      – Sil
      58 mins ago














    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:



    $$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$



    We need:



    $$2a-b^2=0$$
    $$b=sqrt{2a}$$



    But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:



    $$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$



    Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$



    Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:



    $$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$



    We need:



    $$2a-b^2=0$$
    $$b=sqrt{2a}$$



    But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:



    $$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$



    Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.







    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 1 hour ago









    EurekaEureka

    22611




    22611




    New contributor




    Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Eureka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • $begingroup$
      I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
      $endgroup$
      – Sil
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
      $endgroup$
      – Eureka
      1 hour ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ethan MacBrough
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
      $endgroup$
      – Sil
      58 mins ago


















    • $begingroup$
      I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
      $endgroup$
      – Sil
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
      $endgroup$
      – Eureka
      1 hour ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ethan MacBrough
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
      $endgroup$
      – Sil
      58 mins ago
















    $begingroup$
    I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    @Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
    $endgroup$
    – Eureka
    1 hour ago






    $begingroup$
    @Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
    $endgroup$
    – Eureka
    1 hour ago






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan MacBrough
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    @Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan MacBrough
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    @EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    58 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Sil
    58 mins ago











    2












    $begingroup$

    Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
    $$
    x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt{2a}x)^2=
    (x^2-sqrt{2a}x+a)(x^2+sqrt{2a}x+a)
    $$
    and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbb{R}$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbb{Q}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
      $$
      x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt{2a}x)^2=
      (x^2-sqrt{2a}x+a)(x^2+sqrt{2a}x+a)
      $$
      and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbb{R}$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbb{Q}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
        $$
        x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt{2a}x)^2=
        (x^2-sqrt{2a}x+a)(x^2+sqrt{2a}x+a)
        $$
        and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbb{R}$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbb{Q}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
        $$
        x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt{2a}x)^2=
        (x^2-sqrt{2a}x+a)(x^2+sqrt{2a}x+a)
        $$
        and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbb{R}$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbb{Q}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        egregegreg

        185k1486206




        185k1486206






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163711%2firreducibility-of-a-simple-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

            Image
            Tidlegare republikkarSkipingar i 1433Kommunar i SchwyzDistrikt i SchwyzNedleggingar i 1798Stader ved Vierwaldstättersee kommunekantonenSchwyzSveitskm²VierwaldstätterseeLauerz Gersau Kommunevåpenet til Gersau Plassering Styresmakter Land   Sveits Kanton kantonen Schwyz Distrikt Gersau Språk tysk Geografi Flatevidd  - kommune 23,70 km² Innbyggjarar  - kommune (desember 2010)    - folketettleik 2 094   88,4 /km² Koordinatar 46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E  Koordinatar: 46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E  Høgd over havet 435 moh Diverse annan informasjon Postnummer 6442 Nettstad: www.gersau.ch Freistaat und Republik Gersau Fristaten og republikken Gersau By-republikk og alliert protektorat i Det gamle sveitsiske eidsforundet ←   ← 1433–1798 1814–1818 →   → Hovudstad Gersau Styreform Republikk Historisk periode Tidleg moderne tid  - Kjøpte fridom frå ...
            Read more

            Nässjö kommun Tettstader | Kjelder | NavigasjonsmenyeVIAFISNIGeoNamesMusicBrainz (area)

            Image
            Nässjö kommunKommunar i Jönköpings län svenskeJönköpings länAdministrasjonssenterNässjöAneby kommunEksjö kommunVetlanda kommunSävsjö kommuneVaggeryd kommuneJönköping kommunejernbaneknutepunktBackyard BabiesEidsbergtettstader31. desember2005 Nässjö kommun kommune Kommunevåpen Land   Sverige Len Jönköpings län Landskap Småland Areal 988,49 km²  - land 930,29 km²  - vatn 58,2 km² Folketal 29 375 Wikimedia Commons: Nässjö Municipality Nässjö kommune ligg i det svenske länet Jönköpings län. Administrasjonssenter i kommunen er Nässjö. Kommunen grensar til Aneby kommun i nord, Eksjö kommun og Vetlanda kommun i aust, Sävsjö kommune og Vaggeryd kommune i sør og Jönköping kommune i vest. Kommunen er kjend som jernbaneknutepunkt, og som heimstaden til rockebandet Backyard Babies. Nässjö er venskapskommune med Eidsberg. Nässjö sentrum sett frå vasstårnet. Tettstader | Nässjö kommune har tol...
            Read more

            Kvitkval Innhaldsliste Taksonomi og utvikling | Utsjånad og levevis | Utbreiing | Åtferd |...

            Image
            Nær truga artarPattedyr i NoregNarkvalfamilien tannkvalarktiskenarkvalenmiocenkvalendelfinanetannkvalarLatinbiosonarenekkolokaliseringisbjørnenspekkhoggarinuittarArktisNew YorkNord-AmerikaEuropaJapan Kvitkval Status i verda: Nær truga Status i Noreg: Datamangel Kvitkval Systematikk Domene: Eukaryota Rike: Animalia Rekkje: Chordata Underrekkje: Vertebrata Klasse: Mammalia Orden: Cetaceae Familie: Monodontidae Slekt: Delphinapterus Art: D. leucas Vitskapleg namn Delphinapterus leucas Pallas, 1776 Kvitkval er ein tannkval som lever i arktiske og subarktiske område. Innhaldsliste 1 Taksonomi og utvikling 2 Utsjånad og levevis 3 Utbreiing 4 Åtferd 5 Bestandsstorleik og menneskeleg påverknad 6 Kjelder Taksonomi og utvikling | Kvitkvalen vart første gongen skildra av Peter Simon Pallas i 1776. Han er medlem av Monodontidae -familien saman med narkvalen. D...
            Read more