The weakest link Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the...
Which big number is bigger?
How long after the last departure shall the airport stay open for an emergency return?
Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?
All ASCII characters with a given bit count
Why do distances seem to matter in the Foundation world?
Israeli soda type drink
Map material from china not allowed to leave the country
Is this homebrew arcane communication device abusable?
Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Did the Roman Empire have penal colonies?
Why does Arg'[1. + I] return -0.5?
How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?
What is this word supposed to be?
Multiple options vs single option UI
How to keep bees out of canned beverages?
What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?
Scheduling based problem
A faster way to compute the largest prime factor
What to do with someone that cheated their way through university and a PhD program?
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer
The weakest link
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraTrapped in my CellarFinding the number of ways of crossing a riverThirty genuine and seventy fake coinsEvaporating coins212 weights of 1 gramMinimum number of tries to find the balance!Lots of Gold Stacks and a Balance Scale30 fake coins out of 99 coins1 Fake Coin among N Amount of coinsWhich is heavier, the heaviest of the light or the lightest of the heavy?
$begingroup$
I've gotten this riddle and have been struggling with solving it:
Suppose you have 20 stones which have different weights [0 ... n] . You have no way of measuring the weight of any stone individually, instead you can only measure them by putting 10 on each side of a balance. After doing this you see which "group" of stones is heavier. You can do this only 10 times in total. You can also switch the stones from either side to the other as much as you want between the measurements.
Your task is to find a stone for which you can be certain is not the lightest of them all.
All the stones are marked, so you always know which is which. Their appearance or anything similar does not help you with to determine their weight, the only way you can do it is by putting it on the balance.
mathematics
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've gotten this riddle and have been struggling with solving it:
Suppose you have 20 stones which have different weights [0 ... n] . You have no way of measuring the weight of any stone individually, instead you can only measure them by putting 10 on each side of a balance. After doing this you see which "group" of stones is heavier. You can do this only 10 times in total. You can also switch the stones from either side to the other as much as you want between the measurements.
Your task is to find a stone for which you can be certain is not the lightest of them all.
All the stones are marked, so you always know which is which. Their appearance or anything similar does not help you with to determine their weight, the only way you can do it is by putting it on the balance.
mathematics
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've gotten this riddle and have been struggling with solving it:
Suppose you have 20 stones which have different weights [0 ... n] . You have no way of measuring the weight of any stone individually, instead you can only measure them by putting 10 on each side of a balance. After doing this you see which "group" of stones is heavier. You can do this only 10 times in total. You can also switch the stones from either side to the other as much as you want between the measurements.
Your task is to find a stone for which you can be certain is not the lightest of them all.
All the stones are marked, so you always know which is which. Their appearance or anything similar does not help you with to determine their weight, the only way you can do it is by putting it on the balance.
mathematics
New contributor
$endgroup$
I've gotten this riddle and have been struggling with solving it:
Suppose you have 20 stones which have different weights [0 ... n] . You have no way of measuring the weight of any stone individually, instead you can only measure them by putting 10 on each side of a balance. After doing this you see which "group" of stones is heavier. You can do this only 10 times in total. You can also switch the stones from either side to the other as much as you want between the measurements.
Your task is to find a stone for which you can be certain is not the lightest of them all.
All the stones are marked, so you always know which is which. Their appearance or anything similar does not help you with to determine their weight, the only way you can do it is by putting it on the balance.
mathematics
mathematics
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
Brandon_J
3,873447
3,873447
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
podloga123podloga123
361
361
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Measure 10 and 10.
In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.
At some point, the balance turns around.
The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.
If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's how to do it:
Step one:
make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.
Then,
Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
If the scale does not tip differently, then
switch again.
Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,
then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
and you have your answer!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83188%2fthe-weakest-link%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Measure 10 and 10.
In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.
At some point, the balance turns around.
The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.
If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Measure 10 and 10.
In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.
At some point, the balance turns around.
The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.
If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Measure 10 and 10.
In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.
At some point, the balance turns around.
The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.
If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.
$endgroup$
Measure 10 and 10.
In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.
At some point, the balance turns around.
The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.
If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.
answered 3 hours ago
HermesHermes
4207
4207
$begingroup$
Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's how to do it:
Step one:
make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.
Then,
Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
If the scale does not tip differently, then
switch again.
Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,
then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
and you have your answer!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's how to do it:
Step one:
make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.
Then,
Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
If the scale does not tip differently, then
switch again.
Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,
then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
and you have your answer!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's how to do it:
Step one:
make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.
Then,
Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
If the scale does not tip differently, then
switch again.
Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,
then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
and you have your answer!
$endgroup$
Here's how to do it:
Step one:
make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.
Then,
Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
If the scale does not tip differently, then
switch again.
Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,
then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.
and you have your answer!
answered 3 hours ago
Brandon_JBrandon_J
3,873447
3,873447
add a comment |
add a comment |
podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83188%2fthe-weakest-link%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown