Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees? The Next CEO of Stack...

What day is it again?

A hang glider, sudden unexpected lift to 25,000 feet altitude, what could do this?

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

How dangerous is XSS

Free fall ellipse or parabola?

Find a path from s to t using as few red nodes as possible

What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?

How do I secure a TV wall mount?

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

Can a PhD from a non-TU9 German university become a professor in a TU9 university?

Gauss' Posthumous Publications?

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Create custom note boxes

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?

Physiological effects of huge anime eyes

Compilation of a 2d array and a 1d array

Why was Sir Cadogan fired?

Find the majority element, which appears more than half the time

Raspberry pi 3 B with Ubuntu 18.04 server arm64: what pi version

Which acid/base does a strong base/acid react when added to a buffer solution?

Is there a rule of thumb for determining the amount one should accept for of a settlement offer?

Man transported from Alternate World into ours by a Neutrino Detector

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?



Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAnonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy do we make a blessing on the blossoming of fruit trees (birkat hailanot)?Why is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Why is there such fervor to say the blessing on blossoming fruit trees?Who authored the topic - division headings in the Shulchan Aruch?Why isn't maakeh in the Tur?5th part of the shulchan aruchWhat is the Shulchan Aruch Ha'Arizal?Consistent philosophy in the Shulchan AruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch












3















Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)






halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    It's not the only thing missing

    – Double AA♦
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    @DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...

    – רבות מחשבות
    3 hours ago
















3















Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)






halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    It's not the only thing missing

    – Double AA♦
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    @DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...

    – רבות מחשבות
    3 hours ago














3












3








3








Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)






halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur







share|improve this question
















Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)






halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur




halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







רבות מחשבות

















asked 4 hours ago









רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות

14.6k129122




14.6k129122








  • 1





    It's not the only thing missing

    – Double AA♦
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    @DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...

    – רבות מחשבות
    3 hours ago














  • 1





    It's not the only thing missing

    – Double AA♦
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    @DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...

    – רבות מחשבות
    3 hours ago








1




1





It's not the only thing missing

– Double AA♦
3 hours ago





It's not the only thing missing

– Double AA♦
3 hours ago




2




2





@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...

– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago





@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...

– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:



Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159




גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור



There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.







share|improve this answer































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:



    Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159




    גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור



    There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.







    share|improve this answer




























      2














      R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:



      Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159




      גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור



      There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.







      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:



        Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159




        גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור



        There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.







        share|improve this answer













        R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:



        Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159




        גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור



        There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        AlexAlex

        22.9k156130




        22.9k156130















            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the “three and three hundred thousand syndrome”?Who wrote the book Arena?What five creatures were...

            Image
            What happens when the centripetal force is equal and opposite to the centrifugal force? Why is "la Gestapo" feminine? Nested Dynamic SOQL Query How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes? Exposing a company lying about themselves in a tightly knit industry: Is my career at risk on the long run? Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule? Why are there no stars visible in cislunar space? categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant Do I need an EFI partition for each 18.04 ubuntu I have on my HD? What are the consequences of changing the number of hours in ...
            Read more

            Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

            Image
            Tidlegare republikkarSkipingar i 1433Kommunar i SchwyzDistrikt i SchwyzNedleggingar i 1798Stader ved Vierwaldstättersee kommunekantonenSchwyzSveitskm²VierwaldstätterseeLauerz Gersau Kommunevåpenet til Gersau Plassering Styresmakter Land   Sveits Kanton kantonen Schwyz Distrikt Gersau Språk tysk Geografi Flatevidd  - kommune 23,70 km² Innbyggjarar  - kommune (desember 2010)    - folketettleik 2 094   88,4 /km² Koordinatar 46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E  Koordinatar: 46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E  Høgd over havet 435 moh Diverse annan informasjon Postnummer 6442 Nettstad: www.gersau.ch Freistaat und Republik Gersau Fristaten og republikken Gersau By-republikk og alliert protektorat i Det gamle sveitsiske eidsforundet ←   ← 1433–1798 1814–1818 →   → Hovudstad Gersau Styreform Republikk Historisk periode Tidleg moderne tid  - Kjøpte fridom frå ...
            Read more

            Hestehale Innhaldsliste Hestehale på kvinner | Hestehale på menn | Galleri | Sjå òg |...

            Image
            Frisyrar frisyrehårhårstrikkhårklemmerøyrethesthovudverkeuropeisk motejobbtreningfletterparykkarungdomsopprørmotkulturmusikararmotorsykkelentusiastarpolitietpolitiskforretningverksemdfiskeflette Hestehale sett bakfrå. Hestehale på ein mannleg indianarleiar. Hestehale er ein frisyre der ein samlar det meste eller alt av langt hår [1] i bakhovudet med ein hårstrikk eller liknande. Avhengig av mote kan det òg vere vanleg å sette opp hestehalen med hårklemmer eller å ha hestehalen hengande på den eine sida av hovudet ved å samle håret ved øyret. Hestehale er ein vanleg frisyre for jenter og for gutar med langt hår. Han har fått namnet sitt etter likskapen med halen på ein hest. For stramme hestehaler kan føre til hårtap, [2] i nokre høve også hovudverk. [3] Innhaldsliste 1 Hestehale på kvinner 2 Hestehale på menn 3 Galleri 4 Sjå òg 5 Bakgrunnsstoff 6 Kjelder Hestehale på kvinner | Ungjente med hestehale som held håret unna ansiktet...
            Read more