What is ls Largest Number Formed by only moving two sticks in 508? Announcing the arrival of...
France's Public Holidays' Puzzle
Can a multiclassed druid/rogue benefit from Expertise while in Wild Shape?
Not within Jobscope - Aggravated injury
What is ls Largest Number Formed by only moving two sticks in 508?
Is there an efficient way for synchronising audio events real-time with LEDs using an MCU?
What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?
Lazy Loading a Bioinformatic SAM record
Did war bonds have better investment alternatives during WWII?
Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
Show two Lagrangians are equivalent
Calculating the expected value of truncated normal
Was Objective-C really a hinderance to Apple software development?
How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?
What is a 'Key' in computer science?
Is there a verb for listening stealthily?
Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?
What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?
SQL Server placement of master database files vs resource database files
Coin Game with infinite paradox
/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls
Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers
Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
What is ls Largest Number Formed by only moving two sticks in 508?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Largest number with five 1's and five numeric operations90s Number PuzzleWhat is the largest number you can create with 0000 by moving only two sticks?Make numbers 1 - 32 using the digits 2, 0, 1, 7Yet another matchstick puzzleMathematical riddleMake numbers 1 - 30 using the digits 2, 0, 1, 8Four points with only two distancesCreate Numbers 1 - 100 using 1,9,6,8Find 108 by using 3,4,6
$begingroup$

Tilting the Image is not allowed.
You can cannot change order of digits.
You cannot change the Size if Digits unless you are harry potter.
You can increase or decrease space between digits though.
Hint:Think different
mathematics matches
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$

Tilting the Image is not allowed.
You can cannot change order of digits.
You cannot change the Size if Digits unless you are harry potter.
You can increase or decrease space between digits though.
Hint:Think different
mathematics matches
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$

Tilting the Image is not allowed.
You can cannot change order of digits.
You cannot change the Size if Digits unless you are harry potter.
You can increase or decrease space between digits though.
Hint:Think different
mathematics matches
$endgroup$

Tilting the Image is not allowed.
You can cannot change order of digits.
You cannot change the Size if Digits unless you are harry potter.
You can increase or decrease space between digits though.
Hint:Think different
mathematics matches
mathematics matches
edited 31 mins ago
AmanSharma
asked 53 mins ago
AmanSharmaAmanSharma
1314
1314
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...
I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:
15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wisest answer:
$5118^{11}$
By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p
Debatable, allowing different sizes:
$11^{5118}$
Allowing that digits can have different sizes
Extremely debatable solution:
$5118! ge 5^{16762}$
by cutting sticks
This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...
$56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without going too far out of the box:
15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front
Actually, that should be:
51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.
6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.
So far out of the box it's probably illegal.
g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
@AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,
938
You can do this by
Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82110%2fwhat-is-ls-largest-number-formed-by-only-moving-two-sticks-in-508%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...
I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:
15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...
I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:
15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...
I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:
15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...
$endgroup$
Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...
I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:
15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...
answered 24 mins ago
Dr tDr t
1,228313
1,228313
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wisest answer:
$5118^{11}$
By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p
Debatable, allowing different sizes:
$11^{5118}$
Allowing that digits can have different sizes
Extremely debatable solution:
$5118! ge 5^{16762}$
by cutting sticks
This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...
$56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wisest answer:
$5118^{11}$
By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p
Debatable, allowing different sizes:
$11^{5118}$
Allowing that digits can have different sizes
Extremely debatable solution:
$5118! ge 5^{16762}$
by cutting sticks
This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...
$56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wisest answer:
$5118^{11}$
By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p
Debatable, allowing different sizes:
$11^{5118}$
Allowing that digits can have different sizes
Extremely debatable solution:
$5118! ge 5^{16762}$
by cutting sticks
This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...
$56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...
$endgroup$
Wisest answer:
$5118^{11}$
By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p
Debatable, allowing different sizes:
$11^{5118}$
Allowing that digits can have different sizes
Extremely debatable solution:
$5118! ge 5^{16762}$
by cutting sticks
This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...
$56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...
edited 34 mins ago
answered 48 mins ago
J.KhamphousoneJ.Khamphousone
1756
1756
1
$begingroup$
That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
33 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
33 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without going too far out of the box:
15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front
Actually, that should be:
51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without going too far out of the box:
15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front
Actually, that should be:
51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without going too far out of the box:
15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front
Actually, that should be:
51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.
$endgroup$
Without going too far out of the box:
15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front
Actually, that should be:
51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.
edited 10 mins ago
answered 24 mins ago
PugmonkeyPugmonkey
3,5701220
3,5701220
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.
6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.
So far out of the box it's probably illegal.
g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
@AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.
6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.
So far out of the box it's probably illegal.
g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
@AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.
6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.
So far out of the box it's probably illegal.
g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.
$endgroup$
Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.
6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.
So far out of the box it's probably illegal.
g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.
edited 7 mins ago
answered 18 mins ago
SconibulusSconibulus
14.7k128101
14.7k128101
$begingroup$
Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
@AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
@AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
$endgroup$
– AmanSharma
15 mins ago
$begingroup$
@AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
@AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,
938
You can do this by
Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,
938
You can do this by
Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,
938
You can do this by
Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.
$endgroup$
Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,
938
You can do this by
Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.
answered 17 mins ago
SensoraySensoray
4,54311246
4,54311246
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82110%2fwhat-is-ls-largest-number-formed-by-only-moving-two-sticks-in-508%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown