What is ls Largest Number Formed by only moving two sticks in 508? Announcing the arrival of...

France's Public Holidays' Puzzle

Can a multiclassed druid/rogue benefit from Expertise while in Wild Shape?

Not within Jobscope - Aggravated injury

What is ls Largest Number Formed by only moving two sticks in 508?

Is there an efficient way for synchronising audio events real-time with LEDs using an MCU?

What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?

Lazy Loading a Bioinformatic SAM record

Did war bonds have better investment alternatives during WWII?

Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Show two Lagrangians are equivalent

Calculating the expected value of truncated normal

Was Objective-C really a hinderance to Apple software development?

How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?

What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?

SQL Server placement of master database files vs resource database files

Coin Game with infinite paradox

/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls

Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management



What is ls Largest Number Formed by only moving two sticks in 508?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Largest number with five 1's and five numeric operations90s Number PuzzleWhat is the largest number you can create with 0000 by moving only two sticks?Make numbers 1 - 32 using the digits 2, 0, 1, 7Yet another matchstick puzzleMathematical riddleMake numbers 1 - 30 using the digits 2, 0, 1, 8Four points with only two distancesCreate Numbers 1 - 100 using 1,9,6,8Find 108 by using 3,4,6












2












$begingroup$


The Math Game



Tilting the Image is not allowed.
You can cannot change order of digits.
You cannot change the Size if Digits unless you are harry potter.
You can increase or decrease space between digits though.



Hint:Think different










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    The Math Game



    Tilting the Image is not allowed.
    You can cannot change order of digits.
    You cannot change the Size if Digits unless you are harry potter.
    You can increase or decrease space between digits though.



    Hint:Think different










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      The Math Game



      Tilting the Image is not allowed.
      You can cannot change order of digits.
      You cannot change the Size if Digits unless you are harry potter.
      You can increase or decrease space between digits though.



      Hint:Think different










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The Math Game



      Tilting the Image is not allowed.
      You can cannot change order of digits.
      You cannot change the Size if Digits unless you are harry potter.
      You can increase or decrease space between digits though.



      Hint:Think different







      mathematics matches






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 31 mins ago







      AmanSharma

















      asked 53 mins ago









      AmanSharmaAmanSharma

      1314




      1314






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...



          I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:




          15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Wisest answer:




          $5118^{11}$
          By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p




          Debatable, allowing different sizes:




          $11^{5118}$
          Allowing that digits can have different sizes




          Extremely debatable solution:




          $5118! ge 5^{16762}$
          by cutting sticks




          This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...




          $56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            33 mins ago





















          1












          $begingroup$

          Without going too far out of the box:




          15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front




          Actually, that should be:




          51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.




          6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.




          So far out of the box it's probably illegal.




          g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
            $endgroup$
            – Sconibulus
            6 mins ago



















          0












          $begingroup$

          Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,




          938




          You can do this by




          Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "559"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82110%2fwhat-is-ls-largest-number-formed-by-only-moving-two-sticks-in-508%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes








            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...



            I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:




            15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...



            I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:




            15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...



            I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:




            15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Without taking too many liberties with the possibilities when it comes to rules...



            I would say that the largest number made by moving only two sticks and without invoking any sort of exponents is:




            15118 created by moving the top sticks from the zero to make a one in front of the 5...








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 24 mins ago









            Dr tDr t

            1,228313




            1,228313












            • $begingroup$
              Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            Wisest answer:




            $5118^{11}$
            By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p




            Debatable, allowing different sizes:




            $11^{5118}$
            Allowing that digits can have different sizes




            Extremely debatable solution:




            $5118! ge 5^{16762}$
            by cutting sticks




            This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...




            $56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              33 mins ago


















            1












            $begingroup$

            Wisest answer:




            $5118^{11}$
            By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p




            Debatable, allowing different sizes:




            $11^{5118}$
            Allowing that digits can have different sizes




            Extremely debatable solution:




            $5118! ge 5^{16762}$
            by cutting sticks




            This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...




            $56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              33 mins ago
















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Wisest answer:




            $5118^{11}$
            By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p




            Debatable, allowing different sizes:




            $11^{5118}$
            Allowing that digits can have different sizes




            Extremely debatable solution:




            $5118! ge 5^{16762}$
            by cutting sticks




            This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...




            $56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Wisest answer:




            $5118^{11}$
            By removing the two sticks of the zero and placing them on exponent :p




            Debatable, allowing different sizes:




            $11^{5118}$
            Allowing that digits can have different sizes




            Extremely debatable solution:




            $5118! ge 5^{16762}$
            by cutting sticks




            This solution could be acceptable for mathematicians' haters...




            $56/0 longrightarrow +infty$, yes, the divide symbol is smaller than digits...








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 34 mins ago

























            answered 48 mins ago









            J.KhamphousoneJ.Khamphousone

            1756




            1756








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              33 mins ago
















            • 1




              $begingroup$
              That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              33 mins ago










            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            33 mins ago






            $begingroup$
            That was out of universe . We are not changing size of digits here Bro. Also infinity isn't a number.
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            33 mins ago













            1












            $begingroup$

            Without going too far out of the box:




            15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front




            Actually, that should be:




            51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Without going too far out of the box:




            15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front




            Actually, that should be:




            51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Without going too far out of the box:




            15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front




            Actually, that should be:




            51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Without going too far out of the box:




            15118 by removing the top and bottom matches from the 0 (creating 2 ones) and using them to create a one at the front




            Actually, that should be:




            51181 using the same method but putting the new digit at the end.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 10 mins ago

























            answered 24 mins ago









            PugmonkeyPugmonkey

            3,5701220




            3,5701220












            • $begingroup$
              Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.




            6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.




            So far out of the box it's probably illegal.




            g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago












            • $begingroup$
              @AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
              $endgroup$
              – Sconibulus
              6 mins ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.




            6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.




            So far out of the box it's probably illegal.




            g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago












            • $begingroup$
              @AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
              $endgroup$
              – Sconibulus
              6 mins ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.




            6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.




            So far out of the box it's probably illegal.




            g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Slightly out of the box, but probably legal.




            6E8, moving the two right sticks of the 0. 9E8 might be possible, but I don't think that's the accepted way of making a digital 9.




            So far out of the box it's probably illegal.




            g98 in Graham's Notation, where Graham's Number is g64.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 7 mins ago

























            answered 18 mins ago









            SconibulusSconibulus

            14.7k128101




            14.7k128101












            • $begingroup$
              Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago












            • $begingroup$
              @AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
              $endgroup$
              – Sconibulus
              6 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
              $endgroup$
              – AmanSharma
              15 mins ago












            • $begingroup$
              @AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
              $endgroup$
              – Sconibulus
              6 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago






            $begingroup$
            Legal But Still Bro You are long long long long .... way behind the largest Number
            $endgroup$
            – AmanSharma
            15 mins ago














            $begingroup$
            @AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
            $endgroup$
            – Sconibulus
            6 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @AmanSharma Cheated a bit harder
            $endgroup$
            – Sconibulus
            6 mins ago











            0












            $begingroup$

            Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,




            938




            You can do this by




            Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,




              938




              You can do this by




              Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,




                938




                You can do this by




                Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.







                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Without adding extra digits and keeping with the digital-like format,




                938




                You can do this by




                Removing the two matches on the left side of the zero and turning on horizontal to make the 0 a 3, and the other match to the top right of the 5 to turn it into a 9.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 17 mins ago









                SensoraySensoray

                4,54311246




                4,54311246






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82110%2fwhat-is-ls-largest-number-formed-by-only-moving-two-sticks-in-508%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

                    Nässjö kommun Tettstader | Kjelder | NavigasjonsmenyeVIAFISNIGeoNamesMusicBrainz (area)

                    Kvitkval Innhaldsliste Taksonomi og utvikling | Utsjånad og levevis | Utbreiing | Åtferd |...