Are these square matrices always diagonalisable? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate...
Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?
Specify the range of GridLines
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Test if all elements of a Foldable are the same
Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?
How did Elite on the NES work?
Why is water being consumed when my shutoff valve is closed?
Writing a T-SQL stored procedure to receive 4 numbers and insert them into a table
Will I lose my paid in full property
Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class?
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
Why is arima in R one time step off?
What does the black goddess statue do and what is it?
Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers
Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?
Putting Ant-Man on house arrest
What's parked in Mil Moscow helicopter plant?
Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?
How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?
Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?
Does a Draconic Bloodline sorcerer's doubled proficiency bonus for Charisma checks against dragons apply to all dragon types or only the chosen one?
Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?
What to do with someone that cheated their way though university and a PhD program?
What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?
Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)Conditions for diagonalizability of $ntimes n$ anti-diagonal matricesFinding eigenvalues/vectors of a matrix and proving it is not diagonalisable.Finding if a linear transformation is diagonalisableThe diagonalisation of the two matricesIf $A in K^{n times n}$ is diagonalisable, the dimension of the subspace of its commuting matrices is $geq n$ nCalculating the eigenvalues of a diagonalisable linear operator $L$.How to find eigenvalues for mod 2 field?Find for which real parameter a matrix is diagonalisableSquare Roots of a Matrix: Diagonalisable Solutions.eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Diagonalisable matrices
$begingroup$
When trying to solve a physics problem on decoupling a system of ODEs, I found myself needing to address the following problem:
Let $A_nin M_n(mathbb R)$ be the matrix with all $1$s above its main diagonal, all $-1$s below its diagonal, and $0$s everywhere else. Is $A_n$ always diagonalisable? If so, what is its diagonalisation (equivalently: what are its eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors)?
For example,
$$A_3=begin{bmatrix}0&1&0\-1&0&1\0&-1&0end{bmatrix},quad A_5begin{bmatrix}0&1&0&0&0\-1&0&1&0&0\0&-1&0&1&0\0&0&-1&0&1\0&0&0&-1&0end{bmatrix}.$$
Assuming my code is correct, Mathematica has been able to verify that $A_n$ is always diagonalisable up to $n=1000$. If we use $chi_n(t)inmathbb Z[t]$ to denote the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$, a straightforward evaluation also shows that
$$chi_n(t)=-tchi_{n-1}(t)+chi_{n-2}(t)tag{1}$$
for all $ngeq4$. Furthermore, note that $A_n=-A_n^t$ so that, in the case where the dimension is even,
$$det(A_{2n}-lambda I)=det(A_{2n}^t-lambda I)=det(-A_{2n}-lambda I)=det(A_{2n}+lambda I).$$
This implies that whenever $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A_{2n}$, so is $-lambda$. In other words, $chi_{2n}(t)$ is always of the form $(t^2-lambda _1^2)(t^2-lambda_2^2)dotsm(t^2-lambda_n^2)$ for some $lambda_i$.
And this is where I am stuck. In order for $A_n$ to be diagonalisable, we must have that all the eigenvalues are distinct, but trying to use the recurrence $(1)$ and strong induction, or trying to use the formula for the even case have not helped at all. It seems like the most probable line of attack would be to somehow show that
$$chi_{2n}'(t)=2tsum_{k=1}^nfrac{chi_{2n}(t)}{t^2-lambda_k^2}$$
never shares a common zero with $chi_{2n}$ (which would resolve the even case), though I don't see how to make this work.
Note: I do not have any clue how to actually find the eigenvalues/eigenvectors even in the case where the $A_n$ are diagonalisable. As such even if someone cannot answer the second part of the question, but can prove that the $A_n$ are diagonalisable, I would appreciate that as an answer as well. Above I tried to look at the special case where the dimension is even, though of course the proof for all odd and even $n$ is more valuable. Even if this is not possible, for my purposes I just need an unbounded subset $Ssubseteqmathbb Z$ for which the conclusion is proven for $nin S$, so any such approach is welcome too.
Thank you in advance!
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors determinant diagonalization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When trying to solve a physics problem on decoupling a system of ODEs, I found myself needing to address the following problem:
Let $A_nin M_n(mathbb R)$ be the matrix with all $1$s above its main diagonal, all $-1$s below its diagonal, and $0$s everywhere else. Is $A_n$ always diagonalisable? If so, what is its diagonalisation (equivalently: what are its eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors)?
For example,
$$A_3=begin{bmatrix}0&1&0\-1&0&1\0&-1&0end{bmatrix},quad A_5begin{bmatrix}0&1&0&0&0\-1&0&1&0&0\0&-1&0&1&0\0&0&-1&0&1\0&0&0&-1&0end{bmatrix}.$$
Assuming my code is correct, Mathematica has been able to verify that $A_n$ is always diagonalisable up to $n=1000$. If we use $chi_n(t)inmathbb Z[t]$ to denote the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$, a straightforward evaluation also shows that
$$chi_n(t)=-tchi_{n-1}(t)+chi_{n-2}(t)tag{1}$$
for all $ngeq4$. Furthermore, note that $A_n=-A_n^t$ so that, in the case where the dimension is even,
$$det(A_{2n}-lambda I)=det(A_{2n}^t-lambda I)=det(-A_{2n}-lambda I)=det(A_{2n}+lambda I).$$
This implies that whenever $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A_{2n}$, so is $-lambda$. In other words, $chi_{2n}(t)$ is always of the form $(t^2-lambda _1^2)(t^2-lambda_2^2)dotsm(t^2-lambda_n^2)$ for some $lambda_i$.
And this is where I am stuck. In order for $A_n$ to be diagonalisable, we must have that all the eigenvalues are distinct, but trying to use the recurrence $(1)$ and strong induction, or trying to use the formula for the even case have not helped at all. It seems like the most probable line of attack would be to somehow show that
$$chi_{2n}'(t)=2tsum_{k=1}^nfrac{chi_{2n}(t)}{t^2-lambda_k^2}$$
never shares a common zero with $chi_{2n}$ (which would resolve the even case), though I don't see how to make this work.
Note: I do not have any clue how to actually find the eigenvalues/eigenvectors even in the case where the $A_n$ are diagonalisable. As such even if someone cannot answer the second part of the question, but can prove that the $A_n$ are diagonalisable, I would appreciate that as an answer as well. Above I tried to look at the special case where the dimension is even, though of course the proof for all odd and even $n$ is more valuable. Even if this is not possible, for my purposes I just need an unbounded subset $Ssubseteqmathbb Z$ for which the conclusion is proven for $nin S$, so any such approach is welcome too.
Thank you in advance!
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors determinant diagonalization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When trying to solve a physics problem on decoupling a system of ODEs, I found myself needing to address the following problem:
Let $A_nin M_n(mathbb R)$ be the matrix with all $1$s above its main diagonal, all $-1$s below its diagonal, and $0$s everywhere else. Is $A_n$ always diagonalisable? If so, what is its diagonalisation (equivalently: what are its eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors)?
For example,
$$A_3=begin{bmatrix}0&1&0\-1&0&1\0&-1&0end{bmatrix},quad A_5begin{bmatrix}0&1&0&0&0\-1&0&1&0&0\0&-1&0&1&0\0&0&-1&0&1\0&0&0&-1&0end{bmatrix}.$$
Assuming my code is correct, Mathematica has been able to verify that $A_n$ is always diagonalisable up to $n=1000$. If we use $chi_n(t)inmathbb Z[t]$ to denote the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$, a straightforward evaluation also shows that
$$chi_n(t)=-tchi_{n-1}(t)+chi_{n-2}(t)tag{1}$$
for all $ngeq4$. Furthermore, note that $A_n=-A_n^t$ so that, in the case where the dimension is even,
$$det(A_{2n}-lambda I)=det(A_{2n}^t-lambda I)=det(-A_{2n}-lambda I)=det(A_{2n}+lambda I).$$
This implies that whenever $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A_{2n}$, so is $-lambda$. In other words, $chi_{2n}(t)$ is always of the form $(t^2-lambda _1^2)(t^2-lambda_2^2)dotsm(t^2-lambda_n^2)$ for some $lambda_i$.
And this is where I am stuck. In order for $A_n$ to be diagonalisable, we must have that all the eigenvalues are distinct, but trying to use the recurrence $(1)$ and strong induction, or trying to use the formula for the even case have not helped at all. It seems like the most probable line of attack would be to somehow show that
$$chi_{2n}'(t)=2tsum_{k=1}^nfrac{chi_{2n}(t)}{t^2-lambda_k^2}$$
never shares a common zero with $chi_{2n}$ (which would resolve the even case), though I don't see how to make this work.
Note: I do not have any clue how to actually find the eigenvalues/eigenvectors even in the case where the $A_n$ are diagonalisable. As such even if someone cannot answer the second part of the question, but can prove that the $A_n$ are diagonalisable, I would appreciate that as an answer as well. Above I tried to look at the special case where the dimension is even, though of course the proof for all odd and even $n$ is more valuable. Even if this is not possible, for my purposes I just need an unbounded subset $Ssubseteqmathbb Z$ for which the conclusion is proven for $nin S$, so any such approach is welcome too.
Thank you in advance!
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors determinant diagonalization
$endgroup$
When trying to solve a physics problem on decoupling a system of ODEs, I found myself needing to address the following problem:
Let $A_nin M_n(mathbb R)$ be the matrix with all $1$s above its main diagonal, all $-1$s below its diagonal, and $0$s everywhere else. Is $A_n$ always diagonalisable? If so, what is its diagonalisation (equivalently: what are its eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors)?
For example,
$$A_3=begin{bmatrix}0&1&0\-1&0&1\0&-1&0end{bmatrix},quad A_5begin{bmatrix}0&1&0&0&0\-1&0&1&0&0\0&-1&0&1&0\0&0&-1&0&1\0&0&0&-1&0end{bmatrix}.$$
Assuming my code is correct, Mathematica has been able to verify that $A_n$ is always diagonalisable up to $n=1000$. If we use $chi_n(t)inmathbb Z[t]$ to denote the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$, a straightforward evaluation also shows that
$$chi_n(t)=-tchi_{n-1}(t)+chi_{n-2}(t)tag{1}$$
for all $ngeq4$. Furthermore, note that $A_n=-A_n^t$ so that, in the case where the dimension is even,
$$det(A_{2n}-lambda I)=det(A_{2n}^t-lambda I)=det(-A_{2n}-lambda I)=det(A_{2n}+lambda I).$$
This implies that whenever $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A_{2n}$, so is $-lambda$. In other words, $chi_{2n}(t)$ is always of the form $(t^2-lambda _1^2)(t^2-lambda_2^2)dotsm(t^2-lambda_n^2)$ for some $lambda_i$.
And this is where I am stuck. In order for $A_n$ to be diagonalisable, we must have that all the eigenvalues are distinct, but trying to use the recurrence $(1)$ and strong induction, or trying to use the formula for the even case have not helped at all. It seems like the most probable line of attack would be to somehow show that
$$chi_{2n}'(t)=2tsum_{k=1}^nfrac{chi_{2n}(t)}{t^2-lambda_k^2}$$
never shares a common zero with $chi_{2n}$ (which would resolve the even case), though I don't see how to make this work.
Note: I do not have any clue how to actually find the eigenvalues/eigenvectors even in the case where the $A_n$ are diagonalisable. As such even if someone cannot answer the second part of the question, but can prove that the $A_n$ are diagonalisable, I would appreciate that as an answer as well. Above I tried to look at the special case where the dimension is even, though of course the proof for all odd and even $n$ is more valuable. Even if this is not possible, for my purposes I just need an unbounded subset $Ssubseteqmathbb Z$ for which the conclusion is proven for $nin S$, so any such approach is welcome too.
Thank you in advance!
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors determinant diagonalization
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors determinant diagonalization
asked 56 mins ago
YiFanYiFan
5,6152829
5,6152829
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrac{kpi}{n+1}right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfrac{mkpi}{n+1}right).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
32 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3198918%2fare-these-square-matrices-always-diagonalisable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrac{kpi}{n+1}right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfrac{mkpi}{n+1}right).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrac{kpi}{n+1}right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfrac{mkpi}{n+1}right).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrac{kpi}{n+1}right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfrac{mkpi}{n+1}right).$$
$endgroup$
The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrac{kpi}{n+1}right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfrac{mkpi}{n+1}right).$$
edited 41 mins ago
answered 47 mins ago
JimmyK4542JimmyK4542
41.5k246108
41.5k246108
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
32 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
32 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.
$endgroup$
All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.
answered 44 mins ago
José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
177k24138250
177k24138250
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
32 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
32 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 42 mins ago
gcousingcousin
1012
1012
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
33 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3198918%2fare-these-square-matrices-always-diagonalisable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown