“ne paelici suspectaretur” (Tacitus)Quality of final ĕ ĭ ŏ
How to set the font color of quantity objects (Version 11.3 vs version 12)?
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Subtleties of choosing the sequence of tenses in Russian
Were there two appearances of Stan Lee?
Why is the origin of “threshold” uncertain?
Was it really necessary for the Lunar Module to have 2 stages?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
Why does Bran Stark feel that Jon Snow "needs to know" about his lineage?
What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `a{b,c}d` (braces)?
Confused by notation of atomic number Z and mass number A on periodic table of elements
A question regarding using the definite article
What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?
Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?
Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics
Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?
Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears?
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
Does the EU Common Fisheries Policy cover British Overseas Territories?
Where did the extra Pym particles come from in Endgame?
Is creating your own "experiment" considered cheating during a physics exam?
Lock in SQL Server and Oracle
Past Perfect Tense
Python "triplet" dictionary?
Reversing the direction of the arrow in gb4e
“ne paelici suspectaretur” (Tacitus)
Quality of final ĕ ĭ ŏ
Tacitus, Annales 4.3:
pellit domo Seianus uxorem Apicatam, ex qua tres liberos genuerat, ne paelici suspectaretur.
The translation on Perseus (Church and Brodribb) gives:
Sejanus, to avert his mistress's jealousy, divorced his wife Apicata, by whom he had had three children.
How does ne paelici suspectaretur mean to avert his mistress's jealousy?
Ne suspectaretur is easy: "lest he should be suspected". Paelici is a dative of paelex "mistress". But I'm not seeing what a dative could be doing in this clause.
Apparently, too, there's an alternate reading of this phrase: L&S under suspecto quote this as ne pellici suspectaretur, with a passive infinitive of pellicio "allure, entice". It would then mean "lest he be suspected of being enticed". This at least works grammatically, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean.
What's going on with this phrase?
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
add a comment |
Tacitus, Annales 4.3:
pellit domo Seianus uxorem Apicatam, ex qua tres liberos genuerat, ne paelici suspectaretur.
The translation on Perseus (Church and Brodribb) gives:
Sejanus, to avert his mistress's jealousy, divorced his wife Apicata, by whom he had had three children.
How does ne paelici suspectaretur mean to avert his mistress's jealousy?
Ne suspectaretur is easy: "lest he should be suspected". Paelici is a dative of paelex "mistress". But I'm not seeing what a dative could be doing in this clause.
Apparently, too, there's an alternate reading of this phrase: L&S under suspecto quote this as ne pellici suspectaretur, with a passive infinitive of pellicio "allure, entice". It would then mean "lest he be suspected of being enticed". This at least works grammatically, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean.
What's going on with this phrase?
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
add a comment |
Tacitus, Annales 4.3:
pellit domo Seianus uxorem Apicatam, ex qua tres liberos genuerat, ne paelici suspectaretur.
The translation on Perseus (Church and Brodribb) gives:
Sejanus, to avert his mistress's jealousy, divorced his wife Apicata, by whom he had had three children.
How does ne paelici suspectaretur mean to avert his mistress's jealousy?
Ne suspectaretur is easy: "lest he should be suspected". Paelici is a dative of paelex "mistress". But I'm not seeing what a dative could be doing in this clause.
Apparently, too, there's an alternate reading of this phrase: L&S under suspecto quote this as ne pellici suspectaretur, with a passive infinitive of pellicio "allure, entice". It would then mean "lest he be suspected of being enticed". This at least works grammatically, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean.
What's going on with this phrase?
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
Tacitus, Annales 4.3:
pellit domo Seianus uxorem Apicatam, ex qua tres liberos genuerat, ne paelici suspectaretur.
The translation on Perseus (Church and Brodribb) gives:
Sejanus, to avert his mistress's jealousy, divorced his wife Apicata, by whom he had had three children.
How does ne paelici suspectaretur mean to avert his mistress's jealousy?
Ne suspectaretur is easy: "lest he should be suspected". Paelici is a dative of paelex "mistress". But I'm not seeing what a dative could be doing in this clause.
Apparently, too, there's an alternate reading of this phrase: L&S under suspecto quote this as ne pellici suspectaretur, with a passive infinitive of pellicio "allure, entice". It would then mean "lest he be suspected of being enticed". This at least works grammatically, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean.
What's going on with this phrase?
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
12.1k23476
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
14.6k3259
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f10584%2fne-paelici-suspectaretur-tacitus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
add a comment |
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
add a comment |
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
edited 3 mins ago
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
12.1k23476
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f10584%2fne-paelici-suspectaretur-tacitus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
