How does a Swashbuckler rogue “fight with two weapons while safely darting away”?What does Assassinate...

How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?

What is a Recurrent Neural Network?

Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics

Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?

Upright [...] in italics quotation

Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?

Why do Ichisongas hate elephants and hippos?

TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes?

How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?

Is it possible to measure lightning discharges as Nikola Tesla?

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?

Python "triplet" dictionary?

Single Colour Mastermind Problem

What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?

What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `a{b,c}d` (braces)?

Help, my Death Star suffers from Kessler syndrome!

Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?

A non-technological, repeating, visible object in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hours

Can not tell colimits from limits

Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?

How to set the font color of quantity objects (Version 11.3 vs version 12)?

How to delegate to implementing class

What does YCWCYODFTRFDTY mean?

Were there two appearances of Stan Lee?



How does a Swashbuckler rogue “fight with two weapons while safely darting away”?


What does Assassinate mean by “surprised”, and can it be used multiple times?Does uncanny dodge prevent ranged sneak attacks?Optimal martial ranged non-human level 15 build for DPR/SurvivalMelee with AOE-impacted enemyHow can I make Westley from The Princess Bride in D&D 5e?Does a wizard really have the same chance to hit as a fighter?Should the Swashbuckler Fancy Footwork ability apply to my Crossbow Master rogue in melee range?Is allowing PCs to take a “zeroth level” in a class seriously unbalanced or not?How to build a rogue unchained to be able to fight with 2 blade boots and 2 daggers?How can I have a shield and a way of attacking at distance at the same time?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







4












$begingroup$


The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:




A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.




How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    5 hours ago


















4












$begingroup$


The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:




A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.




How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    5 hours ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$


The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:




A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.




How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:




A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.




How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.







dnd-5e rogue archetype






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 34 mins ago









V2Blast

28.1k5101171




28.1k5101171










asked 6 hours ago









JackJack

10.5k44198




10.5k44198












  • $begingroup$
    Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    5 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    5 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

The next paragraph reads




When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
    $endgroup$
    – Carcer
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
    $endgroup$
    – Seidr
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
    $endgroup$
    – Carcer
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    2 hours ago



















7












$begingroup$

This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-rogue-fight-with-two-weapons-while-safely-darting-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12












    $begingroup$

    The next paragraph reads




    When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
    how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
    During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
    creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
    against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




    It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




    This allows you to use your bonus action to
    fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
    you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




    So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
      $endgroup$
      – Carcer
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
      $endgroup$
      – Seidr
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      5 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
      $endgroup$
      – Carcer
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      2 hours ago
















    12












    $begingroup$

    The next paragraph reads




    When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
    how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
    During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
    creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
    against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




    It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




    This allows you to use your bonus action to
    fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
    you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




    So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
      $endgroup$
      – Carcer
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
      $endgroup$
      – Seidr
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      5 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
      $endgroup$
      – Carcer
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      2 hours ago














    12












    12








    12





    $begingroup$

    The next paragraph reads




    When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
    how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
    During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
    creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
    against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




    It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




    This allows you to use your bonus action to
    fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
    you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




    So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$



    The next paragraph reads




    When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
    how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
    During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
    creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
    against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




    It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




    This allows you to use your bonus action to
    fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
    you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




    So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 6 hours ago









    SeidrSeidr

    23311




    23311




    New contributor




    Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
      $endgroup$
      – Carcer
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
      $endgroup$
      – Seidr
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      5 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
      $endgroup$
      – Carcer
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      2 hours ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
      $endgroup$
      – Carcer
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
      $endgroup$
      – Seidr
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      5 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
      $endgroup$
      – Carcer
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      2 hours ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
    $endgroup$
    – Carcer
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
    $endgroup$
    – Carcer
    6 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
    $endgroup$
    – Seidr
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
    $endgroup$
    – Seidr
    6 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    5 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
    $endgroup$
    – Carcer
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
    $endgroup$
    – Carcer
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    2 hours ago













    7












    $begingroup$

    This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




    When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
    creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




    A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      7












      $begingroup$

      This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




      When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
      creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




      A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




        When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
        creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




        A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




        When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
        creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




        A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        CarcerCarcer

        27.5k583145




        27.5k583145






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-rogue-fight-with-two-weapons-while-safely-darting-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

            Hestehale Innhaldsliste Hestehale på kvinner | Hestehale på menn | Galleri | Sjå òg |...

            What is the “three and three hundred thousand syndrome”?Who wrote the book Arena?What five creatures were...