How does a Swashbuckler rogue “fight with two weapons while safely darting away”?What does Assassinate...
How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?
What is a Recurrent Neural Network?
Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics
Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?
Upright [...] in italics quotation
Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?
Why do Ichisongas hate elephants and hippos?
TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes?
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
Is it possible to measure lightning discharges as Nikola Tesla?
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
Python "triplet" dictionary?
Single Colour Mastermind Problem
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `a{b,c}d` (braces)?
Help, my Death Star suffers from Kessler syndrome!
Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?
A non-technological, repeating, visible object in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hours
Can not tell colimits from limits
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
How to set the font color of quantity objects (Version 11.3 vs version 12)?
How to delegate to implementing class
What does YCWCYODFTRFDTY mean?
Were there two appearances of Stan Lee?
How does a Swashbuckler rogue “fight with two weapons while safely darting away”?
What does Assassinate mean by “surprised”, and can it be used multiple times?Does uncanny dodge prevent ranged sneak attacks?Optimal martial ranged non-human level 15 build for DPR/SurvivalMelee with AOE-impacted enemyHow can I make Westley from The Princess Bride in D&D 5e?Does a wizard really have the same chance to hit as a fighter?Should the Swashbuckler Fancy Footwork ability apply to my Crossbow Master rogue in melee range?Is allowing PCs to take a “zeroth level” in a class seriously unbalanced or not?How to build a rogue unchained to be able to fight with 2 blade boots and 2 daggers?How can I have a shield and a way of attacking at distance at the same time?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue archetype
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue archetype
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue archetype
$endgroup$
The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue archetype
dnd-5e rogue archetype
edited 34 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
28.1k5101171
asked 6 hours ago
JackJack
10.5k44198
10.5k44198
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-rogue-fight-with-two-weapons-while-safely-darting-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
$endgroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
SeidrSeidr
23311
23311
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
answered 6 hours ago
CarcerCarcer
27.5k583145
27.5k583145
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-rogue-fight-with-two-weapons-while-safely-darting-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
5 hours ago