Finding angle with pure Geometry.perimeter of square inscribed in the triagleTricky pure geometry proofSolid...

Mathematical cryptic clues

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?

To string or not to string

How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?

How to format long polynomial?

The Clique vs. Independent Set Problem

What are the differences between the usage of 'it' and 'they'?

Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation

Schoenfled Residua test shows proportionality hazard assumptions holds but Kaplan-Meier plots intersect

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Today is the Center

Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )

How does strength of boric acid solution increase in presence of salicylic acid?

US citizen flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

Equivalence principle before Einstein

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?



Finding angle with pure Geometry.


perimeter of square inscribed in the triagleTricky pure geometry proofSolid Geometry. Finding an angleGeometry- finding the measure of the angleTwo tangent circles inscribed in a rectangle (Compute the area)Geometry: Finding an angle of a trapezoidFinding angle and radius. Geometry/Trig applicationGeometry (Finding angle $x$)Foundations and Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics, Chapter Problems (1.1.3)Find the two missing angles in a quadrilateral













3












$begingroup$


Each side of a square ABCD has a length of 1 unit. Points P and Q belong to AB and DA respectively. The perimeter of triangle APQ is 2 units. What will be the angle of PCQ.
I was able to do this with simple trignometry and found it to be 45 degrees but the book I am reading doesn't yet talked about trignometry or similarity of triangle so I want rather pure geometric proof which doesn't include trigonometry or similarity of triangle concepts.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
    $endgroup$
    – Dbchatto67
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$


Each side of a square ABCD has a length of 1 unit. Points P and Q belong to AB and DA respectively. The perimeter of triangle APQ is 2 units. What will be the angle of PCQ.
I was able to do this with simple trignometry and found it to be 45 degrees but the book I am reading doesn't yet talked about trignometry or similarity of triangle so I want rather pure geometric proof which doesn't include trigonometry or similarity of triangle concepts.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
    $endgroup$
    – Dbchatto67
    1 hour ago
















3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Each side of a square ABCD has a length of 1 unit. Points P and Q belong to AB and DA respectively. The perimeter of triangle APQ is 2 units. What will be the angle of PCQ.
I was able to do this with simple trignometry and found it to be 45 degrees but the book I am reading doesn't yet talked about trignometry or similarity of triangle so I want rather pure geometric proof which doesn't include trigonometry or similarity of triangle concepts.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Each side of a square ABCD has a length of 1 unit. Points P and Q belong to AB and DA respectively. The perimeter of triangle APQ is 2 units. What will be the angle of PCQ.
I was able to do this with simple trignometry and found it to be 45 degrees but the book I am reading doesn't yet talked about trignometry or similarity of triangle so I want rather pure geometric proof which doesn't include trigonometry or similarity of triangle concepts.







geometry euclidean-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma

1286




1286












  • $begingroup$
    Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
    $endgroup$
    – Dbchatto67
    1 hour ago




















  • $begingroup$
    Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
    $endgroup$
    – Dbchatto67
    1 hour ago


















$begingroup$
Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
1 hour ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

(I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)



Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.



So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.



The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:



$$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$



enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Could you provide a picture?
      $endgroup$
      – Dr. Mathva
      17 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      15 mins ago












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177296%2ffinding-angle-with-pure-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    (I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)



    Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
    Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.



    So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.



    The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:



    $$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$



    enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      (I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)



      Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
      Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.



      So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.



      The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:



      $$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$



      enter image description here






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        (I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)



        Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
        Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.



        So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.



        The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:



        $$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$



        enter image description here






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        (I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)



        Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
        Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.



        So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.



        The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:



        $$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$



        enter image description here







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 45 mins ago









        OldboyOldboy

        9,37911138




        9,37911138























            1












            $begingroup$

            Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Could you provide a picture?
              $endgroup$
              – Dr. Mathva
              17 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              15 mins ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Could you provide a picture?
              $endgroup$
              – Dr. Mathva
              17 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              15 mins ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 22 mins ago

























            answered 30 mins ago









            Maria MazurMaria Mazur

            49.9k1361124




            49.9k1361124












            • $begingroup$
              Could you provide a picture?
              $endgroup$
              – Dr. Mathva
              17 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              15 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Could you provide a picture?
              $endgroup$
              – Dr. Mathva
              17 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              15 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            Could you provide a picture?
            $endgroup$
            – Dr. Mathva
            17 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Could you provide a picture?
            $endgroup$
            – Dr. Mathva
            17 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            @Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
            $endgroup$
            – Maria Mazur
            15 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
            $endgroup$
            – Maria Mazur
            15 mins ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177296%2ffinding-angle-with-pure-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

            Nässjö kommun Tettstader | Kjelder | NavigasjonsmenyeVIAFISNIGeoNamesMusicBrainz (area)

            Kvitkval Innhaldsliste Taksonomi og utvikling | Utsjånad og levevis | Utbreiing | Åtferd |...