Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey...
Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size
How to reverse every other sublist of a list?
Where to refill my bottle in India?
Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?
Polarization lost upon 2nd reflection?
Monty Hall variation
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
Falsification in Math vs Science
Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
What is the best strategy for white in this position?
Patience, young "Padovan"
Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?
In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?
Inline version of a function returns different value then non-inline version
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
How was Skylab's orbit inclination chosen?
How long do I have to send payment?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?
Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions
Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(frac{x+y}{2})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{2}$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function
$begingroup$
I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.
And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.
I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.
And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.
I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.
And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.
I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
$endgroup$
I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.
And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.
I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
537
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
59 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
$endgroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
3,506627
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
$endgroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
3,710926
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
59 mins ago