Why dativ case for the verb widerspricht?Schreibst du einen Brief an deinen Vater?Should one necessarily...
What does it mean when I add a new variable to my linear model and the R^2 stays the same?
Are small insurances worth it
Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?
Professor forcing me to attend a conference
Error in TransformedField
Why is, for a group scheme of finite type, "smooth" (resp. irreducible) equivalent to "geometrically reduced" (resp. geometrically irreducible)?
How to chmod files that have a specific set of permissions
Why aren't there more gauls like Obelix?
How can friction do no work in case of pure rolling?
Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?
Is there a way to find out the age of climbing ropes?
What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?
Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?
Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?
Where do you go through passport control when transiting through another Schengen airport on your way out of the Schengen area?
Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?
The past tense for the quoting particle って
Genitives like "axeos"
I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?
Who is at the mall?
The (Easy) Road to Code
Why doesn't "adolescent" take any articles in "listen to adolescent agonising"?
Forcing Mathematica's Integrate to give more general answers
What is the meaning of option 'by' in TikZ Intersections
Why dativ case for the verb widerspricht?
Schreibst du einen Brief an deinen Vater?Should one necessarily learn, when a verb goes with a dative object and when with accusative one?What are some rules governing the nominal cases in German?“Willst du der Schülerin helfen?” why dative case “der Schülerin” but not “die Schülerin”?Why are the first parts of these sentences not in nominative case?Sign of the Cross – case of “Im Namen”Cases with multiple objectsPerson vs Thing for determining case?General rule/s for finding out whether an object is accusative or dativeWhy is “Tisch” in “Der Apfel liegt auf dem Tisch” in dative instead of accusative case?
Der Vater widerspricht dem Sohn.
Why does "der Sohn" get dative case here? And not the accusative case? To me, the son seems to be the direct object.
grammatical-case
asked 3 hours ago
KwiebesKwiebes
82
New contributor
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Der Vater widerspricht dem Sohn.
Why does "der Sohn" get dative case here? And not the accusative case? To me, the son seems to be the direct object.
grammatical-case
asked 3 hours ago
KwiebesKwiebes
82
New contributor
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Der Vater widerspricht dem Sohn.
Why does "der Sohn" get dative case here? And not the accusative case? To me, the son seems to be the direct object.
grammatical-case
asked 3 hours ago
KwiebesKwiebes
82
New contributor
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Der Vater widerspricht dem Sohn.
Why does "der Sohn" get dative case here? And not the accusative case? To me, the son seems to be the direct object.
grammatical-case
grammatical-case
asked 3 hours ago
KwiebesKwiebes
82
New contributor
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
KwiebesKwiebes
82
New contributor
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
KwiebesKwiebes
82
New contributor
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
KwiebesKwiebes
82
asked 3 hours ago
KwiebesKwiebes
82
82
New contributor
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Kwiebes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, "der Sohn" is the direct object of the sentence - but it's not in the accusative.
This is one of quite some possible examples where "direct object == accusative" is not true and shows you shouldn't assume such a congruence.
Many German verbs that express opposition through "wider-" and "gegen-" prefixes rule the dative.
- widersprechen
- gegenüberstehen
- entgegengehen
- widersetzen
- ...
answered 2 hours ago
tofrotofro
43.5k145131
Another possible fit for this list is antworten.
– Carsten S
1 hour ago
Also helfen, danken, dienen, etc. etc. etc.
– Janka
58 mins ago
add a comment |
German doesn't have the concept of direct and indirect objects. It does have accusative objects, dative objects and even genitive objects.
Wiedersprechen takes a dative object
answered 2 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
3,341626
It's not quite true that German doesn't have the concept of direct/indirect objects - It is simply not useful to derive the case from that concept, because in German it's a semantical concept only, and not necessarily a grammatical one.
– tofro
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "253"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Kwiebes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50026%2fwhy-dativ-case-for-the-verb-widerspricht%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, "der Sohn" is the direct object of the sentence - but it's not in the accusative.
This is one of quite some possible examples where "direct object == accusative" is not true and shows you shouldn't assume such a congruence.
Many German verbs that express opposition through "wider-" and "gegen-" prefixes rule the dative.
- widersprechen
- gegenüberstehen
- entgegengehen
- widersetzen
- ...
answered 2 hours ago
tofrotofro
43.5k145131
Another possible fit for this list is antworten.
– Carsten S
1 hour ago
Also helfen, danken, dienen, etc. etc. etc.
– Janka
58 mins ago
add a comment |
Yes, "der Sohn" is the direct object of the sentence - but it's not in the accusative.
This is one of quite some possible examples where "direct object == accusative" is not true and shows you shouldn't assume such a congruence.
Many German verbs that express opposition through "wider-" and "gegen-" prefixes rule the dative.
- widersprechen
- gegenüberstehen
- entgegengehen
- widersetzen
- ...
answered 2 hours ago
tofrotofro
43.5k145131
Another possible fit for this list is antworten.
– Carsten S
1 hour ago
Also helfen, danken, dienen, etc. etc. etc.
– Janka
58 mins ago
add a comment |
Yes, "der Sohn" is the direct object of the sentence - but it's not in the accusative.
This is one of quite some possible examples where "direct object == accusative" is not true and shows you shouldn't assume such a congruence.
Many German verbs that express opposition through "wider-" and "gegen-" prefixes rule the dative.
- widersprechen
- gegenüberstehen
- entgegengehen
- widersetzen
- ...
answered 2 hours ago
tofrotofro
43.5k145131
Yes, "der Sohn" is the direct object of the sentence - but it's not in the accusative.
This is one of quite some possible examples where "direct object == accusative" is not true and shows you shouldn't assume such a congruence.
Many German verbs that express opposition through "wider-" and "gegen-" prefixes rule the dative.
- widersprechen
- gegenüberstehen
- entgegengehen
- widersetzen
- ...
answered 2 hours ago
tofrotofro
43.5k145131
answered 2 hours ago
tofrotofro
43.5k145131
answered 2 hours ago
tofrotofro
43.5k145131
answered 2 hours ago
tofrotofro
43.5k145131
43.5k145131
Another possible fit for this list is antworten.
– Carsten S
1 hour ago
Also helfen, danken, dienen, etc. etc. etc.
– Janka
58 mins ago
add a comment |
Another possible fit for this list is antworten.
– Carsten S
1 hour ago
Also helfen, danken, dienen, etc. etc. etc.
– Janka
58 mins ago
Another possible fit for this list is antworten.
– Carsten S
1 hour ago
Another possible fit for this list is antworten.
– Carsten S
1 hour ago
Also helfen, danken, dienen, etc. etc. etc.
– Janka
58 mins ago
Also helfen, danken, dienen, etc. etc. etc.
– Janka
58 mins ago
add a comment |
German doesn't have the concept of direct and indirect objects. It does have accusative objects, dative objects and even genitive objects.
Wiedersprechen takes a dative object
answered 2 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
3,341626
It's not quite true that German doesn't have the concept of direct/indirect objects - It is simply not useful to derive the case from that concept, because in German it's a semantical concept only, and not necessarily a grammatical one.
– tofro
1 hour ago
add a comment |
German doesn't have the concept of direct and indirect objects. It does have accusative objects, dative objects and even genitive objects.
Wiedersprechen takes a dative object
answered 2 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
3,341626
It's not quite true that German doesn't have the concept of direct/indirect objects - It is simply not useful to derive the case from that concept, because in German it's a semantical concept only, and not necessarily a grammatical one.
– tofro
1 hour ago
add a comment |
German doesn't have the concept of direct and indirect objects. It does have accusative objects, dative objects and even genitive objects.
Wiedersprechen takes a dative object
answered 2 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
3,341626
German doesn't have the concept of direct and indirect objects. It does have accusative objects, dative objects and even genitive objects.
Wiedersprechen takes a dative object
answered 2 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
3,341626
answered 2 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
3,341626
answered 2 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
3,341626
answered 2 hours ago
PiedPiperPiedPiper
3,341626
3,341626
It's not quite true that German doesn't have the concept of direct/indirect objects - It is simply not useful to derive the case from that concept, because in German it's a semantical concept only, and not necessarily a grammatical one.
– tofro
1 hour ago
add a comment |
It's not quite true that German doesn't have the concept of direct/indirect objects - It is simply not useful to derive the case from that concept, because in German it's a semantical concept only, and not necessarily a grammatical one.
– tofro
1 hour ago
It's not quite true that German doesn't have the concept of direct/indirect objects - It is simply not useful to derive the case from that concept, because in German it's a semantical concept only, and not necessarily a grammatical one.
– tofro
1 hour ago
It's not quite true that German doesn't have the concept of direct/indirect objects - It is simply not useful to derive the case from that concept, because in German it's a semantical concept only, and not necessarily a grammatical one.
– tofro
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Kwiebes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Kwiebes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Kwiebes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Kwiebes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to German Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50026%2fwhy-dativ-case-for-the-verb-widerspricht%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
