Why does Spock recommend this not be spoken of anymore? Announcing the arrival of Valued...
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
Adapting the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) for integers to polynomials
What criticisms of Wittgenstein's philosophy of language have been offered?
How do you write "wild blueberries flavored"?
What was the last profitable war?
Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?
An isoperimetric-type inequality inside a cube
Is there a spell that can create a permanent fire?
Derived column in a data extension
Understanding piped commands in GNU/Linux
"Destructive power" carried by a B-52?
Where did Ptolemy compare the Earth to the distance of fixed stars?
Statistical analysis applied to methods coming out of Machine Learning
How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
Is the time—manner—place ordering of adverbials an oversimplification?
Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5;
In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?
One-one communication
Why did Bronn offer to be Tyrion Lannister's champion in trial by combat?
Twin's vs. Twins'
Any stored/leased 737s that could substitute for grounded MAXs?
Why does Spock recommend this not be spoken of anymore?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Favorite questions and answers from first quarter of 2019
Latest Blog Post: Avengers: Endgame PredictionsWhy didn't Spock die in The Search for Spock?Inconsistencies explained by an alternate timeline, originating from First Contact?Does Spock have a PhD?Why didn't Starfleet go to red alert on this?Did Spock ever mention or allude to his foster sister?Was Spock Starfleet's second mutineer?Why does Kirk order Spock to initialise “Warp factor 1”?How does this object get to Michael Burnham?Why did this character risk his life for the Federation?Why doesn't this character put on their protective suit?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
At the end of ST:DIS 2x14, Spock recommends that
all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again
in order to prevent the experienced series of events from unfolding again.
This left me deeply confused.
I understand that the data
gathered from the Sphere
was instrumental in
Control gaining self-awareness
Thus, the plan was to send
the ship along with the data, which is magically locked to the ship, off into the far future where it is out of reach.
So, what in the world is Spock's recommendation supposed to achieve in-universe?
Given that various methods of time travel are known in the 23rd century, it is conceivable no-one should know the data is on Discovery. But about the rest - surely, Starfleet cannot just deny the existence of the Discovery's crew. And what does the spore drive have to do with it, anyway? As far as I remember, it played a significant role during several events of the Klingon war, which are definitely noted in Starfleet's historical records, but it was completely irrelevant to Control's rise.
star-trek star-trek-discovery
add a comment |
At the end of ST:DIS 2x14, Spock recommends that
all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again
in order to prevent the experienced series of events from unfolding again.
This left me deeply confused.
I understand that the data
gathered from the Sphere
was instrumental in
Control gaining self-awareness
Thus, the plan was to send
the ship along with the data, which is magically locked to the ship, off into the far future where it is out of reach.
So, what in the world is Spock's recommendation supposed to achieve in-universe?
Given that various methods of time travel are known in the 23rd century, it is conceivable no-one should know the data is on Discovery. But about the rest - surely, Starfleet cannot just deny the existence of the Discovery's crew. And what does the spore drive have to do with it, anyway? As far as I remember, it played a significant role during several events of the Klingon war, which are definitely noted in Starfleet's historical records, but it was completely irrelevant to Control's rise.
star-trek star-trek-discovery
1
Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.
– starpilotsix
2 hours ago
@starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…
– Valorum
2 hours ago
2
not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned
– NKCampbell
1 hour ago
add a comment |
At the end of ST:DIS 2x14, Spock recommends that
all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again
in order to prevent the experienced series of events from unfolding again.
This left me deeply confused.
I understand that the data
gathered from the Sphere
was instrumental in
Control gaining self-awareness
Thus, the plan was to send
the ship along with the data, which is magically locked to the ship, off into the far future where it is out of reach.
So, what in the world is Spock's recommendation supposed to achieve in-universe?
Given that various methods of time travel are known in the 23rd century, it is conceivable no-one should know the data is on Discovery. But about the rest - surely, Starfleet cannot just deny the existence of the Discovery's crew. And what does the spore drive have to do with it, anyway? As far as I remember, it played a significant role during several events of the Klingon war, which are definitely noted in Starfleet's historical records, but it was completely irrelevant to Control's rise.
star-trek star-trek-discovery
At the end of ST:DIS 2x14, Spock recommends that
all officers remaining with knowledge of these events must be ordered never to speak of Discovery, its spore drive, or her crew again
in order to prevent the experienced series of events from unfolding again.
This left me deeply confused.
I understand that the data
gathered from the Sphere
was instrumental in
Control gaining self-awareness
Thus, the plan was to send
the ship along with the data, which is magically locked to the ship, off into the far future where it is out of reach.
So, what in the world is Spock's recommendation supposed to achieve in-universe?
Given that various methods of time travel are known in the 23rd century, it is conceivable no-one should know the data is on Discovery. But about the rest - surely, Starfleet cannot just deny the existence of the Discovery's crew. And what does the spore drive have to do with it, anyway? As far as I remember, it played a significant role during several events of the Klingon war, which are definitely noted in Starfleet's historical records, but it was completely irrelevant to Control's rise.
star-trek star-trek-discovery
star-trek star-trek-discovery
edited 7 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
25.7k577144
asked 2 hours ago
O. R. MapperO. R. Mapper
1,69611020
1,69611020
1
Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.
– starpilotsix
2 hours ago
@starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…
– Valorum
2 hours ago
2
not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned
– NKCampbell
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.
– starpilotsix
2 hours ago
@starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…
– Valorum
2 hours ago
2
not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned
– NKCampbell
1 hour ago
1
1
Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.
– starpilotsix
2 hours ago
Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.
– starpilotsix
2 hours ago
@starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…
– Valorum
2 hours ago
@starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…
– Valorum
2 hours ago
2
2
not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned
– NKCampbell
1 hour ago
not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned
– NKCampbell
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)
It prevents people from asking deeper questions
There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask.
If they had notified them of the Sphere data, it would have been presumed lost. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).
It stops the Section 31 time travel program
Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges the leadership of Section 31, the only other people to know outside of Pike's Enterprise) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess, with people trying to steal time crystals and a temporal cold war looming.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209518%2fwhy-does-spock-recommend-this-not-be-spoken-of-anymore%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)
It prevents people from asking deeper questions
There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask.
If they had notified them of the Sphere data, it would have been presumed lost. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).
It stops the Section 31 time travel program
Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges the leadership of Section 31, the only other people to know outside of Pike's Enterprise) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess, with people trying to steal time crystals and a temporal cold war looming.
add a comment |
Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)
It prevents people from asking deeper questions
There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask.
If they had notified them of the Sphere data, it would have been presumed lost. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).
It stops the Section 31 time travel program
Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges the leadership of Section 31, the only other people to know outside of Pike's Enterprise) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess, with people trying to steal time crystals and a temporal cold war looming.
add a comment |
Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)
It prevents people from asking deeper questions
There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask.
If they had notified them of the Sphere data, it would have been presumed lost. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).
It stops the Section 31 time travel program
Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges the leadership of Section 31, the only other people to know outside of Pike's Enterprise) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess, with people trying to steal time crystals and a temporal cold war looming.
Major spoilers ahead (impractical to wrap this all in spoilers)
It prevents people from asking deeper questions
There's no evidence it exploded (hence the intense questioning). We're not told everything they told Starfleet, but let's assume they omitted the Sphere data debacle. Starfleet knew about Control but would be puzzled why Control was so focused on Discovery. Maybe someone would boot Control back up to ask.
If they had notified them of the Sphere data, it would have been presumed lost. By pretending that Discovery was lost, in the absence of other data, Starfleet would stop asking questions (we've seen this elsewhere when convenient lies are used to cover up things).
It stops the Section 31 time travel program
Only Ashe Tyler knows about it now (presumably, since Control purges the leadership of Section 31, the only other people to know outside of Pike's Enterprise) and he knows what's at stake if he chooses to pursue it. It's also safe to assume that this stops the Klingons from pursuing it as well, knowing that it could reawaken a monster. If they said "Oh, Burnham flew her Time Suit and Discovery to the 32nd Century", someone would say "Really? We need one of those" and then you're back in the same mess, with people trying to steal time crystals and a temporal cold war looming.
edited 1 min ago
answered 1 hour ago
MachavityMachavity
25.7k577144
25.7k577144
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209518%2fwhy-does-spock-recommend-this-not-be-spoken-of-anymore%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Bad writing. It answers many questions about Discovery.
– starpilotsix
2 hours ago
@starpilotsix - scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/12432/…
– Valorum
2 hours ago
2
not being snarky - it is a good out of universe reason to reconcile how none of these events were ever mentioned
– NKCampbell
1 hour ago