An isoperimetric-type inequality inside a cube Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at...
An isoperimetric-type inequality inside a cube
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Name for an inequality of isoperimetric typeLevy's isoperimetric inequality for sphereStronger version of the isoperimetric inequalityIsoperimetric-like inequality for non-connected setsHypercube isoperimetric inequality for non-increasing eventsPeculiar vertex-isoperimetric inequality on the discrete torus (and generalization)Isoperimetric inequality via Crofton's formulaAn isoperimetric type of inequality in terms of Wasserstein distance/Optimal transportA cube is placed inside another cubeA question of Ahlswede and Katona: known lower bounds on $beta(d,n)$?
$begingroup$
I am looking for a reference for the following inequality: if $Omega subset [0,1]^d$ satisfies $mbox{vol}(Omega) leq 1/2$, then
$$ mathcal{H}^{d-1}left( partialOmega cap (0,1)^dright) geq c_d mbox{vol}(Omega)^{frac{d-1}{d}},$$
where $mathcal{H}^{d-1}$ is the $(d-1)-$dimensional Hausdorff measure and $c_d > 0$ is a universal constant depending only on $d$.
This is a variation of the classical isoperimetric inequality with the interesting addition that surface 'on the boundary of the cube' does not count. This seems like it should be known. A discrete version of this inequality (for subsets of the grid graph) was proven by Bollobas and Leader (Edge-isoperimetric inequalities in the grid, Combinatorica 1991) and it seems there is a wealth of information for the discrete case. Has anybody seen the continuous case stated somewhere?
reference-request mg.metric-geometry geometric-measure-theory isoperimetric-problems
asked 3 hours ago
Stefan SteinerbergerStefan Steinerberger
233
New contributor
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am looking for a reference for the following inequality: if $Omega subset [0,1]^d$ satisfies $mbox{vol}(Omega) leq 1/2$, then
$$ mathcal{H}^{d-1}left( partialOmega cap (0,1)^dright) geq c_d mbox{vol}(Omega)^{frac{d-1}{d}},$$
where $mathcal{H}^{d-1}$ is the $(d-1)-$dimensional Hausdorff measure and $c_d > 0$ is a universal constant depending only on $d$.
This is a variation of the classical isoperimetric inequality with the interesting addition that surface 'on the boundary of the cube' does not count. This seems like it should be known. A discrete version of this inequality (for subsets of the grid graph) was proven by Bollobas and Leader (Edge-isoperimetric inequalities in the grid, Combinatorica 1991) and it seems there is a wealth of information for the discrete case. Has anybody seen the continuous case stated somewhere?
reference-request mg.metric-geometry geometric-measure-theory isoperimetric-problems
asked 3 hours ago
Stefan SteinerbergerStefan Steinerberger
233
New contributor
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am looking for a reference for the following inequality: if $Omega subset [0,1]^d$ satisfies $mbox{vol}(Omega) leq 1/2$, then
$$ mathcal{H}^{d-1}left( partialOmega cap (0,1)^dright) geq c_d mbox{vol}(Omega)^{frac{d-1}{d}},$$
where $mathcal{H}^{d-1}$ is the $(d-1)-$dimensional Hausdorff measure and $c_d > 0$ is a universal constant depending only on $d$.
This is a variation of the classical isoperimetric inequality with the interesting addition that surface 'on the boundary of the cube' does not count. This seems like it should be known. A discrete version of this inequality (for subsets of the grid graph) was proven by Bollobas and Leader (Edge-isoperimetric inequalities in the grid, Combinatorica 1991) and it seems there is a wealth of information for the discrete case. Has anybody seen the continuous case stated somewhere?
reference-request mg.metric-geometry geometric-measure-theory isoperimetric-problems
asked 3 hours ago
Stefan SteinerbergerStefan Steinerberger
233
New contributor
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I am looking for a reference for the following inequality: if $Omega subset [0,1]^d$ satisfies $mbox{vol}(Omega) leq 1/2$, then
$$ mathcal{H}^{d-1}left( partialOmega cap (0,1)^dright) geq c_d mbox{vol}(Omega)^{frac{d-1}{d}},$$
where $mathcal{H}^{d-1}$ is the $(d-1)-$dimensional Hausdorff measure and $c_d > 0$ is a universal constant depending only on $d$.
This is a variation of the classical isoperimetric inequality with the interesting addition that surface 'on the boundary of the cube' does not count. This seems like it should be known. A discrete version of this inequality (for subsets of the grid graph) was proven by Bollobas and Leader (Edge-isoperimetric inequalities in the grid, Combinatorica 1991) and it seems there is a wealth of information for the discrete case. Has anybody seen the continuous case stated somewhere?
reference-request mg.metric-geometry geometric-measure-theory isoperimetric-problems
reference-request mg.metric-geometry geometric-measure-theory isoperimetric-problems
asked 3 hours ago
Stefan SteinerbergerStefan Steinerberger
233
New contributor
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
Stefan SteinerbergerStefan Steinerberger
233
New contributor
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Stefan Steinerberger
asked 3 hours ago
Stefan SteinerbergerStefan Steinerberger
233
New contributor
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
Stefan SteinerbergerStefan Steinerberger
233
asked 3 hours ago
Stefan SteinerbergerStefan Steinerberger
233
233
New contributor
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This result is known as the relative isoperimetric inequality, see e.g. Functions of Bounded Variation by L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco and D. Pallara (2000), Eq. (3.43).
It follows from Poincare inequality (see e.g. Eq. (3.41) in the cited book) applied to $chi_Omega$ (the indicator of the set $Omega$). Indeed, by Poincare inequality it holds
$|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_{L^p((0,1)^d)} le C |Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)$, where $p=frac{d}{d-1}$. Here $|Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)=mathcal{H}^{d-1}(partial Omega cap (0,1^d))$ if $partial Omega$ is sufficiently smooth.
And
$$
|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_p = bigl((1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))^p mbox{vol}(Omega) + mbox{vol}(Omega)^p (1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))bigr)^{1/p} ge frac{1}{2} mbox{vol}(Omega)^{1/p}
$$
since $mbox{vol}(Omega) le frac{1}{2}$.
answered 17 mins ago
SkeeveSkeeve
953514
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328607%2fan-isoperimetric-type-inequality-inside-a-cube%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This result is known as the relative isoperimetric inequality, see e.g. Functions of Bounded Variation by L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco and D. Pallara (2000), Eq. (3.43).
It follows from Poincare inequality (see e.g. Eq. (3.41) in the cited book) applied to $chi_Omega$ (the indicator of the set $Omega$). Indeed, by Poincare inequality it holds
$|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_{L^p((0,1)^d)} le C |Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)$, where $p=frac{d}{d-1}$. Here $|Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)=mathcal{H}^{d-1}(partial Omega cap (0,1^d))$ if $partial Omega$ is sufficiently smooth.
And
$$
|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_p = bigl((1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))^p mbox{vol}(Omega) + mbox{vol}(Omega)^p (1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))bigr)^{1/p} ge frac{1}{2} mbox{vol}(Omega)^{1/p}
$$
since $mbox{vol}(Omega) le frac{1}{2}$.
answered 17 mins ago
SkeeveSkeeve
953514
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This result is known as the relative isoperimetric inequality, see e.g. Functions of Bounded Variation by L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco and D. Pallara (2000), Eq. (3.43).
It follows from Poincare inequality (see e.g. Eq. (3.41) in the cited book) applied to $chi_Omega$ (the indicator of the set $Omega$). Indeed, by Poincare inequality it holds
$|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_{L^p((0,1)^d)} le C |Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)$, where $p=frac{d}{d-1}$. Here $|Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)=mathcal{H}^{d-1}(partial Omega cap (0,1^d))$ if $partial Omega$ is sufficiently smooth.
And
$$
|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_p = bigl((1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))^p mbox{vol}(Omega) + mbox{vol}(Omega)^p (1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))bigr)^{1/p} ge frac{1}{2} mbox{vol}(Omega)^{1/p}
$$
since $mbox{vol}(Omega) le frac{1}{2}$.
answered 17 mins ago
SkeeveSkeeve
953514
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This result is known as the relative isoperimetric inequality, see e.g. Functions of Bounded Variation by L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco and D. Pallara (2000), Eq. (3.43).
It follows from Poincare inequality (see e.g. Eq. (3.41) in the cited book) applied to $chi_Omega$ (the indicator of the set $Omega$). Indeed, by Poincare inequality it holds
$|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_{L^p((0,1)^d)} le C |Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)$, where $p=frac{d}{d-1}$. Here $|Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)=mathcal{H}^{d-1}(partial Omega cap (0,1^d))$ if $partial Omega$ is sufficiently smooth.
And
$$
|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_p = bigl((1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))^p mbox{vol}(Omega) + mbox{vol}(Omega)^p (1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))bigr)^{1/p} ge frac{1}{2} mbox{vol}(Omega)^{1/p}
$$
since $mbox{vol}(Omega) le frac{1}{2}$.
answered 17 mins ago
SkeeveSkeeve
953514
$endgroup$
This result is known as the relative isoperimetric inequality, see e.g. Functions of Bounded Variation by L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco and D. Pallara (2000), Eq. (3.43).
It follows from Poincare inequality (see e.g. Eq. (3.41) in the cited book) applied to $chi_Omega$ (the indicator of the set $Omega$). Indeed, by Poincare inequality it holds
$|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_{L^p((0,1)^d)} le C |Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)$, where $p=frac{d}{d-1}$. Here $|Dchi_Omega|((0,1)^d)=mathcal{H}^{d-1}(partial Omega cap (0,1^d))$ if $partial Omega$ is sufficiently smooth.
And
$$
|chi_Omega - mbox{vol}(Omega)|_p = bigl((1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))^p mbox{vol}(Omega) + mbox{vol}(Omega)^p (1 - mbox{vol}(Omega))bigr)^{1/p} ge frac{1}{2} mbox{vol}(Omega)^{1/p}
$$
since $mbox{vol}(Omega) le frac{1}{2}$.
answered 17 mins ago
SkeeveSkeeve
953514
answered 17 mins ago
SkeeveSkeeve
953514
answered 17 mins ago
SkeeveSkeeve
953514
answered 17 mins ago
SkeeveSkeeve
953514
953514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stefan Steinerberger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328607%2fan-isoperimetric-type-inequality-inside-a-cube%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
