strTok function (thread safe, supports empty tokens, doesn't change string)String case reverse function in...
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?
Do infinite dimensional systems make sense?
Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?
Alternative to sending password over mail?
Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?
Codimension of non-flat locus
Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?
Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?
Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?
Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?
Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each
Arrow those variables!
Cross compiling for RPi - error while loading shared libraries
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
LWC SFDX source push error TypeError: LWC1009: decl.moveTo is not a function
Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?
Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?
Rock identification in KY
What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?
strTok function (thread safe, supports empty tokens, doesn't change string)
String case reverse function in CGet line from string functionTDD: String Calculator KataC - K&R getint() variationSimple function to generate an HTML-safe stringGeneric Pairing Heap PerformancePattern for writing a generic string transformation functionChange a string into a function/def activatorC++ string tokenizing without streams, with certain conditionsRead consecutive blanks in array
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I'm new to C language and want to explode a string like we do in PHP explode()
function, I searched for a built-in function with the C standard library, and I found strtok
, but It doesn't support empty tokens like 1,2,3,,5
. Inspired by the answers I found in this SO question I made this function, it is supposed to be thread safe and support empty tokens and doesn't change the original string
char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)
{
char* string = *newString;
char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
int tokLenght = 0;
char* tok = (char*) 0;
if(!string) return (char*) 0;
delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
if(delimiterFound){
tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
}else{
tokLenght = strlen(string);
}
tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
tok[tokLenght] = '';
*newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;
return tok;
}
I designed it to be used like
char* input = "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,,,10,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) ){
printf("%sn", tok);
}
beginner c strings
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm new to C language and want to explode a string like we do in PHP explode()
function, I searched for a built-in function with the C standard library, and I found strtok
, but It doesn't support empty tokens like 1,2,3,,5
. Inspired by the answers I found in this SO question I made this function, it is supposed to be thread safe and support empty tokens and doesn't change the original string
char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)
{
char* string = *newString;
char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
int tokLenght = 0;
char* tok = (char*) 0;
if(!string) return (char*) 0;
delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
if(delimiterFound){
tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
}else{
tokLenght = strlen(string);
}
tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
tok[tokLenght] = '';
*newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;
return tok;
}
I designed it to be used like
char* input = "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,,,10,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) ){
printf("%sn", tok);
}
beginner c strings
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Better user-interface then the originalstrtok
. You may be interested instrsep
, too. code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/string/strsep.c.html
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@NeilEdelman thanks I never saw this function before, I will check it.
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's not in the standardC
libraries, but inPOSIX
, (any type ofgcc
.) However, likestrtok
, it obliterates thechar
to replace it with, so it's not the same.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm new to C language and want to explode a string like we do in PHP explode()
function, I searched for a built-in function with the C standard library, and I found strtok
, but It doesn't support empty tokens like 1,2,3,,5
. Inspired by the answers I found in this SO question I made this function, it is supposed to be thread safe and support empty tokens and doesn't change the original string
char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)
{
char* string = *newString;
char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
int tokLenght = 0;
char* tok = (char*) 0;
if(!string) return (char*) 0;
delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
if(delimiterFound){
tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
}else{
tokLenght = strlen(string);
}
tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
tok[tokLenght] = '';
*newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;
return tok;
}
I designed it to be used like
char* input = "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,,,10,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) ){
printf("%sn", tok);
}
beginner c strings
$endgroup$
I'm new to C language and want to explode a string like we do in PHP explode()
function, I searched for a built-in function with the C standard library, and I found strtok
, but It doesn't support empty tokens like 1,2,3,,5
. Inspired by the answers I found in this SO question I made this function, it is supposed to be thread safe and support empty tokens and doesn't change the original string
char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)
{
char* string = *newString;
char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
int tokLenght = 0;
char* tok = (char*) 0;
if(!string) return (char*) 0;
delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
if(delimiterFound){
tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
}else{
tokLenght = strlen(string);
}
tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
tok[tokLenght] = '';
*newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;
return tok;
}
I designed it to be used like
char* input = "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,,,10,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) ){
printf("%sn", tok);
}
beginner c strings
beginner c strings
asked 4 hours ago
Accountant مAccountant م
1727
1727
1
$begingroup$
Better user-interface then the originalstrtok
. You may be interested instrsep
, too. code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/string/strsep.c.html
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@NeilEdelman thanks I never saw this function before, I will check it.
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's not in the standardC
libraries, but inPOSIX
, (any type ofgcc
.) However, likestrtok
, it obliterates thechar
to replace it with, so it's not the same.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Better user-interface then the originalstrtok
. You may be interested instrsep
, too. code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/string/strsep.c.html
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@NeilEdelman thanks I never saw this function before, I will check it.
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's not in the standardC
libraries, but inPOSIX
, (any type ofgcc
.) However, likestrtok
, it obliterates thechar
to replace it with, so it's not the same.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Better user-interface then the original
strtok
. You may be interested in strsep
, too. code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/string/strsep.c.html$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Better user-interface then the original
strtok
. You may be interested in strsep
, too. code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/string/strsep.c.html$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@NeilEdelman thanks I never saw this function before, I will check it.
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@NeilEdelman thanks I never saw this function before, I will check it.
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It's not in the standard
C
libraries, but in POSIX
, (any type of gcc
.) However, like strtok
, it obliterates the char
to replace it with
, so it's not the same.$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It's not in the standard
C
libraries, but in POSIX
, (any type of gcc
.) However, like strtok
, it obliterates the char
to replace it with
, so it's not the same.$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character,*newString
will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong,delimiterFound + 1
is what you are actually after.
Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider
char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
....
char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
etc.
Always test that
malloc
didn't fail.
More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:
if (....) {
....
} else {
....
}
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug becausedelimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ?"fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say",;."
, in where any character delimits the string on its own right.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and readman strstr
more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentionedstrtok
, I expected thestrtok
semantics.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's my fault because I said it'sstrtok
, I wantedstrtok
that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL
instead of (char*) 0
as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght
misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength
.
You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember tofree()
memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get thetokLength
spelling note, aren't they the same ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a matter of style, and including.h
if you want to useNULL
. However, you don't have to cast(char *)0
, just use0
(orNULL
.) It knows from the return type.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216956%2fstrtok-function-thread-safe-supports-empty-tokens-doesnt-change-string%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character,*newString
will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong,delimiterFound + 1
is what you are actually after.
Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider
char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
....
char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
etc.
Always test that
malloc
didn't fail.
More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:
if (....) {
....
} else {
....
}
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug becausedelimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ?"fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say",;."
, in where any character delimits the string on its own right.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and readman strstr
more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentionedstrtok
, I expected thestrtok
semantics.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's my fault because I said it'sstrtok
, I wantedstrtok
that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character,*newString
will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong,delimiterFound + 1
is what you are actually after.
Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider
char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
....
char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
etc.
Always test that
malloc
didn't fail.
More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:
if (....) {
....
} else {
....
}
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug becausedelimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ?"fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say",;."
, in where any character delimits the string on its own right.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and readman strstr
more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentionedstrtok
, I expected thestrtok
semantics.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's my fault because I said it'sstrtok
, I wantedstrtok
that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character,*newString
will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong,delimiterFound + 1
is what you are actually after.
Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider
char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
....
char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
etc.
Always test that
malloc
didn't fail.
More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:
if (....) {
....
} else {
....
}
$endgroup$
delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character,*newString
will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong,delimiterFound + 1
is what you are actually after.
Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider
char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
....
char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
etc.
Always test that
malloc
didn't fail.
More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:
if (....) {
....
} else {
....
}
answered 2 hours ago
vnpvnp
40.6k233103
40.6k233103
1
$begingroup$
Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug becausedelimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ?"fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say",;."
, in where any character delimits the string on its own right.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and readman strstr
more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentionedstrtok
, I expected thestrtok
semantics.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's my fault because I said it'sstrtok
, I wantedstrtok
that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug becausedelimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ?"fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say",;."
, in where any character delimits the string on its own right.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and readman strstr
more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentionedstrtok
, I expected thestrtok
semantics.
$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's my fault because I said it'sstrtok
, I wantedstrtok
that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug because
delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ? "fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug because
delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter)
can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ? "fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say
",;."
, in where any character delimits the string on its own right.$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say
",;."
, in where any character delimits the string on its own right.$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and read
man strstr
more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentioned strtok
, I expected the strtok
semantics.$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and read
man strstr
more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentioned strtok
, I expected the strtok
semantics.$endgroup$
– vnp
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's my fault because I said it's
strtok
, I wanted strtok
that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's my fault because I said it's
strtok
, I wanted strtok
that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL
instead of (char*) 0
as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght
misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength
.
You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember tofree()
memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get thetokLength
spelling note, aren't they the same ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a matter of style, and including.h
if you want to useNULL
. However, you don't have to cast(char *)0
, just use0
(orNULL
.) It knows from the return type.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL
instead of (char*) 0
as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght
misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength
.
You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember tofree()
memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get thetokLength
spelling note, aren't they the same ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a matter of style, and including.h
if you want to useNULL
. However, you don't have to cast(char *)0
, just use0
(orNULL
.) It knows from the return type.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL
instead of (char*) 0
as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght
misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength
.
You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.
$endgroup$
From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL
instead of (char*) 0
as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght
misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength
.
You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.
answered 3 hours ago
1201ProgramAlarm1201ProgramAlarm
3,6532925
3,6532925
$begingroup$
Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember tofree()
memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get thetokLength
spelling note, aren't they the same ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a matter of style, and including.h
if you want to useNULL
. However, you don't have to cast(char *)0
, just use0
(orNULL
.) It knows from the return type.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember tofree()
memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get thetokLength
spelling note, aren't they the same ?
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a matter of style, and including.h
if you want to useNULL
. However, you don't have to cast(char *)0
, just use0
(orNULL
.) It knows from the return type.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember to
free()
memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get the tokLength
spelling note, aren't they the same ?$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember to
free()
memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get the tokLength
spelling note, aren't they the same ?$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It's a matter of style, and including
.h
if you want to use NULL
. However, you don't have to cast (char *)0
, just use 0
(or NULL
.) It knows from the return type.$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's a matter of style, and including
.h
if you want to use NULL
. However, you don't have to cast (char *)0
, just use 0
(or NULL
.) It knows from the return type.$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216956%2fstrtok-function-thread-safe-supports-empty-tokens-doesnt-change-string%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Better user-interface then the original
strtok
. You may be interested instrsep
, too. code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/string/strsep.c.html$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@NeilEdelman thanks I never saw this function before, I will check it.
$endgroup$
– Accountant م
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It's not in the standard
C
libraries, but inPOSIX
, (any type ofgcc
.) However, likestrtok
, it obliterates thechar
to replace it with, so it's not the same.
$endgroup$
– Neil Edelman
1 hour ago