Ttyjukl

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Does object always see its latest internal state irrespective of thread?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Alternative to sending password over mail?

Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file

Why can't I see bouncing of switch on oscilloscope screen?

When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?

How to move a thin line with the black arrow in Illustrator?

Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

NMaximize is not converging to a solution

Does Control's existence contradict the set canon with regards to AI?

How does the 2009 Star Trek film mesh with Enterprise canon?How does the Federation determine how to set their clocks?Are the Star Trek Discovery uniforms seen anywhere else in TOS canon?What's with the apparent cyborgs on the Shenzhou bridge?Is Star Trek: Discovery set in the original or the Kelvin timeline?Why does the Admiral tell L'Rell that the Federation has no death penalty?What is the meaning of the “You're not what I expected” scene with L’Rell and Cornwell?Why does Admiral Dougherty contradict his own argument with Captain Picard?Did Kirk's captaincy of the Enterprise have a canon starting date in TOS?Is Klingon version of Google consistent with Star Trek canon?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

1

Control has so far shown A LOT of abilities and a huge adaptiblity to situations and the ability to outsmart even very intelligent organic beings and set traps for them.

What I'm wondering is if its existence contradicts the set canon.

In TOS we had a super computer once who was given control over the Enterprise during wargames....that computer (an AI in essence) was said to be the best state of the art available in the Federation. Still, though it seems very lacking compared to Control.

Then 100 years later...Data with his positronic brain. He seems to be on equal footing with Control...MAYBE a bit more capable even. Still though it was said that his very existence and that he can be so humanlike is something extremely extraordinary and unheard of for artificial intelligences.

(Control on the other hand manages to impersonate humans quite easily and even better than Data was in that area as he alway seemed very stiff there).

So as it stands Control seems to be way too superior to what should be state of the art in that era and even 100 years later. Thus my quesiton is: Does Control's very existence contradict canon (with how control currently is....sans any time travels to eliminate its exitence from the start)?

star-trek star-trek-discovery

share|improve this question

edited 1 min ago

Rebel-Scum

4,55042449

asked 2 hours ago

ThomasThomas

7,52652753

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Not quite an answer, but the reason Data was stiff and not human was because he was designed that way. His earlier-built "brother" Lore was much more realistic - dangerously so.
  
  – Cadence
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Cadence I know still though data was adaptable but not so much. he could not escape that part of his coding....control managed to override every bit of its codingso far (especially the protect us part)
  
  – Thomas
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  no more than the entire series is an entire contradiction to most ST canon :
  
  – NKCampbell
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  It seems Discovery is overwriting most of the canon in many aspects... Spore drive!? AI?! Spock has a sister!? Khaaan
  
  – Rebel-Scum
  10 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

Control has so far shown A LOT of abilities and a huge adaptiblity to situations and the ability to outsmart even very intelligent organic beings and set traps for them.

What I'm wondering is if its existence contradicts the set canon.

In TOS we had a super computer once who was given control over the Enterprise during wargames....that computer (an AI in essence) was said to be the best state of the art available in the Federation. Still, though it seems very lacking compared to Control.

Then 100 years later...Data with his positronic brain. He seems to be on equal footing with Control...MAYBE a bit more capable even. Still though it was said that his very existence and that he can be so humanlike is something extremely extraordinary and unheard of for artificial intelligences.

(Control on the other hand manages to impersonate humans quite easily and even better than Data was in that area as he alway seemed very stiff there).

So as it stands Control seems to be way too superior to what should be state of the art in that era and even 100 years later. Thus my quesiton is: Does Control's very existence contradict canon (with how control currently is....sans any time travels to eliminate its exitence from the start)?

star-trek star-trek-discovery

share|improve this question

edited 1 min ago

Rebel-Scum

4,55042449

asked 2 hours ago

ThomasThomas

7,52652753

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Not quite an answer, but the reason Data was stiff and not human was because he was designed that way. His earlier-built "brother" Lore was much more realistic - dangerously so.
  
  – Cadence
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Cadence I know still though data was adaptable but not so much. he could not escape that part of his coding....control managed to override every bit of its codingso far (especially the protect us part)
  
  – Thomas
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  no more than the entire series is an entire contradiction to most ST canon :
  
  – NKCampbell
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  It seems Discovery is overwriting most of the canon in many aspects... Spore drive!? AI?! Spock has a sister!? Khaaan
  
  – Rebel-Scum
  10 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Control has so far shown A LOT of abilities and a huge adaptiblity to situations and the ability to outsmart even very intelligent organic beings and set traps for them.

What I'm wondering is if its existence contradicts the set canon.

In TOS we had a super computer once who was given control over the Enterprise during wargames....that computer (an AI in essence) was said to be the best state of the art available in the Federation. Still, though it seems very lacking compared to Control.

Then 100 years later...Data with his positronic brain. He seems to be on equal footing with Control...MAYBE a bit more capable even. Still though it was said that his very existence and that he can be so humanlike is something extremely extraordinary and unheard of for artificial intelligences.

(Control on the other hand manages to impersonate humans quite easily and even better than Data was in that area as he alway seemed very stiff there).

So as it stands Control seems to be way too superior to what should be state of the art in that era and even 100 years later. Thus my quesiton is: Does Control's very existence contradict canon (with how control currently is....sans any time travels to eliminate its exitence from the start)?

star-trek star-trek-discovery

share|improve this question

edited 1 min ago

Rebel-Scum

4,55042449

asked 2 hours ago

ThomasThomas

7,52652753

share|improve this question

edited 1 min ago

Rebel-Scum

4,55042449

asked 2 hours ago

ThomasThomas

7,52652753

share|improve this question

edited 1 min ago

Rebel-Scum

4,55042449

asked 2 hours ago

ThomasThomas

7,52652753

edited 1 min ago

Rebel-Scum

4,55042449

edited 1 min ago

Rebel-Scum

4,55042449

asked 2 hours ago

ThomasThomas

7,52652753

asked 2 hours ago

ThomasThomas

7,52652753