Why No Traditional Villains in Adventures of Superman? Announcing the arrival of Valued...

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

How would the world control an invulnerable immortal mass murderer?

Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters

What are the pros and cons of Aerospike nosecones?

Simplicity of the roots of a minimal polynomial

ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order

51k Euros annually for a family of 4 in Berlin: Is it enough?

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Echoing a tail command produces unexpected output?

Can I cast Passwall to drop an enemy into a 20-foot pit?

Is there a (better) way to access $wpdb results?

How can I (re)show post-installation notes?

What is Arya's weapon design?

How to bypass password on Windows XP account?

Is pollution the main cause of Notre Dame Cathedral's deterioration?

Why is my conclusion inconsistent with the van't Hoff equation?

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

Check which numbers satisfy the condition [A*B*C = A! + B! + C!]

What exactly is a "Meth" in Altered Carbon?

What does the word "veer" mean here?

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages



Why No Traditional Villains in Adventures of Superman?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Latest Blog Post: Highlights from 2019 – 1st Quarter
Favorite questions and answers from first quarter of 2019What did Adventures of Superman use from the comics and what was later added from the series?Why did DC Comics change The Daily Star to The Daily Planet?What Superbaby adventures are there?What did Adventures of Superman use from the comics and what was later added from the series?Why does Superman love Lois Lane?Why does Superman fly headfirst?Who are these classic DC characters?Superman: why so many “LL” initials?How long has Batman been “The World's Greatest Detective”?Are there any other villains (aside from Doomsday) who've killed Superman?Did Superman ever regain his memories of his Legion adventures with Supergirl?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







8















At the end of each episode of the TV show The Adventures of Superman, credit is given to the comics with the line, "Superman is based on the original character appearing in Superman magazine." By 1952, when the show premiered, villains such as Lex Luthor, Mr. Mxyzptlk, the Prankster, and Ultra-Humanite had already appeared in the comics (along with many who were not well known).



Why did the series avoid using any of these villains and avoid any of the more colorful villains and stick with everyday threats, such as gangsters?










share|improve this question


















  • 4





    Can you imagine how expensive special-effects to render Mr. Mxyzptlyk would have been?

    – Ernest Friedman-Hill
    Feb 5 '15 at 19:13













  • Yeah, @ErnestFriedman-Hill, but I can also imagine how many ways they would have found to do it cheaply or to dumb it down so they could do it.

    – Tango
    Feb 5 '15 at 19:19











  • Because the show wasn't being introduced to comic reading audiences, it was being written for NON-COMIC reading audiences who might not have related as well to the fantastic characters and colorful villains. (Not to mention the first episodes were in black and white.) Likely the ready availability of props from other genres helped dictate what stories were being told in this live-action version of the character.

    – Thaddeus Howze
    Feb 5 '15 at 22:59











  • @Thaddeus: That's a good point. If you have something that backs that up, wouldn't it be a good answer? (Warning: Someone else has told me they're researching it to give a good answer, too.)

    – Tango
    Feb 6 '15 at 0:38






  • 5





    I was alive then and watched the series. I remember people being of mixed opinions about Superman because he seemed like a good guy but it was hard to trust a man who couldn't be stopped by anything...The comic fans were tickled to see their hero in the flesh, so the fact there were few if any fantastic villains didn't bother them at all. We thrilled to watch Superman burst through walls and bounce bullets. We ignored the fact he would duck to dodge the thrown guns once they ran out of bullets...

    – Thaddeus Howze
    Feb 6 '15 at 0:58


















8















At the end of each episode of the TV show The Adventures of Superman, credit is given to the comics with the line, "Superman is based on the original character appearing in Superman magazine." By 1952, when the show premiered, villains such as Lex Luthor, Mr. Mxyzptlk, the Prankster, and Ultra-Humanite had already appeared in the comics (along with many who were not well known).



Why did the series avoid using any of these villains and avoid any of the more colorful villains and stick with everyday threats, such as gangsters?










share|improve this question


















  • 4





    Can you imagine how expensive special-effects to render Mr. Mxyzptlyk would have been?

    – Ernest Friedman-Hill
    Feb 5 '15 at 19:13













  • Yeah, @ErnestFriedman-Hill, but I can also imagine how many ways they would have found to do it cheaply or to dumb it down so they could do it.

    – Tango
    Feb 5 '15 at 19:19











  • Because the show wasn't being introduced to comic reading audiences, it was being written for NON-COMIC reading audiences who might not have related as well to the fantastic characters and colorful villains. (Not to mention the first episodes were in black and white.) Likely the ready availability of props from other genres helped dictate what stories were being told in this live-action version of the character.

    – Thaddeus Howze
    Feb 5 '15 at 22:59











  • @Thaddeus: That's a good point. If you have something that backs that up, wouldn't it be a good answer? (Warning: Someone else has told me they're researching it to give a good answer, too.)

    – Tango
    Feb 6 '15 at 0:38






  • 5





    I was alive then and watched the series. I remember people being of mixed opinions about Superman because he seemed like a good guy but it was hard to trust a man who couldn't be stopped by anything...The comic fans were tickled to see their hero in the flesh, so the fact there were few if any fantastic villains didn't bother them at all. We thrilled to watch Superman burst through walls and bounce bullets. We ignored the fact he would duck to dodge the thrown guns once they ran out of bullets...

    – Thaddeus Howze
    Feb 6 '15 at 0:58














8












8








8


1






At the end of each episode of the TV show The Adventures of Superman, credit is given to the comics with the line, "Superman is based on the original character appearing in Superman magazine." By 1952, when the show premiered, villains such as Lex Luthor, Mr. Mxyzptlk, the Prankster, and Ultra-Humanite had already appeared in the comics (along with many who were not well known).



Why did the series avoid using any of these villains and avoid any of the more colorful villains and stick with everyday threats, such as gangsters?










share|improve this question














At the end of each episode of the TV show The Adventures of Superman, credit is given to the comics with the line, "Superman is based on the original character appearing in Superman magazine." By 1952, when the show premiered, villains such as Lex Luthor, Mr. Mxyzptlk, the Prankster, and Ultra-Humanite had already appeared in the comics (along with many who were not well known).



Why did the series avoid using any of these villains and avoid any of the more colorful villains and stick with everyday threats, such as gangsters?







dc superman






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 5 '15 at 18:40









TangoTango

71.3k66402697




71.3k66402697








  • 4





    Can you imagine how expensive special-effects to render Mr. Mxyzptlyk would have been?

    – Ernest Friedman-Hill
    Feb 5 '15 at 19:13













  • Yeah, @ErnestFriedman-Hill, but I can also imagine how many ways they would have found to do it cheaply or to dumb it down so they could do it.

    – Tango
    Feb 5 '15 at 19:19











  • Because the show wasn't being introduced to comic reading audiences, it was being written for NON-COMIC reading audiences who might not have related as well to the fantastic characters and colorful villains. (Not to mention the first episodes were in black and white.) Likely the ready availability of props from other genres helped dictate what stories were being told in this live-action version of the character.

    – Thaddeus Howze
    Feb 5 '15 at 22:59











  • @Thaddeus: That's a good point. If you have something that backs that up, wouldn't it be a good answer? (Warning: Someone else has told me they're researching it to give a good answer, too.)

    – Tango
    Feb 6 '15 at 0:38






  • 5





    I was alive then and watched the series. I remember people being of mixed opinions about Superman because he seemed like a good guy but it was hard to trust a man who couldn't be stopped by anything...The comic fans were tickled to see their hero in the flesh, so the fact there were few if any fantastic villains didn't bother them at all. We thrilled to watch Superman burst through walls and bounce bullets. We ignored the fact he would duck to dodge the thrown guns once they ran out of bullets...

    – Thaddeus Howze
    Feb 6 '15 at 0:58














  • 4





    Can you imagine how expensive special-effects to render Mr. Mxyzptlyk would have been?

    – Ernest Friedman-Hill
    Feb 5 '15 at 19:13













  • Yeah, @ErnestFriedman-Hill, but I can also imagine how many ways they would have found to do it cheaply or to dumb it down so they could do it.

    – Tango
    Feb 5 '15 at 19:19











  • Because the show wasn't being introduced to comic reading audiences, it was being written for NON-COMIC reading audiences who might not have related as well to the fantastic characters and colorful villains. (Not to mention the first episodes were in black and white.) Likely the ready availability of props from other genres helped dictate what stories were being told in this live-action version of the character.

    – Thaddeus Howze
    Feb 5 '15 at 22:59











  • @Thaddeus: That's a good point. If you have something that backs that up, wouldn't it be a good answer? (Warning: Someone else has told me they're researching it to give a good answer, too.)

    – Tango
    Feb 6 '15 at 0:38






  • 5





    I was alive then and watched the series. I remember people being of mixed opinions about Superman because he seemed like a good guy but it was hard to trust a man who couldn't be stopped by anything...The comic fans were tickled to see their hero in the flesh, so the fact there were few if any fantastic villains didn't bother them at all. We thrilled to watch Superman burst through walls and bounce bullets. We ignored the fact he would duck to dodge the thrown guns once they ran out of bullets...

    – Thaddeus Howze
    Feb 6 '15 at 0:58








4




4





Can you imagine how expensive special-effects to render Mr. Mxyzptlyk would have been?

– Ernest Friedman-Hill
Feb 5 '15 at 19:13







Can you imagine how expensive special-effects to render Mr. Mxyzptlyk would have been?

– Ernest Friedman-Hill
Feb 5 '15 at 19:13















Yeah, @ErnestFriedman-Hill, but I can also imagine how many ways they would have found to do it cheaply or to dumb it down so they could do it.

– Tango
Feb 5 '15 at 19:19





Yeah, @ErnestFriedman-Hill, but I can also imagine how many ways they would have found to do it cheaply or to dumb it down so they could do it.

– Tango
Feb 5 '15 at 19:19













Because the show wasn't being introduced to comic reading audiences, it was being written for NON-COMIC reading audiences who might not have related as well to the fantastic characters and colorful villains. (Not to mention the first episodes were in black and white.) Likely the ready availability of props from other genres helped dictate what stories were being told in this live-action version of the character.

– Thaddeus Howze
Feb 5 '15 at 22:59





Because the show wasn't being introduced to comic reading audiences, it was being written for NON-COMIC reading audiences who might not have related as well to the fantastic characters and colorful villains. (Not to mention the first episodes were in black and white.) Likely the ready availability of props from other genres helped dictate what stories were being told in this live-action version of the character.

– Thaddeus Howze
Feb 5 '15 at 22:59













@Thaddeus: That's a good point. If you have something that backs that up, wouldn't it be a good answer? (Warning: Someone else has told me they're researching it to give a good answer, too.)

– Tango
Feb 6 '15 at 0:38





@Thaddeus: That's a good point. If you have something that backs that up, wouldn't it be a good answer? (Warning: Someone else has told me they're researching it to give a good answer, too.)

– Tango
Feb 6 '15 at 0:38




5




5





I was alive then and watched the series. I remember people being of mixed opinions about Superman because he seemed like a good guy but it was hard to trust a man who couldn't be stopped by anything...The comic fans were tickled to see their hero in the flesh, so the fact there were few if any fantastic villains didn't bother them at all. We thrilled to watch Superman burst through walls and bounce bullets. We ignored the fact he would duck to dodge the thrown guns once they ran out of bullets...

– Thaddeus Howze
Feb 6 '15 at 0:58





I was alive then and watched the series. I remember people being of mixed opinions about Superman because he seemed like a good guy but it was hard to trust a man who couldn't be stopped by anything...The comic fans were tickled to see their hero in the flesh, so the fact there were few if any fantastic villains didn't bother them at all. We thrilled to watch Superman burst through walls and bounce bullets. We ignored the fact he would duck to dodge the thrown guns once they ran out of bullets...

– Thaddeus Howze
Feb 6 '15 at 0:58










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














The short answer is, because comic books and TV shows targeted towards children (Superman being sponsored by Kellogg's, to market their Frost Flakes and later plain Corn Flakes) there was public outcry about the content within them.



Robert Maxwell had already developed season one primarily off his radio program before he went looking for sponsors. When Kellogg's reviewed season one they insisted that the violence be toned down to make the show more kid friendly.




The most objectionable moments from 1951 had been removed in the re-editing of the series, and were not likely to be repeated no matter who sat in the producer's chair. Watchdog groups would ensure that macabre plots and sadistic villains would no longer be welcome. - ch 12.




When Ellsworth took over there was already outcry for season one. Writers such as Jackson Gillis tried to introduce more epic villains, but Ellsworth's editing veto prevented it.




Meldini is described int he teleplay as "a myopic European scientist" with an accent. Ellsworth's first change was to turn him into something out of a comic book. Gillis' scientist was far more grim and evil. - ch 12.




In April of 1953 there were Congressional Committee hearings on juvenile delinquency, with comic books and television programs being show cased and negative influences.




"Superman (with the big S on his uniform -- we should, I suppose, be thankful that it is not an S.S.) needs an endless stream of ever new submen, criminals and 'foreign-looking' people not only to justify his existence but even to make it possible." - Wertham's conclusion on comic book influences. - ch 13.




In September of that same year 24 publishers came together to create the Comics Code Authority, which used a template of DC's Code of Ethics originally created by Ellsworth and Liebowitz in 1940. It included the clause In every instance good shall triumph over evil and the criminal punished for his misdeeds.




Ellsworth may have thought he'd effectively toned down the violence after Maxwell, but now he even had to reign in his own taste. Banished forever were stories that might remotely be construed as horror or overly suspenseful, such as "Panic in the Sky", "A Ghost for Scotland Yard" and 'Lady in Black." Banished was any form of murder, both on- and off-screen, and if a character received a blow to the head, the scrip specified that it should happen "OUT OF FRAME,' with never so much as a lump afterward. Banished were criminal masterminds like the Wrecker, replaced for the most part with bumbling two-bit hoodlums. If one with a medium of intelligence happened to slip by, he was always paired with an imbecile. - emphasis added. ch 13.




That last quote is perhaps the most telling. Super criminals such as Lex Luthor were not allowed on the show.




Superman was now to be a children's show first, a family show second, with no risk of controversy. - ch 13.




Scifi villains such as Brainiac were somewhat out of character for the show. Other than the title Kryptonian, other aliens and out-world stories were at a bare minimum.



It wasn't until 1957 that would change.




By the summer of '57, comic book fantasy had replaced Davy Crockett heroism in the eyes of American youth. Shrinking men and hulking giants , prehistoric creatues and teenaged werewolves forced the singing cowboy from the B-picture scene. The logical solution was to let fast-paced action take a back seat to situations laced with science fiction overtones. For the first time, the producer would dispense with Mort Weisinger's services and simply co-write non of the scripts himself; - ch 14




That didn't change the general tone of the show and the insistence that Good must triumph over Evil. The show had also always featured Clark Kent and the Daily Planet with Superman coming in the end to save the day. To introduce regular super villains would have requirement more of the story to focus on Superman.



| All quotes are taken from Flights of Fantasy: The Unauthorized but True Story of Radio & TV's Adventures of Superman



Superman Super Site has this to say:




Neither Lex Luthor, Brainiac nor any of the regular comic book villains were used in the TV scripts, although a midget Martian, "Mr. Zero" (Billy Curtis) bore a vague similarity (in relative size only) to the comics' magical imp and recurring Superman villain Mr. Mxyzptlk. Carrying over the precedents established in previous electronic media productions of Superman, the bad guys on the TV show were usually generic thugs, evil scientists, Russian agents, crooked businessmen, or spies of fictitious foreign countries.




The claim that it was a precedent of established electronic media to not include the likes of Lex Luthor is patently false. As the 1950 Atom Man vs Superman has Lex Luthor masquerading as Atom Man against Superman.






share|improve this answer


























  • Excellent answer!

    – Tango
    Feb 11 '15 at 23:27



















1














The answer is likely more simple than the violence aspect, and has been the same answer for almost every superhero TV show we've seen until recent history.



They cost money.



Until the Marvel shows, almost no live-action comic book based TV show has offered "super-villains" on par with what see in the comics. And the reason is simple - they're expensive. The expense of the hero already putting a strain on the budget - Hulk could transform no more than twice an episode, for example. So the cost of TWO effects-heavy characters would break the bank.



So Wonder Woman fought generic Nazis, Spider-Man fought industrial criminals, and a guy with mind-control gas, and even Lois and Clark's "Super" level enemies were few and far between.



The villains are less well known



Everybody knows who Superman is. Brainiac? Not so much. So save for the fan-service of using a character from the comics, the producers decided the average TV viewer would be just as entertained by Superman fighting gangsters than, say, The Trickster. Lois and Clark used Luthor as the main villain because by that point, he had become as well known to the public as Superman, thanks to the movies. It was only in later seasons did they start bringing in characters that only (mostly) the comics fans would know, like Mr, Mxyzptlk and Intergang.



Add to that the cost factor of the first point (plus they'd probably have to pay for the rights to use any such character if they didn't already come as part of the initial deal) and you can see why they'd decide it simply didn't pay.



This is even the case going backwards - we didn't see "super villains" in the Republic serial adventures either. The Joker never showed up in the Batman Serials, nor Sivana in Captain Marvel. They didn't even use any of the classic baddies in Dick Tracy.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81019%2fwhy-no-traditional-villains-in-adventures-of-superman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    The short answer is, because comic books and TV shows targeted towards children (Superman being sponsored by Kellogg's, to market their Frost Flakes and later plain Corn Flakes) there was public outcry about the content within them.



    Robert Maxwell had already developed season one primarily off his radio program before he went looking for sponsors. When Kellogg's reviewed season one they insisted that the violence be toned down to make the show more kid friendly.




    The most objectionable moments from 1951 had been removed in the re-editing of the series, and were not likely to be repeated no matter who sat in the producer's chair. Watchdog groups would ensure that macabre plots and sadistic villains would no longer be welcome. - ch 12.




    When Ellsworth took over there was already outcry for season one. Writers such as Jackson Gillis tried to introduce more epic villains, but Ellsworth's editing veto prevented it.




    Meldini is described int he teleplay as "a myopic European scientist" with an accent. Ellsworth's first change was to turn him into something out of a comic book. Gillis' scientist was far more grim and evil. - ch 12.




    In April of 1953 there were Congressional Committee hearings on juvenile delinquency, with comic books and television programs being show cased and negative influences.




    "Superman (with the big S on his uniform -- we should, I suppose, be thankful that it is not an S.S.) needs an endless stream of ever new submen, criminals and 'foreign-looking' people not only to justify his existence but even to make it possible." - Wertham's conclusion on comic book influences. - ch 13.




    In September of that same year 24 publishers came together to create the Comics Code Authority, which used a template of DC's Code of Ethics originally created by Ellsworth and Liebowitz in 1940. It included the clause In every instance good shall triumph over evil and the criminal punished for his misdeeds.




    Ellsworth may have thought he'd effectively toned down the violence after Maxwell, but now he even had to reign in his own taste. Banished forever were stories that might remotely be construed as horror or overly suspenseful, such as "Panic in the Sky", "A Ghost for Scotland Yard" and 'Lady in Black." Banished was any form of murder, both on- and off-screen, and if a character received a blow to the head, the scrip specified that it should happen "OUT OF FRAME,' with never so much as a lump afterward. Banished were criminal masterminds like the Wrecker, replaced for the most part with bumbling two-bit hoodlums. If one with a medium of intelligence happened to slip by, he was always paired with an imbecile. - emphasis added. ch 13.




    That last quote is perhaps the most telling. Super criminals such as Lex Luthor were not allowed on the show.




    Superman was now to be a children's show first, a family show second, with no risk of controversy. - ch 13.




    Scifi villains such as Brainiac were somewhat out of character for the show. Other than the title Kryptonian, other aliens and out-world stories were at a bare minimum.



    It wasn't until 1957 that would change.




    By the summer of '57, comic book fantasy had replaced Davy Crockett heroism in the eyes of American youth. Shrinking men and hulking giants , prehistoric creatues and teenaged werewolves forced the singing cowboy from the B-picture scene. The logical solution was to let fast-paced action take a back seat to situations laced with science fiction overtones. For the first time, the producer would dispense with Mort Weisinger's services and simply co-write non of the scripts himself; - ch 14




    That didn't change the general tone of the show and the insistence that Good must triumph over Evil. The show had also always featured Clark Kent and the Daily Planet with Superman coming in the end to save the day. To introduce regular super villains would have requirement more of the story to focus on Superman.



    | All quotes are taken from Flights of Fantasy: The Unauthorized but True Story of Radio & TV's Adventures of Superman



    Superman Super Site has this to say:




    Neither Lex Luthor, Brainiac nor any of the regular comic book villains were used in the TV scripts, although a midget Martian, "Mr. Zero" (Billy Curtis) bore a vague similarity (in relative size only) to the comics' magical imp and recurring Superman villain Mr. Mxyzptlk. Carrying over the precedents established in previous electronic media productions of Superman, the bad guys on the TV show were usually generic thugs, evil scientists, Russian agents, crooked businessmen, or spies of fictitious foreign countries.




    The claim that it was a precedent of established electronic media to not include the likes of Lex Luthor is patently false. As the 1950 Atom Man vs Superman has Lex Luthor masquerading as Atom Man against Superman.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Excellent answer!

      – Tango
      Feb 11 '15 at 23:27
















    6














    The short answer is, because comic books and TV shows targeted towards children (Superman being sponsored by Kellogg's, to market their Frost Flakes and later plain Corn Flakes) there was public outcry about the content within them.



    Robert Maxwell had already developed season one primarily off his radio program before he went looking for sponsors. When Kellogg's reviewed season one they insisted that the violence be toned down to make the show more kid friendly.




    The most objectionable moments from 1951 had been removed in the re-editing of the series, and were not likely to be repeated no matter who sat in the producer's chair. Watchdog groups would ensure that macabre plots and sadistic villains would no longer be welcome. - ch 12.




    When Ellsworth took over there was already outcry for season one. Writers such as Jackson Gillis tried to introduce more epic villains, but Ellsworth's editing veto prevented it.




    Meldini is described int he teleplay as "a myopic European scientist" with an accent. Ellsworth's first change was to turn him into something out of a comic book. Gillis' scientist was far more grim and evil. - ch 12.




    In April of 1953 there were Congressional Committee hearings on juvenile delinquency, with comic books and television programs being show cased and negative influences.




    "Superman (with the big S on his uniform -- we should, I suppose, be thankful that it is not an S.S.) needs an endless stream of ever new submen, criminals and 'foreign-looking' people not only to justify his existence but even to make it possible." - Wertham's conclusion on comic book influences. - ch 13.




    In September of that same year 24 publishers came together to create the Comics Code Authority, which used a template of DC's Code of Ethics originally created by Ellsworth and Liebowitz in 1940. It included the clause In every instance good shall triumph over evil and the criminal punished for his misdeeds.




    Ellsworth may have thought he'd effectively toned down the violence after Maxwell, but now he even had to reign in his own taste. Banished forever were stories that might remotely be construed as horror or overly suspenseful, such as "Panic in the Sky", "A Ghost for Scotland Yard" and 'Lady in Black." Banished was any form of murder, both on- and off-screen, and if a character received a blow to the head, the scrip specified that it should happen "OUT OF FRAME,' with never so much as a lump afterward. Banished were criminal masterminds like the Wrecker, replaced for the most part with bumbling two-bit hoodlums. If one with a medium of intelligence happened to slip by, he was always paired with an imbecile. - emphasis added. ch 13.




    That last quote is perhaps the most telling. Super criminals such as Lex Luthor were not allowed on the show.




    Superman was now to be a children's show first, a family show second, with no risk of controversy. - ch 13.




    Scifi villains such as Brainiac were somewhat out of character for the show. Other than the title Kryptonian, other aliens and out-world stories were at a bare minimum.



    It wasn't until 1957 that would change.




    By the summer of '57, comic book fantasy had replaced Davy Crockett heroism in the eyes of American youth. Shrinking men and hulking giants , prehistoric creatues and teenaged werewolves forced the singing cowboy from the B-picture scene. The logical solution was to let fast-paced action take a back seat to situations laced with science fiction overtones. For the first time, the producer would dispense with Mort Weisinger's services and simply co-write non of the scripts himself; - ch 14




    That didn't change the general tone of the show and the insistence that Good must triumph over Evil. The show had also always featured Clark Kent and the Daily Planet with Superman coming in the end to save the day. To introduce regular super villains would have requirement more of the story to focus on Superman.



    | All quotes are taken from Flights of Fantasy: The Unauthorized but True Story of Radio & TV's Adventures of Superman



    Superman Super Site has this to say:




    Neither Lex Luthor, Brainiac nor any of the regular comic book villains were used in the TV scripts, although a midget Martian, "Mr. Zero" (Billy Curtis) bore a vague similarity (in relative size only) to the comics' magical imp and recurring Superman villain Mr. Mxyzptlk. Carrying over the precedents established in previous electronic media productions of Superman, the bad guys on the TV show were usually generic thugs, evil scientists, Russian agents, crooked businessmen, or spies of fictitious foreign countries.




    The claim that it was a precedent of established electronic media to not include the likes of Lex Luthor is patently false. As the 1950 Atom Man vs Superman has Lex Luthor masquerading as Atom Man against Superman.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Excellent answer!

      – Tango
      Feb 11 '15 at 23:27














    6












    6








    6







    The short answer is, because comic books and TV shows targeted towards children (Superman being sponsored by Kellogg's, to market their Frost Flakes and later plain Corn Flakes) there was public outcry about the content within them.



    Robert Maxwell had already developed season one primarily off his radio program before he went looking for sponsors. When Kellogg's reviewed season one they insisted that the violence be toned down to make the show more kid friendly.




    The most objectionable moments from 1951 had been removed in the re-editing of the series, and were not likely to be repeated no matter who sat in the producer's chair. Watchdog groups would ensure that macabre plots and sadistic villains would no longer be welcome. - ch 12.




    When Ellsworth took over there was already outcry for season one. Writers such as Jackson Gillis tried to introduce more epic villains, but Ellsworth's editing veto prevented it.




    Meldini is described int he teleplay as "a myopic European scientist" with an accent. Ellsworth's first change was to turn him into something out of a comic book. Gillis' scientist was far more grim and evil. - ch 12.




    In April of 1953 there were Congressional Committee hearings on juvenile delinquency, with comic books and television programs being show cased and negative influences.




    "Superman (with the big S on his uniform -- we should, I suppose, be thankful that it is not an S.S.) needs an endless stream of ever new submen, criminals and 'foreign-looking' people not only to justify his existence but even to make it possible." - Wertham's conclusion on comic book influences. - ch 13.




    In September of that same year 24 publishers came together to create the Comics Code Authority, which used a template of DC's Code of Ethics originally created by Ellsworth and Liebowitz in 1940. It included the clause In every instance good shall triumph over evil and the criminal punished for his misdeeds.




    Ellsworth may have thought he'd effectively toned down the violence after Maxwell, but now he even had to reign in his own taste. Banished forever were stories that might remotely be construed as horror or overly suspenseful, such as "Panic in the Sky", "A Ghost for Scotland Yard" and 'Lady in Black." Banished was any form of murder, both on- and off-screen, and if a character received a blow to the head, the scrip specified that it should happen "OUT OF FRAME,' with never so much as a lump afterward. Banished were criminal masterminds like the Wrecker, replaced for the most part with bumbling two-bit hoodlums. If one with a medium of intelligence happened to slip by, he was always paired with an imbecile. - emphasis added. ch 13.




    That last quote is perhaps the most telling. Super criminals such as Lex Luthor were not allowed on the show.




    Superman was now to be a children's show first, a family show second, with no risk of controversy. - ch 13.




    Scifi villains such as Brainiac were somewhat out of character for the show. Other than the title Kryptonian, other aliens and out-world stories were at a bare minimum.



    It wasn't until 1957 that would change.




    By the summer of '57, comic book fantasy had replaced Davy Crockett heroism in the eyes of American youth. Shrinking men and hulking giants , prehistoric creatues and teenaged werewolves forced the singing cowboy from the B-picture scene. The logical solution was to let fast-paced action take a back seat to situations laced with science fiction overtones. For the first time, the producer would dispense with Mort Weisinger's services and simply co-write non of the scripts himself; - ch 14




    That didn't change the general tone of the show and the insistence that Good must triumph over Evil. The show had also always featured Clark Kent and the Daily Planet with Superman coming in the end to save the day. To introduce regular super villains would have requirement more of the story to focus on Superman.



    | All quotes are taken from Flights of Fantasy: The Unauthorized but True Story of Radio & TV's Adventures of Superman



    Superman Super Site has this to say:




    Neither Lex Luthor, Brainiac nor any of the regular comic book villains were used in the TV scripts, although a midget Martian, "Mr. Zero" (Billy Curtis) bore a vague similarity (in relative size only) to the comics' magical imp and recurring Superman villain Mr. Mxyzptlk. Carrying over the precedents established in previous electronic media productions of Superman, the bad guys on the TV show were usually generic thugs, evil scientists, Russian agents, crooked businessmen, or spies of fictitious foreign countries.




    The claim that it was a precedent of established electronic media to not include the likes of Lex Luthor is patently false. As the 1950 Atom Man vs Superman has Lex Luthor masquerading as Atom Man against Superman.






    share|improve this answer















    The short answer is, because comic books and TV shows targeted towards children (Superman being sponsored by Kellogg's, to market their Frost Flakes and later plain Corn Flakes) there was public outcry about the content within them.



    Robert Maxwell had already developed season one primarily off his radio program before he went looking for sponsors. When Kellogg's reviewed season one they insisted that the violence be toned down to make the show more kid friendly.




    The most objectionable moments from 1951 had been removed in the re-editing of the series, and were not likely to be repeated no matter who sat in the producer's chair. Watchdog groups would ensure that macabre plots and sadistic villains would no longer be welcome. - ch 12.




    When Ellsworth took over there was already outcry for season one. Writers such as Jackson Gillis tried to introduce more epic villains, but Ellsworth's editing veto prevented it.




    Meldini is described int he teleplay as "a myopic European scientist" with an accent. Ellsworth's first change was to turn him into something out of a comic book. Gillis' scientist was far more grim and evil. - ch 12.




    In April of 1953 there were Congressional Committee hearings on juvenile delinquency, with comic books and television programs being show cased and negative influences.




    "Superman (with the big S on his uniform -- we should, I suppose, be thankful that it is not an S.S.) needs an endless stream of ever new submen, criminals and 'foreign-looking' people not only to justify his existence but even to make it possible." - Wertham's conclusion on comic book influences. - ch 13.




    In September of that same year 24 publishers came together to create the Comics Code Authority, which used a template of DC's Code of Ethics originally created by Ellsworth and Liebowitz in 1940. It included the clause In every instance good shall triumph over evil and the criminal punished for his misdeeds.




    Ellsworth may have thought he'd effectively toned down the violence after Maxwell, but now he even had to reign in his own taste. Banished forever were stories that might remotely be construed as horror or overly suspenseful, such as "Panic in the Sky", "A Ghost for Scotland Yard" and 'Lady in Black." Banished was any form of murder, both on- and off-screen, and if a character received a blow to the head, the scrip specified that it should happen "OUT OF FRAME,' with never so much as a lump afterward. Banished were criminal masterminds like the Wrecker, replaced for the most part with bumbling two-bit hoodlums. If one with a medium of intelligence happened to slip by, he was always paired with an imbecile. - emphasis added. ch 13.




    That last quote is perhaps the most telling. Super criminals such as Lex Luthor were not allowed on the show.




    Superman was now to be a children's show first, a family show second, with no risk of controversy. - ch 13.




    Scifi villains such as Brainiac were somewhat out of character for the show. Other than the title Kryptonian, other aliens and out-world stories were at a bare minimum.



    It wasn't until 1957 that would change.




    By the summer of '57, comic book fantasy had replaced Davy Crockett heroism in the eyes of American youth. Shrinking men and hulking giants , prehistoric creatues and teenaged werewolves forced the singing cowboy from the B-picture scene. The logical solution was to let fast-paced action take a back seat to situations laced with science fiction overtones. For the first time, the producer would dispense with Mort Weisinger's services and simply co-write non of the scripts himself; - ch 14




    That didn't change the general tone of the show and the insistence that Good must triumph over Evil. The show had also always featured Clark Kent and the Daily Planet with Superman coming in the end to save the day. To introduce regular super villains would have requirement more of the story to focus on Superman.



    | All quotes are taken from Flights of Fantasy: The Unauthorized but True Story of Radio & TV's Adventures of Superman



    Superman Super Site has this to say:




    Neither Lex Luthor, Brainiac nor any of the regular comic book villains were used in the TV scripts, although a midget Martian, "Mr. Zero" (Billy Curtis) bore a vague similarity (in relative size only) to the comics' magical imp and recurring Superman villain Mr. Mxyzptlk. Carrying over the precedents established in previous electronic media productions of Superman, the bad guys on the TV show were usually generic thugs, evil scientists, Russian agents, crooked businessmen, or spies of fictitious foreign countries.




    The claim that it was a precedent of established electronic media to not include the likes of Lex Luthor is patently false. As the 1950 Atom Man vs Superman has Lex Luthor masquerading as Atom Man against Superman.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 7 mins ago

























    answered Feb 11 '15 at 19:21









    Jack B NimbleJack B Nimble

    83.3k44355637




    83.3k44355637













    • Excellent answer!

      – Tango
      Feb 11 '15 at 23:27



















    • Excellent answer!

      – Tango
      Feb 11 '15 at 23:27

















    Excellent answer!

    – Tango
    Feb 11 '15 at 23:27





    Excellent answer!

    – Tango
    Feb 11 '15 at 23:27













    1














    The answer is likely more simple than the violence aspect, and has been the same answer for almost every superhero TV show we've seen until recent history.



    They cost money.



    Until the Marvel shows, almost no live-action comic book based TV show has offered "super-villains" on par with what see in the comics. And the reason is simple - they're expensive. The expense of the hero already putting a strain on the budget - Hulk could transform no more than twice an episode, for example. So the cost of TWO effects-heavy characters would break the bank.



    So Wonder Woman fought generic Nazis, Spider-Man fought industrial criminals, and a guy with mind-control gas, and even Lois and Clark's "Super" level enemies were few and far between.



    The villains are less well known



    Everybody knows who Superman is. Brainiac? Not so much. So save for the fan-service of using a character from the comics, the producers decided the average TV viewer would be just as entertained by Superman fighting gangsters than, say, The Trickster. Lois and Clark used Luthor as the main villain because by that point, he had become as well known to the public as Superman, thanks to the movies. It was only in later seasons did they start bringing in characters that only (mostly) the comics fans would know, like Mr, Mxyzptlk and Intergang.



    Add to that the cost factor of the first point (plus they'd probably have to pay for the rights to use any such character if they didn't already come as part of the initial deal) and you can see why they'd decide it simply didn't pay.



    This is even the case going backwards - we didn't see "super villains" in the Republic serial adventures either. The Joker never showed up in the Batman Serials, nor Sivana in Captain Marvel. They didn't even use any of the classic baddies in Dick Tracy.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      The answer is likely more simple than the violence aspect, and has been the same answer for almost every superhero TV show we've seen until recent history.



      They cost money.



      Until the Marvel shows, almost no live-action comic book based TV show has offered "super-villains" on par with what see in the comics. And the reason is simple - they're expensive. The expense of the hero already putting a strain on the budget - Hulk could transform no more than twice an episode, for example. So the cost of TWO effects-heavy characters would break the bank.



      So Wonder Woman fought generic Nazis, Spider-Man fought industrial criminals, and a guy with mind-control gas, and even Lois and Clark's "Super" level enemies were few and far between.



      The villains are less well known



      Everybody knows who Superman is. Brainiac? Not so much. So save for the fan-service of using a character from the comics, the producers decided the average TV viewer would be just as entertained by Superman fighting gangsters than, say, The Trickster. Lois and Clark used Luthor as the main villain because by that point, he had become as well known to the public as Superman, thanks to the movies. It was only in later seasons did they start bringing in characters that only (mostly) the comics fans would know, like Mr, Mxyzptlk and Intergang.



      Add to that the cost factor of the first point (plus they'd probably have to pay for the rights to use any such character if they didn't already come as part of the initial deal) and you can see why they'd decide it simply didn't pay.



      This is even the case going backwards - we didn't see "super villains" in the Republic serial adventures either. The Joker never showed up in the Batman Serials, nor Sivana in Captain Marvel. They didn't even use any of the classic baddies in Dick Tracy.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        The answer is likely more simple than the violence aspect, and has been the same answer for almost every superhero TV show we've seen until recent history.



        They cost money.



        Until the Marvel shows, almost no live-action comic book based TV show has offered "super-villains" on par with what see in the comics. And the reason is simple - they're expensive. The expense of the hero already putting a strain on the budget - Hulk could transform no more than twice an episode, for example. So the cost of TWO effects-heavy characters would break the bank.



        So Wonder Woman fought generic Nazis, Spider-Man fought industrial criminals, and a guy with mind-control gas, and even Lois and Clark's "Super" level enemies were few and far between.



        The villains are less well known



        Everybody knows who Superman is. Brainiac? Not so much. So save for the fan-service of using a character from the comics, the producers decided the average TV viewer would be just as entertained by Superman fighting gangsters than, say, The Trickster. Lois and Clark used Luthor as the main villain because by that point, he had become as well known to the public as Superman, thanks to the movies. It was only in later seasons did they start bringing in characters that only (mostly) the comics fans would know, like Mr, Mxyzptlk and Intergang.



        Add to that the cost factor of the first point (plus they'd probably have to pay for the rights to use any such character if they didn't already come as part of the initial deal) and you can see why they'd decide it simply didn't pay.



        This is even the case going backwards - we didn't see "super villains" in the Republic serial adventures either. The Joker never showed up in the Batman Serials, nor Sivana in Captain Marvel. They didn't even use any of the classic baddies in Dick Tracy.






        share|improve this answer













        The answer is likely more simple than the violence aspect, and has been the same answer for almost every superhero TV show we've seen until recent history.



        They cost money.



        Until the Marvel shows, almost no live-action comic book based TV show has offered "super-villains" on par with what see in the comics. And the reason is simple - they're expensive. The expense of the hero already putting a strain on the budget - Hulk could transform no more than twice an episode, for example. So the cost of TWO effects-heavy characters would break the bank.



        So Wonder Woman fought generic Nazis, Spider-Man fought industrial criminals, and a guy with mind-control gas, and even Lois and Clark's "Super" level enemies were few and far between.



        The villains are less well known



        Everybody knows who Superman is. Brainiac? Not so much. So save for the fan-service of using a character from the comics, the producers decided the average TV viewer would be just as entertained by Superman fighting gangsters than, say, The Trickster. Lois and Clark used Luthor as the main villain because by that point, he had become as well known to the public as Superman, thanks to the movies. It was only in later seasons did they start bringing in characters that only (mostly) the comics fans would know, like Mr, Mxyzptlk and Intergang.



        Add to that the cost factor of the first point (plus they'd probably have to pay for the rights to use any such character if they didn't already come as part of the initial deal) and you can see why they'd decide it simply didn't pay.



        This is even the case going backwards - we didn't see "super villains" in the Republic serial adventures either. The Joker never showed up in the Batman Serials, nor Sivana in Captain Marvel. They didn't even use any of the classic baddies in Dick Tracy.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 7 '18 at 21:14









        VBartilucciVBartilucci

        9,29411842




        9,29411842






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81019%2fwhy-no-traditional-villains-in-adventures-of-superman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Gersau Kjelder | Navigasjonsmeny46°59′0″N 8°31′0″E46°59′0″N...

            Nässjö kommun Tettstader | Kjelder | NavigasjonsmenyeVIAFISNIGeoNamesMusicBrainz (area)

            Kvitkval Innhaldsliste Taksonomi og utvikling | Utsjånad og levevis | Utbreiing | Åtferd |...