Ttyjukl

Can I retract my name from an already published manuscript?

What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?

Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview

I am on the US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?

Is there a way to help users from having to clicking emails twice before logging into a new sandbox

Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?

Find the number of ways to express 1050 as sum of consecutive integers

4 Spheres all touching each other??

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

Auto Insert date into Notepad

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

Finding ratio of the area of triangles

What happens if a wizard reaches level 20 but has no 3rd-level spells that they can use with the Signature Spells feature?

How to push a box with physics engine by another object?

Why does the DC-9-80 have this cusp in its fuselage?

How to approximate rolls for potions of healing using only d6's?

Which branches of mathematics can be done just in terms of morphisms and composition?

Do commercial flights continue with an engine out?

Why is c4 a better move in this position?

Obtaining a matrix of complex values from associations giving the real and imaginary parts of each element?

Why didn't Eru and/or the Valar intervene when Sauron corrupted Númenor?

What is the meaning of "pick up" in this sentence?

Why is this code uniquely decodable?

Does Windows 10's telemetry include sending *.doc files if Word crashed?

How do Japanese speakers determine the implied topic when none has been mentioned?

How does the use of いかんによっては in this question determine one answer over another?How do you say “like when you” or “the way you” in Japanese?How would you say “A has the meaning of B” or “A conveys B”How do I determine the indirect object of a command?How do ことになる and ようになる differ? (When ことになる cannot = “It has been decided that”)How has japanese writing changed in the last century?How to determine the scope of subject?How to determine the scope of modifiers in long sentences?てくれる vs てもらう when the topic or subject is impliedHow do I figure out what the implied subject is?

2

I imagine this is something that Japanese speakers naturally build up as they are exposed and communicate in the language for many years. However, take the following scene:

「おお、豪華な魚料理だなぁ」

「港町だけあって魚がやっぱり自慢みたい」- From context this is clearly not referring to the speaker or listener.

「それと地酒も集まるからそっちも沢山」

「お酒か……普段はあんまり飲まないけど、それならたまには……」 - Speaker

「ああ、いただくとしよう」- Speaker

「それじゃ、かんぱーい」

(they all get drunk and have a hang over and get woken up the next
morning)

「朝ーーーーー！」

「ほらほら、みんな起きてー！」

「うう……頭痛い……」- SPeaker

「私も、です……」- Speaker

「少し昨日は、飲み過ぎたな……」- Ambiguous? The speaker (at the bare minimum) is saying that they drank too much yesterday, however they could also be saying "We" drank too much. How does one differentiate between these? Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?

「普段あまり飲まないからなぁ……加減が分からなくなってしまった」I guess that this is referring to the speaker as it is the same person as before who said they don't drink very much

grammar

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

sacredz1sacredz1

111

New contributor

sacredz1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

2

I imagine this is something that Japanese speakers naturally build up as they are exposed and communicate in the language for many years. However, take the following scene:

「おお、豪華な魚料理だなぁ」

「港町だけあって魚がやっぱり自慢みたい」- From context this is clearly not referring to the speaker or listener.

「それと地酒も集まるからそっちも沢山」

「お酒か……普段はあんまり飲まないけど、それならたまには……」 - Speaker

「ああ、いただくとしよう」- Speaker

「それじゃ、かんぱーい」

(they all get drunk and have a hang over and get woken up the next
morning)

「朝ーーーーー！」

「ほらほら、みんな起きてー！」

「うう……頭痛い……」- SPeaker

「私も、です……」- Speaker

「少し昨日は、飲み過ぎたな……」- Ambiguous? The speaker (at the bare minimum) is saying that they drank too much yesterday, however they could also be saying "We" drank too much. How does one differentiate between these? Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?

「普段あまり飲まないからなぁ……加減が分からなくなってしまった」I guess that this is referring to the speaker as it is the same person as before who said they don't drink very much

grammar

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

sacredz1sacredz1

111

New contributor

sacredz1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

I imagine this is something that Japanese speakers naturally build up as they are exposed and communicate in the language for many years. However, take the following scene:

「おお、豪華な魚料理だなぁ」

「港町だけあって魚がやっぱり自慢みたい」- From context this is clearly not referring to the speaker or listener.

「それと地酒も集まるからそっちも沢山」

「お酒か……普段はあんまり飲まないけど、それならたまには……」 - Speaker

「ああ、いただくとしよう」- Speaker

「それじゃ、かんぱーい」

(they all get drunk and have a hang over and get woken up the next
morning)

「朝ーーーーー！」

「ほらほら、みんな起きてー！」

「うう……頭痛い……」- SPeaker

「私も、です……」- Speaker

「少し昨日は、飲み過ぎたな……」- Ambiguous? The speaker (at the bare minimum) is saying that they drank too much yesterday, however they could also be saying "We" drank too much. How does one differentiate between these? Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?

「普段あまり飲まないからなぁ……加減が分からなくなってしまった」I guess that this is referring to the speaker as it is the same person as before who said they don't drink very much

grammar

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

sacredz1sacredz1

111

New contributor

sacredz1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

sacredz1sacredz1

111

New contributor

sacredz1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

sacredz1sacredz1

111

New contributor

sacredz1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 5 hours ago

sacredz1sacredz1

111

New contributor

sacredz1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 5 hours ago

sacredz1sacredz1

111

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

5

Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?

If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.

In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.

Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".

It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 3 hours ago

narutonaruto

159k8153298

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject. 飲み過ぎたな...
  
  – suish
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
  
  – wip
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves" - er, wait, why?
  
  – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
  7 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

sacredz1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65825%2fhow-do-japanese-speakers-determine-the-implied-topic-when-none-has-been-mentione%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

5

Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?

If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.

In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.

Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".

It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 3 hours ago

narutonaruto

159k8153298

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject. 飲み過ぎたな...
  
  – suish
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
  
  – wip
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves" - er, wait, why?
  
  – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
  7 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

5

Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?

If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.

In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.

Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".

It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 3 hours ago

narutonaruto

159k8153298

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject. 飲み過ぎたな...
  
  – suish
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
  
  – wip
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves" - er, wait, why?
  
  – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
  7 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?

If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.

In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.

Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".

It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 3 hours ago

narutonaruto

159k8153298

share|improve this answer

edited 3 hours ago

answered 3 hours ago

narutonaruto

159k8153298

answered 3 hours ago

narutonaruto

159k8153298

answered 3 hours ago

narutonaruto

159k8153298